Rehabilitation Assessment, Outcome Measurement, and Progression

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/77

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 1:38 AM on 9/15/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

78 Terms

1
New cards

injury evals intend to answer what question?

what is the problem?

2
New cards

primary focus of injury evals

  • identify red flags

  • perform special tests

  • assess acute impairments (swelling, deformity, bleeding, loss of function)


3
New cards

immediate decision making in injury evals

  • determine whether athlete can safely return to play or needs removal.


  • Guide initial first aid and emergency care (splinting, immobilization, transport).


  • Provide communication to the healthcare team, coaches, and family.



4
New cards

rehab evals intend to answer what question

“Where are we now, and how do we get better?”

5
New cards

ongoing systematic assessments performed in rehab evals

  • pain

  • ROM

  • strength

  • functional performance

  • patient reported outcomes


6
New cards

purpose of rehab evals

  • Identify barriers to healing (pain, stiffness, weakness, poor adherence).

  • Set short- and long-term goals with measurable benchmarks.

  • Progress exercise prescription safely (e.g., increase load, complexity).


7
New cards

why are rehab evals repeated regularly?

Track improvements or setbacks over time.

Support clinical decisions on return-to-play readiness.

Communicate progress with the patient, physician, and healthcare team.

8
New cards

Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS, 0–10)

patient rates average, worst, or current pain.

9
New cards

Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 0–100 mm)

patient marks pain intensity on a continuous line

10
New cards

meaningful change in NPRS

2-point reduction

11
New cards

Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK)

  • Assesses fear of movement or reinjury.

  • Higher scores may reflect greater movement avoidance or hesitation.

  • Findings may support graded exposure to feared activities, setting progressive achievable goals, and providing education and confidence-building strategies


12
New cards

Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)

Assesses pain-related thoughts:

  • Rumination: difficulty shifting attention away from the pain

  • Magnification: perceiving the pain or its potential consequences as especially threatening

  • Helplessness: feeling that there is little they can do to control or improve the situation

Higher scores may indicate that pain is having a greater cognitive or emotional impact.

Findings may support pain education, reassurance, graded activity, and interdisciplinary referral when appropriate.


13
New cards

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

screens for symptoms associated with depression

14
New cards

Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)

screens for symptoms associated with anxiety

15
New cards

LEFS

general lower-extremity function

16
New cards

FAAM

foot/ankle function — ADL + Sport

17
New cards

IKDC

knee symptoms and function

18
New cards

KOOS

knee symptoms, ADLs, sport/recreation, quality of life

19
New cards

DASH / QuickDASH

upper-extremity function

20
New cards

SPADI

shoulder pain and disability

21
New cards

role of PROMs in rehab

Establish a patient-reported baseline.

Track meaningful change throughout recovery.

Help identify differences between objective performance and perceived function.

Support goal setting, progression, and return-to-activity decisions.

22
New cards

Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID)

Smallest change considered meaningful to the patient.

Helps determine whether a change in score reflects a meaningful improvement in symptoms or function.

“Does this change matter to the patient?”

23
New cards

Minimal Detectable Change (MDC)

Smallest change that exceeds expected measurement error.

Helps determine whether an observed difference is likely a true change rather than normal measurement variability.

“Is this change greater than measurement error?”

24
New cards

soft end-feel

soft-tissue compression

25
New cards

firm end-feel

muscle/capsule/ligament stretch

26
New cards

hard end-feel

bone-to-bone contact

27
New cards

empty end-feel

pain stops motion before endpoint

28
New cards

injury eval ROM

What does motion tell us about the injury and safety?

29
New cards

rehab eval ROM

What remains limited, is it improving, and is the patient ready to progress?

30
New cards

Universal goniometer

  • Most common and versatile clinical instrument

  • Large protractor with measurements in degrees


31
New cards

inclinometer

• More precise measurement with high reliability often used in research settings.

