Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Small Business
an independent business with fewer than 100 employees and revenues less than $2 million that is not dominant in its market.
small and mid-sized business
Many firms, such as Natura can be both small and mid-sized businesses
Fewer than 100 employees but more than 2 million in revenue
Whether a company is small or medium sized does not matter unless they are applying for work, grants, or loans
Firms want to reap benefits offered by government to small businesses so they need to know if they qualify
importance of being small business
Whether a company is small or medium sized does not matter unless they are applying for work, grants, or loans
Firms want to reap benefits offered by government to small businesses so they need to know if they qualify
small business contributions to economy
Creating new jobs
Hire people who have difficulty finding jobs at large firms
Creating new industries
Give businesspeople an opportunity and outlet to develop new ideas
Sometimes ideas become whole new industries
New industries can be created when small businesses shift focus to meet consumer interests and preferences
Fintech streamlines loan application processes
Why small businesses fail
Management experience (lack of managerial experience)
inadequate financing
government regulations
Administrative paperwork (small business struggle with compliance due to limited resources)
franchising
a contractual business arrangement between a manufacturer or other supplier and a dealer, such as a restaurant operator or retailer.
advantages of franchising
Instant company recognition/preexisting branding/customers
Proven successful business model/Prior performance record, tested management program
Can be quickest way to become business owner
Successful franchisor can bargain for better deals on inputs and real estates due to financial strength and large volume of purchases→can also be passed down to franchisee
disadvantages of franchising
Initial franchise fees
Loyalty payments
Poor experience in one branch may deter customers from other branches
A bad franchisee can reflect badly on the franchisor
Lose control over every aspect of business, no flexibility
Corporation Management
Shareholders
owners of a corporation as a result of their purchase of shares in the corporation
elect board of directors
closely held corporation
owned by only a few shareholders and shares are unavailable to outsiders (ex: family businesses)
Open/publicly held corporation
sells shares to the general public, which sets up a diversified ownership.
Annual shareholders meetings
Broader range of operations
Outside Director
Part of Board of Directors (not an employee of corporation)
No direct role in daily operations
They don’t have to be a shareholder
Remain independent
Provide oversight, strategic direction, ensure accountability
Board of directors
the governing body of a corporation.
Sets overall policy,
authorizes the corporation’s major transactions
hires the chief executive officer (CEO)
Elected by shareholders
Approve strategic direction
Ensuring regulatory compliance
Top executive can also chair the board sometimes
Can include both inside and outside directors (shareholders but not employed by organization)
Corporate officers and managers
Executives:
Chief executive officer (CEO)
Chief operating officer (COO)
Chief financial officer (CFO)
Chief information officer (CIO)
Managers:
Middle management→ongoing operational functions, act as liason between top and bottom management
Supervisory personnel→day to day operations, task allocation, evaluate job performance
advatages of corporation
Separate legal entity
Shareholders not personally liable for debts of company
Limited financial risk
Only risk money they have invested in purchasing shares
Personal finances remain untouched
Extends legal lifespan
Continue to operate regardless of ownership changes
disadvantages of corporation
Double taxation
Taxed on profits at corporate level
Shareholders taxed again on dividends they receive
Lots of paperwork
required to file extensive paperwork
Loss of control
As it grows, shareholders can exert more influence
Slower decision-making
Can take longer to reach consensus as more people involved
Financial disclosure
Required to disclose their financial statements to public
More vulnerable to competitors
Takes time, resources
Equity as Debt
If they are redeemable, it's like having to pay the principle at the end
Company has obligation to buy back shares
Similar to repaying a loan
If they are cumulative, it's kind of like an obligation to pay annually→kind of like paying back principal interest
Unpaid dividends collect overtime
starbucks solutions
Lower prices
Positive: increase customer base by attracting more price-sensitive/lower income customers
Negative: Could dilute premium image of starbucks brand
Streamlining operations
Positive: Could decrease wait times/improve customer service efficiency
Negative: Could be costly + reduce employee morale by creating pressure to do more work with fewer resources
Alternative product offerings
Positive: Expanding beyond coffee could appeal to new customer segments, diversified product portfolio
Negative: Could dilute starbucks core identity as a premium coffee brand
pros of remote work
Cost savings - less need for office space can lead to significant savings
Environmental benefits, Reduced commuting, Office energy consumption
Lower environmental footprint
Wider Talent Pool
Broadens the hiring pool
Allow companies to recruit talent from diverse locations without geographic restrictions
Cons of remote work
Lack of social interaction - in person interaction can diminish the social aspect of the workplace
Leading to feelings of isolation
Decreased teamwork
Limited physical interaction = weaken team collaboration
