Courts right to hear an appeal and review the trial for error
2
New cards
Attorney General
Represents the U.S. in legal matters
3
New cards
Certiorari
writ or order saying that you will review the case
4
New cards
Federalist No 78
Hamilton affirmed that the independent judicial branch has the power of judicial review to examine acts of legislatures to see if they comport with the proposed Constitution
5
New cards
Judicial Review
to examine acts of legislatures to see if they comport with the proposed Constitution
6
New cards
Marbury v Madison
Judicial Review
\ Ruled that an appointed judge could assume for his appointed position
7
New cards
Original Jurisdiction
the authority to hear a case for the first time
8
New cards
U.S. District Courts
Lowest tier of the three level federal court system
9
New cards
U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals
Middle tier of the three level federal court system
10
New cards
U.S. Supreme Court
Top level of the three level federal court system
11
New cards
Binding Precedent
When a U.S. District court reviews a case that parallels an already decided case from the circuit level, the district court is obliged to rule the same way
12
New cards
Persuasive Precedent
Judges can consider past decisions made in other district courts or far away circuit courts as a guiding bases for a decision
13
New cards
Precedent
A ruiling that firmly establishes a legal principle
14
New cards
John Roberts
Current chief justice of the supreme court, nominated by George Bush
15
New cards
State Decisis
The concept of “let the decision stand” that governs common law
16
New cards
Concurring Opinion
Justices that agree with the majority and join that vote but have reservations about the majorities legal reasoning
17
New cards
Dissenting Opinions
Those who vote against the majority
18
New cards
Liberal Constructionist
Interprets the Constitution as a living document and takes into account changes and social conditions since ratification
19
New cards
Majority Opinion
Reflect the court’s ruling
20
New cards
Petition for Certiorari
A brief arguing why the lower court erred
21
New cards
Rule of Four
four of the nine supreme court judges must agree to hear a case
22
New cards
Strict Constructionist
Interprets the Constitution in its original context
23
New cards
Robert Bork
Reagan’s supreme court nominee calls for the term “to bork which is destroying a nominee due to character background”
24
New cards
Merrick Garland
Denied a supreme court nomination due to the senate stating they will wait for the new president before voting for the new justice
25
New cards
Judicial Activism
When judges strike down laws or reverse public policy
26
New cards
Judicial Restraint
Court should not dispute/interfere with created policy. Elected legislatures should create policy
27
New cards
“Nucleur Option”
A procedure only for senate, that allows senate to overide a standing rule with only a simple majority rather than a super majority
28
New cards
Senatorial Courtesy
Taking into consideration the senators from the presidents home state when selecting federal judges
29
New cards
Standing
The requirement for bringing a case to court
30
New cards
Clarence Thomas
President Bush;s controversial supreme court nomination, very conservative, accused of sexual misconduct