• Uses gravity to determine joint or segment position

• Particularly useful for spinal motion

32
New cards

selection of measurement tool depends on

Joint being measured

Required precision

Clinical setting

Ability to reproduce the measurement

33
New cards

why use goniometery?

  • Provides objective, quantifiable measurement of joint angles.

  • Enhances reliability beyond visual estimates.

  • Standardized tool for documentation and communication.


34
New cards

goniometry standard measurement procedure

Align:

Fulcrum: near joint axis

Stationary arm: longitudinal axis of proximal segment

Moving arm: longitudinal axis of distal segment

35
New cards

limitations of goniometry

requires consistency in placement and patient positioning for accuracy

36
New cards

purpose of girth and circumference measurements

Assesses swelling (edema) and muscle atrophy/hypertrophy.

Provides objective data to support clinical decisions.

37
New cards

methods for girth and circumference measurements

• Use a flexible tape measure; measure in centimeters.

• Take at consistent landmarks (e.g., 10 cm above patella, mid-biceps).

• Compare to contralateral limb.

38
New cards

circumference and swelling

helps monitor resolution of acute injury and guide progression.

39
New cards

circumference and atrophy

identifies disuse or weakness; helps justify strengthening emphasis.

40
New cards

circumference and hypertrophy

tracks gains in rehab, especially in return-to-play protocols.

41
New cards

girth measurement reliability

  • Use the same anatomical landmark every time.

  • Apply a consistent amount of tape tension.

  • Maintain the same patient position and muscle state.

  • When possible, have the same clinician repeat measurements.

  • Do not assume changes in circumference directly represent equivalent changes in muscle size or strength.


42
New cards

inclinometer uses

  • measure the angle of a body segment relative to gravity

    • Uses gravity as the reference rather than requiring alignment of two arms across a joint

** spinal ROM and movements where traditional goniometer alignment is difficult


43
New cards

inclinometer basic procedure

  • Position patient consistently

  • Place device at the specified anatomical landmark

  • Establish/record starting position

  • Have patient perform the desired movement

  • Record the change in angle


44
New cards

dual inclinometry

Two inclinometers may be used to isolate motion occurring between body segments

45
New cards

recording goniometry measurements

0°–180° system

Anatomic neutral is recorded as 0°

Movement away from neutral is recorded in degrees.

46
New cards

goniometer documentation

Joint and motion

Right/left side

AROM or PROM

Degrees achieved

Pain or symptoms

Compensation when present

ex. Right knee AROM: 0°–125°, pain-free

47
New cards

strength assessment in rehab

  • Identifies strength deficits that may limit function or delay return to activity.

  • Provides objective benchmarks for progression and return-to-sport decisions


48
New cards

purpose of MMT

Quick, practical gross strength screen. Useful early in rehabilitation. Limited sensitivity for smaller strength deficits, especially in stronger patients

49
New cards

purpose of HHD

Quantifies force output in lbs or Newtons. More sensitive than MMT for detecting side-to-side deficits and change over time. Useful for calculating limb symmetry.

50
New cards

purpose of isokinetic testing

Measures force/torque through a controlled range at a constant angular velocity.

Can assess variables such as peak torque, work, and agonist–antagonist relationships.

Commonly used in later-stage rehabilitation and return-to-sport testing.

51
New cards

limb symmetry index

Compares performance of the involved limb with the uninvolved limb.

LSI = involved ÷ uninvolved × 100

Used with strength and functional tests to quantify side-to-side symmetry. ≥90% symmetry is a commonly used return-to-sport benchmark, but should not be used as the sole clearance criterion.

52
New cards

best practice for reording strength assessments

Record absolute values and symmetry percentages.

Interpret strength alongside movement quality, ROM, symptoms, functional testing, and sport demands.

53
New cards

purpose of functional capacity testing

Assesses the ability to perform integrated, higher-level movement.

Progresses from controlled tasks → activity/sport-specific demands.

Helps evaluate readiness for progression and return to activity/sport.

