1/18
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
altruistic behavior
improves fitness of the receiver but harms fitness of the giver
is cooperation evolutionarily stable?
not in one-off interactions but it can be long term
conspecific
belonging to the same species
enforcement
manipulating an individual into doing a certain thing, e.g. teaching a dog not to eat human food
is behavior always done in self-interest?
no, like birds helping carry food or lions allying to challenge the leader
vampire bats and reciprocity
unsuccessful foragers get food from roost mates and will help out later on
is cheating better within groups or between groups?
within
is cooperation better within groups or between groups?
between
cooperative colony in ants
queens work together until workers arrive, then only help their own groups b/c there is no between group benefits
kin selection
helping a related individual indirectly makes sure your genes live on
direct fitness
gained from raising your own offspring
indirect fitness
gained through aiding the survival of your relatives
inclusive fitness
direct fitness + indirect fitness
coefficient of relatedness (r)
the probability that two organisms share identical copies of the same allele by descent
r for siblings
0.5
r for cousins
0.125
r formula
∑(0.5)L where ∑ is the sum of possible paths, 0.5 is the probability of successive genes sharing an allele, L is the number of generational links between two individuals
hamilton’s rule
altruistic behavior can evolve by kin selection if rB-C > 0 where r= coefficient of relatedness, B=benefit to receiver, C=cost to giver
wild turkeys and indirect fitness
pairs of related males ‘hunt’ females, the subordinate male gives up his direct fitness for the indirect fitness of the dominant male