1/88
Profit maximisation, perfect competition, monopolies
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
revenues definition
payments that firms receive when they sell the goods and services that they produce.
total revenue vs average revenue
total revenue = PxQ → amount of money a firm gets when they sell a g/s
average revenue = TR/Q = P → revenue per unit output sold
marginal revenue
formula = change in TR/ change in quantity
additional revenue from producing one more unit of output
average + marginal revenue for price taker firms
AR=MR=P
straight horizontal line → price is constant

price taker vs price maker
price taker → cannot control the price → exists with perfect competition (price does not change with output)
price maker → can set their own price → monopoly, oligopoly, monopolistic competition (price changes with output)
total revenue for price taker firms
increases by the same amount

Average revenue + marginal revenue for price maker firms
MR is twice as steep as AR
MR is negative → firm is loosing revenue with each extra unit of output
when MR = 0 TR is at maximum

Total revenue for price maker firms
revenue is maximized at the local maximum (where MR=0)

PED and TR
PED is rel. elastic → price increases → TR increases
PED is rel. inelastic → price increases → TR decreases
costs of production definition
payments by firms to obtain and use factors of production in their production process
fixed vs variable costs definition
fixed - costs that don’t change with output (short run)
variable - costs that change with output
Total costs
total amount of money spent on producing a certain quantity
= fixed + variable costs
Average costs
costs per unit output produced
average fixed costs + average variable costs
Marginal cost
additional costs to produce an extra unit of output
= change in total costs / change in quantity
the relationship between average costs + marginal costs in the short run
MC<AC → average cost is falling
MC>AC → average cost is rising
MC intersect AC at AC’s minimum

what is meant by short run vs long run
short run - at least one factor of production is fixed
long run - all factors of production are variable
total product vs marginal product
total - the total quantity of output produced by a firm
marginal - the additional output that results from one additional variable input
relationship between marginal and total product
when MP=0, TP is maximized
when MP is rising TP rises faster
when MP is falling TP falls slower
relationship between marginal and average product
MP>AP → AP increases
MP<AP → AP decrease

law of diminishing marginal returns
as more and more units of a variable input are added to one or more fixed inputs the marginal product of the variable input at first increases, but then it reaches a point after which the marginal product of the variable input starts to decrease
relation of marginal costs to diminishing marginal returns
marginal product increases → marginal cost decreases
when marginal product is at maximum → marginal costs is at minimum
when marginal product falls → marginal costs increase

marginal costs and the firms supply curve
upward sloping part of MC curve = supply curve
the firm can only produce more output if the price of the good increases to cover the extra cost of each extra unit produced
explicit vs implicit costs
explicit - direct, out-of-pocket payments that businesses actually make, e.g wages, rent, materials, and utility bills.
implicit - opportunity costs - value of resources the firm already owns but could have used elsewhere (not used when calculating accounting profit)
profit formulas
revenue - costs of production
economic profit = total revenues - economic costs
total revenue - sum of explicit costs - implicit costs
(economic costs = implicit + explicit costs)
profit maximization
producing a level of output where the difference between total revenue and total costs is the largest
largest amount of profit
rewards for f.o.p
land - rent
labour - wages
capital - interest
enterprise - profit
→ the costs of a business
normal profit
the minimum amount of revenue that the firm must receive in order to keep the business running
TR=TC
normal profit also = the opportunity cost of running the business instead of doing something else.
abnormal/supernormal profit
TR>TC
more than normal profit is made
losses
TR<TC
less than normal profit is made
profit maximization - price takers
AR>AC → abnormal profit
AR=AC → normal profit
MC=MR → profit maximization

minimizing loss - price takers
when AR<AC
MC=MR → minimize loss

profit maximization - price makers
MR=MC
as long as MR>MC the profit can be increased by producing more units until the last unit of output brings not more profit (MC=MR)

