1/24
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
The Federal Judiciary
Responsible for interpreting the law of the nation
Judicial independence
Justices being impractical and united to any one person or intrest
What is an independent judiciary essential for?
An independent judiciary is essential for preserving liberty and upholding the checks and balances of Scoutus
What is article 3 of the constitution?
The supremacy clause over matters involving federal law
Is there formal qualifications of federal judiciary
There are no formal qualifications to become a federal judiciary (you don’t have to be a lawyer)
What are the factors that nomonies are considered by
experience
Ethical integrity
Legal accomplish
Race
Ethnicity
gender
Judiciary act of 1789
Congress created lower federal judiciary the number of justices on the scoutus
Ratification
federalist reply: opponents of the coutus were concerned about potential abuses of scoutus
as federal power grew individual rights and states power would diminish
Federalist paper 78
Argument by Alexander H that the federal judiciary would be unlikely to infringe upon rights and liberties but would serve as a check on the other 2 branches of government.
Criminal Law
A category of law covering actions determined to harm community
Civil law
Category of law covering cases involving private rights and relationships between individuals and groups
State courts
Handle the vast majority of cases involving private rights the US handle both criminal and civil laws
Rule of four
4 or more justices vote to near cases on appeal
Granted writt of certiorari if heard
Decide to review the case/ argument (briefs) both sides
Precident
Act as a basis for future decisions of similar circumstances
Stature decision
The practice of letting a previous legal decision stand
Affirmed
Confirming the courts decidion
Reserved
Overturning the district court decision
Remanding
Sent back to the lower court for reconsideration
Judicial Restraint
Justices should be cautious in overturning laws created by the people to avoid judicial review
Judicial activism
should weld the power of judicial review sometimes creating bold new polices This protects minority by striking down majority opinion
Limitations
Limits power on the supreme courts checks on court
Congress writes legislation modifying the impact of what?
Decisions
Judicial branch lacks…
Power of implementation
What do other branches rely on other branches for?
Oversee decisions