Quantitative Demand Analysis and Production Costs, Quiz 4 econ, Chapter 7 & 8 Market Structures and Economic Concepts

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/82

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

83 Terms

1
New cards

Elasticity Formula

%ΔG/%ΔS. Greater than 1 is highly responsive, smaller than is slightly 1 responsive.

2
New cards

elasticity = 1

unitary

3
New cards

elasticity < 1

inelastic (not responsive)

4
New cards

Elasticity > 1

price is elastic

5
New cards

Total Revenue (TR)

P×Q.

6
New cards

Average Product of Labor (APL)

Q/L.

7
New cards

Average Product of Capital (APK)

Q/K.

8
New cards

Marginal Product of Labor (MPL)

ΔQ/ΔL or dQ/dL.

9
New cards

How to solve marginal product and capital questions

you just take the derivative in respect to k (capital) or L labor)

10
New cards

Value of Marginal Product (VMPL)

MPL×P.

11
New cards

Marginal Rate of Technical Substitution (MRTS)

MPL/MPK.

12
New cards

Total Cost (TC)

FC+VC(Q).

13
New cards

Marginal Cost (MC)

ΔTC/ΔQ.

14
New cards

Average Fixed Cost (AFC)

FC/Q.

15
New cards

Average Variable Cost (AVC)

VC/Q.

16
New cards

Average Total Cost (ATC)

TC/Q.

17
New cards

Total Variable Cost

Use AVC formula which is AVC=TC/Q plug in what you know.

18
New cards

Cost Function

Mathematical relationship that relates cost to the cost minimizing output associated with an isoquant.

19
New cards

determinants of Elasticity

1) Availability of substitutes

2) Time

3) Budget large ticket item or small ticket item

20
New cards

Short run

One factor held constant

21
New cards

Long run

everything is variable

22
New cards

Sunk Cost

-cost that is forever lost after it has been paid (like paying for a super bowl commercial)

23
New cards

VMPL(profit max input) must equal

wage

24
New cards

next best option for VMPL

≥ wage

25
New cards

Oligopoly

Few Firms, Interdependent

26
New cards

Sweezy

o The firms produce differentiated products

o Each firm believes its rivals will cut their prices in response to a price reduction but will not raise their prices in response to a price increase

27
New cards

Cournot (quantity battle)

o The firms produce differentiated products or homogenous(identical) products

o Each firm believes rivals will hold their output constant if it charges its output

-Each firms marginal revenue is impacted by the other. firms output decision

28
New cards

Stackelberg (price leadership)

o The firms produce differentiated products or homogenous products

o A single firm (the leader) chooses an output before all other firms choose their outputs

o All other firms (the followers) take as given the output of the leader and choose output that maximize profits given the leaders output

29
New cards

Betrand (price war)

o The firms produce identical products at a constant marginal cost

o Firms engage in price competition and react optimally to prices charged by competitors

o Consumers have perfect information and there are no transaction costs

-This war would come to an end when the price each firm charges equals the marginal cost

30
New cards

Collusion/Collusive(cartel)

o When firms openly and formally get together at united and set price and quantity

-They are illegal in the us

-Cheating: part of the agreement is for you and I to reduce and quantity and charge higher price, if one cheats and decides to increase qunaity and decrease price without telling it collapses. (this happens all the time)

31
New cards

Oligopoly solutions in terms of profit:

Profit of collusion >Profit of Cournot > Profit of stackleberg

> Betrand is the lowest

32
New cards

1st degree price discrimination

the practice of charging each consumer the maximum price he or she would be willing to pay for each unit of the good purchased

33
New cards

Implication and problem of 1st degree price discrimination

o the firm extracts all surplus from consumers and earns the highest possible profit

o managers rarely know each consumers maximum willingness to pay for each unit of the product (they need a lot of information)

34
New cards

Second degree price discrimination

posting a discrete schedule (2 or 3 different prices) of declining prices for different ranges of quantity. Available for everyone

35
New cards

Implication of Second degree price discrimination

firm extracts some surplus from consumers without needing to know the identity of various consumers' demand

36
New cards

Third degree price discrimination

1. charging different prices based on systematic differences in demand across demographic consumer groups

-Have to have two distinct group of customers (old vs young, male vs female)

