1/6
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Privilege against compulsory self-incrimination
1. Scope—extends to civil and criminal actions
2. Waiver—defendant taking stand on own behalf cannot claim privilege against crossexamination on matters reasonably related to subject matter of direct examination
Fifth Amendment in a police interrogation context
Trickery
Invoking Miranda rights
Miranda waiver
Custodial interrogation of minors
Corpus delicti rule
Fifth Amendment in a police interrogation context - Trickery
—statement obtained from deceptive tactics; DE courts consider whether trickery so coercive it overcame defendant’s will to make rational choice
Fifth Amendment in a police interrogation context - Invoking Miranda rights
Clarification—if suspect ambiguously invokes, police must clarify suspect’s intention in noncoercive and nonintimidating way before continuing
Consulting opportunity—if lawyer arrives before or during custodial interrogation, police must inform suspect of lawyer’s presence and give opportunity to consult lawyer
Presumption—heavy presumption against waiver if: (1) suspect told police he only wanted to communicate through lawyer, (2) suspect has an attorney, and (3) lawyer is present and denied access to client or repeatedly advised police that no interrogation was to occur
Right to remain silent—once invoked, any subsequent statement is only admissible if prosecution shows suspect: (1) reinitiated contact with police and (2) validly waived previous invocation
Fifth Amendment in a police interrogation context - Miranda waiver
—two-part test to determine if waiver was effective; waiver must be: (1) voluntary and (2) made with full awareness of nature of right and consequences of waiver
Fifth Amendment in a police interrogation context - Custodial interrogation of minors
—child’s custodian (e.g., parent) must be notified of child being in custody; absence of custodian during custodial interrogation does not per se invalidate statements (but is considered under totality of circumstances test)
Fifth Amendment in a police interrogation context - Corpus delicti rule
—prosecution must show evidence of a crime independent of defendant’s confession