54
New cards

Y-Balance / Star Excursion

Lower extremity: single-leg balance + multidirectional reach.

Assesses dynamic balance, control, reach performance, and symmetry.

Upper Quarter Y-Balance: closed-chain UE stability, mobility, and control.

55
New cards

hop testing

  • Single, triple, crossover, and timed hop tests.

  • Assesses lower-extremity power, control, endurance, and symmetry.

  • Can calculate LSI between limbs.


56
New cards

jump measures

vertical jump, countermovement jump, drop jump

57
New cards

speed/agility measures

sprint, shuttle, change-of-direction tests

58
New cards

endurance/capacity measures

repeated-sprint, step, running, or work-capacity tests

59
New cards

sport/ task sepcific measures

throwing, cutting, lifting, occupational or position-specific tasks

60
New cards

quantitative factors in functional testing

distance, time, force/power, repetitions, LSI

61
New cards

qualitative factors in functional testing

movement strategy, control, landing mechanics, compensation

62
New cards

SMART goals

specific

measurable

achievable

relevant

time-bound

63
New cards

match load to

Tissue irritability

Stage of healing

Current capacity

Response to loading

Condition/procedure precautions

64
New cards

higher irritability

symptoms easily provoked/slow to settle

→ lower-load, controlled exercise; protected ROM; gradual exposure

65
New cards

lower irritability

symptoms less reactive, recover predictably

→ progress load, ROM, speed, volume, complexity, task specificity

66
New cards

responses to monitor with rehab prorgession

  • Pain during/after exercise

  • Swelling/effusion

  • ROM

  • Strength/fatigue

  • Movement quality/function

  • Next-day response


67
New cards

post op rehab considerations

Protocol and tissue-healing restrictions may override symptoms.

Progression may depend on:

  • Procedure/fixation

  • Weight-bearing status

  • ROM restrictions

  • Surgeon criteria/time from surgery

Low pain ≠ tissue readiness


68
New cards

ongoing reassessment

Monitor response to treatment

Identify progress, plateaus, or regression

Modify interventions and goals

Determine readiness for progression

69
New cards

quick clinical reassessment

  • Current symptoms/pain

  • Response to previous treatment & HEP

  • Swelling, ROM, or other relevant key marker(s)

  • Readiness for planned activity


70
New cards

periodic reassessment

Repeat relevant measures from the baseline evaluation:

  • PROMs

  • ROM

  • Strength

  • Functional performance

Frequency depends on the condition, phase of rehabilitation, goals, and expected rate of change

71
New cards

reasses sooner when…

  • New or worsening symptoms

  • Unexpected regression or change in function

  • Poor response to treatment

  • Approaching a progression or return-to-activity decision

  • Documentation

  • Document measurable progress at appropriate intervals and according to practice-setting, payer, and organizational requirements.


72
New cards

post op patient education

  • Procedure and expected recovery course

  • Weight-bearing/ROM restrictions

  • Precautions and potential complications

  • Early mobility, gait, and equipment needs


73
New cards

home exercise program (HEP) components

  • Individualized

  • Clearly demonstrated

  • Appropriately dosed

  • Progressed as the patient changes

  • Realistic for the patient’s environment and schedule


74
New cards

how to promote adherance to HEP

  • Explain why each exercise matters.

  • Provide clear verbal + written/visual instructions.

  • Confirm understanding and technique.

  • Address barriers and involve the patient in goal setting.

  • Reassess adherence, response, and difficulty at follow-up visits.


75
New cards

components of “subjective”

Pain/symptoms

Tolerance to activity and HEP

Confidence and perceived progress

Changes in daily or sport function

76
New cards

components of “objective”

ROM

Strength

Balance/functional performance

Relevant PROM scores

77
New cards

components of “assessment”

What is improving?

What remains limited?

What may be contributing?

78
New cards

components of “plan”

Update treatment priorities and exercise progression.

Modify HEP as needed.

Identify what will be reassessed next.