-Have to have two different elasticities

-They should be separable

-No possibility of resale

37
New cards

Implications of Third degree price discrimination

o Marginal revenue will be different for each group. That is, if there are two groups MR1 > MR2 for example

38
New cards

Two Part Pricing

o A pricing strategy whereby a firm with market power charges a per unit price equal to marginal cost plus a fixed fee equal to the consumer surplus each consumer receives at this per unit price

o Like a membership thing, or an entrance fee and then buying this at the place

39
New cards

Block Pricing

a pricing strategy in which identical products are packaged together in order to enhance profits by forcing customers to make an all or none decision to purchase

-Ex) we will just have one price at 24 dollars

40
New cards

Which pricing strategy extracts all the consumer surplus

- 1st degree

- Two part pricing

- Block pricing

41
New cards

Cross subsidies:

a pricing strategy in which profits gained from the sale of one product are used to subsidize sales of a related product

Ex) wanting to ski but not having the equipment so you rent it. you spend 100 dollars on the ticket but 200 dollars on the equipment, they make money on the rent equipment rather than the ticket

42
New cards

Transfer Pricing

A pricing strategy in whihc a firm sets the internal price at which an upstream divison sells an input to a downstream divison

Ex) a parent company manufacturing goods in a high-tax country and selling them to a subsidiary in a low-tax country

43
New cards

Four-firm concentration ratio

Measures market share of top four firms.

44
New cards

C4(four firm) Ratio

(S1+S2+S3+S4)/Sr.

45
New cards

Highly concentrated market for C4

ratio close to 1

46
New cards

Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI)

Square the market shares; ranges 0-10,000. 3450 means it needs to be watched closely (not comeptitive) the further away you are from 0 you are the more concentrated the market

47
New cards

Rothschild Index

Measures market concentration based on elasticities. Elasticity of total or Market / Elasticity of 1 firm

48
New cards

Lerner Index

= (P - MC) / P. o Closer to one you are concentrated, closer to 0 less concentrated

49
New cards

Markup formula

= 1 / (1 - L); indicates that the Lerner Index is (5) times the margina cost

50
New cards

Deadweight Loss (DW) Index

Measures social welfare changes with output increase. If you are closer to 1 firm expands its output and social welfare will improve, if DW is closer to 0 social welfare does not change

51
New cards

Barriers to Entry

- Capital Requirement: requires an enormous a lot of capital so companies cant come in

- Economy of Scale

- Patent: legal barrier that stops a firm

52
New cards

Vertical Merger

beginning and end of the production process all carried out by a single firm.

Example: Like a farmer growing wheat going all the way to the bakers.

53
New cards

Horizontal Merger

merging 2 or more similar final productions into a single firm:

Example: Like 20 lawyers forming a law firm

54
New cards

Conglomerate Merger

- Integration of 2 or more different product lines into a single firm. These companies don't have no relation.

Example: Warren buffet: buying anything and everything doesn't have to do with each other

55
New cards

Reasons For mergers

-Decrease cost,

- Recap the benefits of Economies of scale: will lead to less Competition but benefit them as they can share things

-Increase market power, HHI will go up

56
New cards

Perfect Competition

- : consumers are king, and firms are the servant, and markets are the agent. consumers are doing very good(farmers a good example)

57
New cards

Perfect Competition Must satisfy the following conditions:

- Must be identical( no difference among the products)

-Many buyers and many sellers

-Free Entry, Free exit (no barriers of entry/exit) most important characteristic, makes each buyer large or small

- Perfect information (both buyers and sellers know all the information)

- No transaction cost (you don't need a 3rd party to buy)

58
New cards

Monopoly

Single firm dominates market, sets prices and cannot charge any price Example: Souther california of Edison

59
New cards

Why do we have monopoly:

- Technology: Like Microsoft

- Geographical: if you are the only one in the area (like southern California Edison)

- Resource ownership (Like the diamond company debeers owning 70% of the diamonds)

- Economies of Scale: (like GMC they produce so many cars as they are very big)

- Patent: Legal barriers

- Cost complentarity:

- Economies of scope: the monopoly is so big they can make multiple products. (Like car compaies making trucks sedans vans)

60
New cards

Monopolistic Competition

- Products are not Identical

-Many buyers and many sellers

-Free Entry, Free exit (no barriers of entry/exit) most important characteristic, makes each buyer large or small

- Perfect information (both buyers and sellers know all the information)

- No transaction cost (you don't need a 3rd party to buy)

61
New cards

Monopolistic competition; reinvention:

Create a new product or new concept, to make profit positive again

62
New cards

Profit Maximizing Output

Where MR equals MC for maximum profit.

