1/7
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Robinson
Conviction was quashed, no theft under section 2(1)(a). Had an honest belief he was entitled to the money.
R v Waters
Condition for returning the phone could have been fulfilled, no theft.
Dawson and James
A nudge can amount to force.
B&R v Dpp
Victim doesn’t need to be in fear of D’s actions.
RP and others vv DPP
May not be robbery when force is used against the object.
Lockley
Stole beer and assaulted shopkeeper to escape. Still robbery as it was part of a continuing act.
Hale
Stole jewellery then tied victim up. Still robbery as it was part of a continuing act.
R v Vinall
Didn’t use force to steal, was an afterthought so not robbery, bicycle.