types of market structure
perfect competition
monopolies
oligopoly
monopolistic competition
(monopolies, oligopoly, monopolistic competition → imperfect competition)
conditions for normal profit + profit maximization
normal profits : AC=AR
Profit maximisation : MC=MR
conditions for productive + allocative efficiency
productive efficiency - AC=MC
allocative efficiency= S=D/MC=AR
Assumptions for perfect competition
large number of small firms + many small households/consumers
no barriers to market entry/exit
firms are price takers : AR=MR=P
homogenous/identical products → perfect substitutes for each other
perfect information about costs, revenues, etc.
examples of perfect competition
there are no existing perfectly competitive markets but a few come close:
agricultural markets (wheat,corn)
online market places - eBay, Amazon
Raw material markets
what happens in the market when businesses in perfect competition are making abnormal profit
more businesses enter the market due to perfect information + no barriers to entry → lowers price
This happens until the AR curve is a tangent to the AC curve
effect of more firms entering the market in perfect competition
increase in supply → increase in competition as goods are perfect substitutes for each other → fall in price due to excess supply → expansion of demand
each firm now has lower AR + MR → abnormal profit falls
perfect competition short run - allocative efficiency, normal profit, profit maximization, productive efficiency
Yes:
allocative efficiency
profit maximisation
No:
normal profit
productive efficiency
perfect competition long run - allocative efficiency, normal profit, profit maximization, productive efficiency
all are present
allocative efficiency
normal profit
profit maximisation
productive efficiency
→ stable
benefits of perfect competition
allocative efficiency
low prices for consumers due to absence of abnormal profits
closing down of inefficient producers due to competition
market responds to consumer tastes - changes in consumer tastes → change in market demand + market price
limitations of perfect competition
relies unrealistic assumptions that are rarely met in the real world
no economies of scale - firms are too small
lack of product variety - firms produce homogenous products but consumers prefer variety
limited ability to engage in product development - lack of abnormal profit → cannot fund research + innovation
Monopoly definition
A market structure with a single supplier of a good or service and that has control over the market price. The firm sells a unique product and is protected by high barriers to entry
characteristics/assumptions of a monopoly
single supplier = market supply
price maker
High barriers to entry + exit
Differentiated goods and services without close substitutes.
Average revenue curve for monopolies
= market demand due to monopoly being the single supplier.
Why do barriers of entry + exit arise in monopolies
economies of scale
legal barriers
control of essential resources
natural monopoly
Aggressive tactics
economies of scale - Monopolies
= lower average costs of production in the long run resulting from being a large firm.
occurs in the downward sloping part of a firms long run average revenue curve.
Occurs due to :
bulk buying
specialisation of labour
lower costs for marketing
lower borrowing costs

legal barriers - Monopolies
applies to all imperfect competition
patent = temporary monopoly for an inventor
Licences - granted by governments for a certain profession/industry
copyrights = temporary monopoly for artistic output
tariffs/quotas
all limit competition and so create market power
aggressive tactics (limit pricing) - Monopolies
monopolist sets a price with which any new market entry cannot compete with and therefore preventing entry to the market
illegal
natural monopoly
a situation where a single firm will be able to supply a greater amount of output at a lower price than if more than one firm were to compete
due to high capital costs + high economies of scale enjoyed by monopolist.
Example of natural monopoly
Bratislava water company (BVS)
builds an expensive pipeline network. If multiple firms were to compete each firm would have to build its own pipelines leading to higher costs, inefficiencies and waste of resources.
how to know if a firm is a natural monopoly on a graph
market demand for a g/s intersects LRAC (long-run average costs) whilst it is falling.

