1.3.2 Aggreating data

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/4

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 3:59 PM on 7/7/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

5 Terms

1
New cards

Aggregating Data

  • Accurately match losses and premium for the policy

  • Use the most recent data available

  • Minimize the cost associated with gathering and retrieving data

  • Aggregated by calendar year, accident year, policy year and report year

2
New cards

Calendar Year Aggregation

  • groups data according to the calendar year

  • implies that all premiums and exposure were earned during the calendar year

  • Most appropriate for losses that are quicly reported and settled

  • Advantages

    • Quickly available at the end of the calendar year

    • No future development. Premium, exposure and losses are fixed

    • no incremental cost. Data is used for financial purposes

  • Disadvantages

    • Mismatch in timing between premium and losses

      • Premium earned during the calendar year comes from policies in force during the calendar year, which could have been written in the previous calendar year or the current calendar year

      • Losses may include payments and reserve changes on claims from policies issued years ago

      • Inability to capture major developments due to the fixed nature of data

3
New cards

Accident Year Aggregation

  • groups losses according to the accident date.

  • aggregated over a 12 month period based on when the accident ocurred

  • Losses can change after the accident year has ended due to additional claim reports, loss payments, and reserve changes.

  • Advantages

    • Easy to achieve and easy to understand

    • Better match of premiums and losses than calendar year aggregation,

      • losses paid for claims that occurred during the year are compared to premium earned during the same year

    • Useful for identifying the impact of major claim events (e.g., a catastrophe) or changes due to economic or regulatory forces (e.g., inflation and law amendments) on claims experience

  • Disadvantages

    • Requires estimation of future development for known losses that are not closed at the end of the year

    • does note match premiums and losses as well as the policy/underwriting year aggregation method

4
New cards

Policy Year Aggregation

  • groups data according to the year in which the policies were written

  • Considered all premium and losses on a policy written within a 12 month period

  • Premium and exposures are not fixed until all the policies written during the year have expired

  • Losses can change after the accident year has ended due to additional claim reports, loss payments, and reserve changes.

  • Advantages

    • Provides the best match between losses and premiums

    • Useful for identifying the impact of underwriting or pricing changes

  • Disadvantages

    • Longer development time, exposures are not fully earned until after the end of the policy year

    • Difficulty in understanding and isolating the impact of a significant event, such as a major catastrophe or a major court ruling

5
New cards

Report Year Aggregation

  • groups data according to when each claim was reported

  • typically used for claims-made policies, where coverages depend on the report dates of the claims

  • Advantage

    • more stable data than accident year aggregation, as the number of claims is fixed at the end of the year

    Disadvantage

    • Development on incurred but not reported claims is excluded