ch 1 and 2 crossword

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
New
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/27

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

28 Terms

1
New cards

unable to petition by blocking a major highway or emergency room

time place manner restrictions

2
New cards

beyond a reasonable doubt

criminal burden

3
New cards

“the power of Congress to promote interstate commerce also includesthe power to regulate the local incidents thereof, including localactivities in both the states of origin and destination, which mighthave a substantial and harmful effect upon that commerce.”

heart of atlanta motel case

4
New cards

spoken false statements that damage a persons reputation

slander

5
New cards

must be substantial evidence that the majority of consumers weremisled.

false advertising

6
New cards

government can’t tell you how to practice your religion. If a law is“neutral” and “generally applicable,” then it (usually) doesn’t violate

free exercise clause

7
New cards

military combat, football players, boxers, ice hockey spectator

assumption of risk

8
New cards

held that the labels were protected as commercial speech under theFirst Amendment of the United States Constitution - restriction wenttoo far

bad frog brewery case

9
New cards

United States Congress shall have power "to regulate Commerce withforeign Nations, and among the several States, and with the IndianTribes".

commerce clause

10
New cards

written law of the land - must be adhered to - Nuremberg trial - " Iwas just following orders."

positive law

11
New cards

business can’t deliberately provide false or inaccurate information &claim freedom of speech as a defense

commercial speech

12
New cards

person who brings the action in a criminal proceeding

prosecutor

13
New cards

government can’t tell you what religion to practice, and that theycan’t favor one religion over another.

establishment clause

14
New cards

Whenever a plaintiffs cause of action is based, at least in part, on theUS Constitution, a treaty, or federal law - any controversy over $75kwhere parties have diversity of citizenship

federal jurisdiction

15
New cards

a principle or rule established in a previous legal case relevant to acourt

stare decisis

16
New cards

no real monetary loss

nominal damage

17
New cards

The statute must not result in an "excessive governmententanglement" with religious affairs. (also known as the EntanglementProng) The statute must not advance or inhibit religious practice (alsoknown as the Effect Prong) The statute must have a secularlegislative purpose. (also known as the Purpose Prong)

lemon test

18
New cards

ACCEPTABLE – exaggeration- EX:dogs saying, “Bacon”

puffery

19
New cards

failure of an injured plaintiff to act prudently, considered to be afactor in the injury suffered, and sometimes reducing the amountrecovered from the defendant.

contributory negligence

20
New cards

By a preponderance of the evidence

civil burden

21
New cards

a state must justify restrictions on truthful, non-misleadingcommercial speech by demonstrating that its restrictions "directlyadvance" a substantial state interest and are no more extensivethan necessary to serve that interest.

central hudson test

22
New cards

states cannot pass laws that prevent or discriminate againstinterstate commerce

dorment commerce clause

23
New cards

HADLEY V BAXENDALE

time is of the essence

24
New cards

The national government had the exclusive power to regulateinterstate commerce. Ruling expanded power of government tocontrol interstate commerce.

gibbons v ogden

25
New cards

Martin Luther king fighting for civil rights- provide criteria forjudging actions. It might be that the criterion is simple, such asright actions maximize the good

natural law

26
New cards

Was the speech directed at another and likely to provoke a violentresponse?

fighting words

27
New cards

The settling of a dispute by submitting it to a disinterested thirdparty (other than a court), who renders a decision

arbitration

28
New cards

Jim Crow, North Korea, Nazi Germany

law v justice