how can natural monopolies stop being ‘natural’
if changing technologies create conditions which allow new competitor firms to enter the industry and begin production at a relatively low cost.
advantages of monopolies
abnormal profit → funds for R&D→ can boost innovation
economies of scale → lower costs of production (see graph in notes)
Natural monopolies - can supply a greater amount + at lower price
disadvantages of monopolies
limited choice for consumers due to lack of competition
Higher prices for consumers (profit maximising monopolist)
Allocatively inefficient → creates DWL
Productively inefficient market outcome
X inefficiency → average costs are not as low as AC curve due to lack of competition
Mylan (Epipens) monopoly
Pharmaceutical monopoly (over 90% market share)
ad : abnormal profits allow for R&D which helps improve epipens
dis : increased the price by over 400% → low income earners struggle to afford Epipens
why are monopolies allocatively inefficient
P>MC at profit-maximising level of output
there is an underallocation of resources
market power definition
the ability of a firm to charge a price greater than marginal costs (P>MC)
can only occur when a firm experiences a downwards sloping demand curve (imperfect competition)
characteristics of an oligopoly
small number of large firms
high barriers to entry - all barriers as in monopoly + high start up costs (spend a lot on product differentiation + advertising)
interdependence - decisions made by one firm greatly impact other firms in the industry
products are differentiated
imperfect information
Quite strong market power (depends on concentration of market which can be found through concentration ratio)
affect of interdependence on oligopoly behaviour
Strategic behaviour
Conflicting incentives : incentive to cheat, incentive to collude
strategic behaviour oligopoly
Firms use analysis (like game theory) to predict competitor reactions, deciding whether to cooperate or compete.
conflicting incentives - oligopoly
incentive to collude - fix price + reduce quantity → maximize profits for industry as a whole
incentive to cheat - want to capture a portion of rivals’ market share + profits → increasing profits at the expense of other firms
Types of oligopoly
collusive oligopoly : firms overcome uncertainty by charging the same price or splitting the market geographically → act like a monopolist.
non-collusive oligopoly : businesses charge similar prices (competitive pricing) use non-price competition e.g design,durability,customer service
types of collusive oligopolies
formal collusion (cartel) : firms openly agree on a price to charge consumers.
tacit collusion : firms charge the same price without a formal agreement → price leadership (dominating firm decides the market price with other firms following). if price leadership is done to restrict competition = illegal.
advantages for firms in a cartel
increase in market power → can influence price
increased profits due to higher price
elimination of competition → remove uncertainty
game theory definition
a mathematical technique analysing the behaviour of decision-makers that are dependent on each other and who use strategic behaviour to try and anticipate the behaviour of their rivals.
prisoner’s dilemma
2 rational decision makers that use strategic behaviour to maximize profits collectively end up being worse off. (at Nash equilibrium)
prisoner’s dilemma oligopoly
the incentive to cheat for each firm makes it most likely that both firms will cut prices leading to price competition and a failure of the collusive agreement
payoff matrix definition
shows all the possible combinations of outcomes of different decisions made by the players in game theory
price war definition
competitive price cutting by firms (usually oligopoly) as each one tries to capture market shares from rival firms → lower profits for both firms
why are cartels difficult to maintain
incentive to cheat
cost differences between firms - AC differences make it hard to agree on a price
number of firms - a lot of firms → difficult to come to an agreement
possibility of price war -
non-collusive oligopolies and competition
avoid price competition due to wanting to avoid price wars
compete with non-price factors such as advertising, branding, warranty, packaging,etc. → create high barriers to entry through strong product differentiation
why is non-price competition important to oligopolies
oligopolies have large profits which they can use to fund things such as branding and R&D
development of new products → increase in market power → demand for firms’ product becomes less price elastic → increased sales + profits
product differentiation → increase in profit due to it taking time for rivals to develop new competitive products
oligopolies + stable prices
fear of loosing sales revenue/market share if price rises
fear of price war when cutting prices
“price a” may remain profit maximising price even if marginal costs increase
concentration ratio
a measure of how much an industry’s production is concentrated amongst the industry’s largest firms
measures percentage of output produced by the largest firms in an industry
used to indicate degree of competition/market power
higher ratio = more market power = less competition
market concentration
the degree to which a market is dominated by a small number of large firms controlling the market
measured using concentration ratio
concentration ratio disadvantages
do not reflect competition from abroad
do not reflect competition from other industries that act as substitutes
do not distinguish between sizes of largest firms
no indication of importance in global market
Advantages of oligopolies
economies of scale → lowers costs of production (only benefit consumers if producers lower price as a result)
promotes product + process innovation → dynamic efficiency → falling long run costs of production
advertising + other marketing activities create jobs + income
advertising provides information to consumers + reduces search costs
Disadvantages of oligopolies
allocative inefficiency + welfare loss
higher prices + lower quantities compared to perfect competition
loss in consumer surplus due to high price P>MC
less efficient/higher production costs due to lack of competition
too much product choice → consumers are overwhelmed + creates disutility
example of collusive oligopolies
OPEC - Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
price fixing + output restriction
limited firms : OPEC nations
examples of non-collusive oligopoly markets
smartphone market (apple vs samsung)
softdrinks market
assumptions of monopolistic competition
large number of firms + consumers
low barriers to entry
perfect knowledge
differentiated products (real/imagined) → price setting power
downward sloping demand curve that is relatively price elastic due to competition (more elastic than monopoly but less elastic than perfect competition)

how can product differentiation be achieved in monopolistic competition
physical differences
quality differences
location
services
product image
price vs non-price competition
price - firm lowers prices to attract customers from rival firms thus increasing sales at the expense of other firms. (occurs in monopolistic or perfect competition)
non-price - firms use methods other than price reductions to attract customers from rival firms (occurs in oligopoly or monopolistic competition)
SR vs LR of firms in monopolistic competition
abnormal profits attract new entries reducing AR/MR as demand is spread over more firms
short run losses → firms leave the industry → AR/MR increases due to demand being spread over less firms
both continue until AR=AC/AR is tangent to AC and all firms make normal profit.
market outcomes present in monopolistic competition
profit maximisation - yes
normal profit - yes
productive efficiency - no
allocative efficiency - no, P>MC/MB>MC → underallocation of resources
advantages of monopolistic competition
differentiated products → choice + gain in customer utility + satisfies needs + wants better
advertising provides information → reduces search costs
marketing activities + advertising create jobs + income
cheaper market entry → increases competition + the need to innovate in order for firms to stay competitive (dynamic efficiency)
disadvantages of monopolistic competition
productively inefficient
allocatively inefficient → DWL even in LR although less than in oligopoly
higher prices compared to perfect competition due to promotional activities which raise average costs
inability to generate economies of scale due to small size compared to oligopoly + monopoly
firms often lack sufficient funds for R&D → product development is difficult