63
New cards

Perfect Competition to Monpoly will lead to:

- Higher prices

- Lower quantities

- Lower Consumer surplus

- Dead weight Loss

64
New cards

Consumer Surplus

Difference between willingness to pay and market price.

65
New cards

Law of demand

Price and quantity move in the opposite direction

Price goes up demand goes down, price goes down demand goes up

66
New cards

Consumer Surplus:

: willingness to pay-what consumer actually pays

67
New cards

Law of supply

As the price of a good rises, the quantity supplied of the good rises, holding other factors affecting supply constant. Price down, Supply down. It moves the same way

Changing only price leads to changes in quantity supplied

68
New cards

Producer Surplus:

the amount of producers receive in excess of the amount necessary to induce them to produce the good. (profit basically)

69
New cards

Market Equilibirum

: A place there is no tendency for movement, the market will clear, and quantity demanded = quantity supplied

Below the equilibrium is a shortage, above the equilibrium is a surplus, at the equilibrium quantiy demanded=quantitysupplied

70
New cards

Price ceiling

: Maximum legal price that can be charged in a market (shown below the equilbrium on the graph because of a shortage)

71
New cards

Price floor

Minimum legal price that can be charged in a market (shown above the equilbrium as there is a surplus)

72
New cards

Social Welfare

Consumer surplus + producer surplus

73
New cards

What is Market failure?

where private market fails to come up with an appropriate solution.

Exists because of a lack of clearly defined property rights(right to use, right to exclude, right to resell)  which leads to market failure

Resolve by assigning property rights

74
New cards

Five faces of Market Failure

Market power(monopoly), externality, public good, incomplete information, common resources.

75
New cards

MB >MC

Q goes up so continue what you are doing

76
New cards

MB < MC

Q goes down, cut back

77
New cards

MB = MC

Optimal point

78
New cards

Demand Shifters

1.        Income

a.        Normal good: Income goes up you buy more, if income goes down you buy less of it. Ex)steak

b.       Inferior good: Your income goes up and you buy less of it. Ex) A in n out burger

2.        Prices of related goods:

a.        Substitute goods:

b.       Complement goods:

3.        Advertising and consumer tastes

a.   Informative advertising: something new, new ideas new concepts

b. Persuasive advertising(Brand wash): keep advertising that you basically stop thinking and end up buying the product.

4.        Population: Population increases = D1 demand will go up

Less people: D2 demand will go down

5.        Consumer Expectations

-              If you think an hamburger will make you look bad, D2, demand will go down

-              If you think an hamburger will make you look good, D1, demand will go up

79
New cards

Supply Shifters

1.        Input prices: If input prices (like minimum wage) goes up Supply goes up, S2

2.        Technology: Better technology = S1

3.        government regulation: Gonna cost you money, S2

4.        Number of firms:

a.        Entry: more firms come in, S1

b.       Exit: start to shut down, S2

5.        Substitutes in production: many elements are shared(substitutable) like some parts of cars. More substitutes in production, S1

6.        Taxes: S2

a.        Excise tax: a tax on each unit of output sold(per pack of cigarettes, a cup of coffee), where tax revenue is collected from the supplier

7.        Producer expectations: If you expect a lot of traveling in may, gas will go up: S1

   If you expect in the winter less people will eat ice cream: S2

Thanksgiving turkey: S1

80
New cards

Conditon 1 (Celler-Kefavuer)

Merger that increases HHI by less than 100 or leads to an unconcentrated market (post-merger HHI <1500) is typically permitted

81
New cards

2nd condition(Celler-Kefavuer)

Markets are considered modertaely concentrated when the post merger results in: 1500<HHi<2500, mergers with an HHI in this range and increase the HHI by more than 100 points potentially raise antitrust concerns

82
New cards

3rd condition (Celler-Kefavuer)

Markets are considereed highly concentrated when the post merger HHI > 2500. mergers with an HHI in this range and increase the HHI between 100-200 points potentially raise antitrust concerns

83
New cards

4th condition (Celler-Kefavuer)

If a merger increases the HHI by more than 200 points and leads to a highly concentrate market, it is presumed to enhance market power