Communication Gaps
Lack of spontaneous communication or informal networking can affect work dynamics
Out of sight out of mind
Remote workers might be overlooked for promotions or recognition due to reduced visibility
More distractions
Networking challenges
Medtronic (Dr Jha)
Having clear vision + strong ethical standards
Building strong ethical foundation and a highly motivated workforce
Mission: helping people and making a positive impact though their products
Wasn’t about revenues and profits but rather how quickly someone could be helped
Mastercard (Dr Jha)
Importance of planning, understanding the market
85% of global transactions are in cash, 15% was electronic
Vision→kill cash
Focused on converting the 85% into card-based transactions
Forward thinking aimed at long term growth
Shifted mastercard’s approach from immediate competition to future market expansion
Bestbuy (Dr. Jha)
Used strategic planning process
Differentiating itself by focusing on customer service
Increasing pay for employees
Providing better service
Improving customer satisfaction
While other companies might compete on price, Bestbuy could compete through service
Charged tech companies to place products in bestbuy stores
Created a brick and mortar presence for stores that didn’t’ want the cost and risk of building stores
Allowed brands to have a physical space whilst generating revenue
Shifted strategy to: offer value through services
Competitors like amazon couldn’t easily match
Includes: in-store advice, tech support, immediate access to products
Hubert Joly (former ceo) →win-win situation
Customer receives better service/immediate access to products
Vendors got exposure/presence without overhead costs
Best buy generated revenue from both customers and companies
JP Morgan Chase (Dr. Jha)
Decision making + meeting efficiency
No presentations (CEO Jamie Dimon)
Everyone required to do pre-reads and come prepared with recommendations
Ensures that meeting time is used efficiently to make decisions
Not go over details that could be prepared in advance
Focuses solely on decision making
preparations →more productive meetings→better decisions
Dr. Jha: Development bank of singapore (DBS)
Encouraging risk-taking
Piyush Gupta Former CEO of DBS fostered a culture of taking risks and making bold decisions
Ex. An employee made a decision that costed the bank a few million dollars, Gupta gave the individual an award
Mistake only existed because there was a fault in the company
Promotes independent thinking and a proactive approach to problem solving
Nvidia (Jensen Huang CEO of Nvidia, Dr. Jha)
Servant Leadership→how can I help you?
Leads with humility and focuses on needs of the organization than seeking personal acclaim
Highlights:
Selflessness
Commitment to broader mission of company
Cleveland Clinic (Dr Jha)
Once rated lowest patient care in the US
Solution:
Every staff member wore a badge saying “I am a caregiverˮ
Making clinicʼs objectives more about service rather than profit Improved services from top to bottom
West Jet (Dr Jha)
Corporate culture
People and culture
Importance of employees
Guest experience
Ensuring customer satisfaction through excellent service experience
Revenues and growth
Expanding business and generating consistent revenue streams
Adidas (Dr. Jha)
Instill belief that they're not just making shoes/apparel but about helping athletes achieve their dreams
Pivot corporate culture/mission/vision
Levis (Dr. Jha)
Vision: Environmental sustainability + long term customer loyalty
Reduce waste
Recycled clothing
“Blue Jeans go Greenˮ Program promotes recycling old denim into new products
Customers are rewarded for participating in recycling program
Fostering customer loyalty while promoting CSR
Bright, spacious, airy offices
Amenities like sport facilities and free food
Create engaging, positive atmosphere
Pros of Google
Attracts higher # of applications due to appealing work environment
Boost employee efficiency/productivity
Improves employee morale
Flexible to what you do (autonomy)
Cons of google
High costs in environmental maintenance
No guarantee that it will improve productivity
Risk of employee becoming distracted
Reduced professionalism
Intellectual property theft (open environment)
Ashley Maddison
Slogan: “Life is short, Have an affair”
Major data breach revealed their private information and harmed their relationships
Families destroyed, suicides
John gibson suicide (he was a pastor teaching religion)
Company→promised it was anonymous and trustworthy
Gibson→made an account on how own accord, made his own choices including suicide
Website made it a public shaming
Customers
Often deceived by fake profiles
Misled thinking they were engaging with real users
Paid for interactions with fake people
Employees
Some were involved in creating fake user profiles
Ethical dilemmas for workers even though they were paid for the work
Investors
Unethical investment
General public
Faced criticism for promoting infidelity
Platform normalizes unethical behavior affecting trust in relationships
ashley madison branding change
Life is short. Have an affair→find your moment
Does branding change make strategic sense?
Once a cheating website=always will be a cheating website
Doesn’t matter what they’re selling, its still ashley madison
Reverted back to original motto several months later
Bell- Lisa Laflamme (Case study)
Ethical dilemma surrounding the dismissal of Lisa Laflammae
Prominent news anchor replaced after letting her hair turn grey
Double Standard in Appearance
Men with grey hair = sophisticated
Women with grey hair are not viewed positively
Replaced by Omar Sachedina;
CityNews hired Lisa LaFlamme after dismissal
Pros: CityNews gains positive public opinion by hiring her after the controversy
Consumers
May be ethical given whether the consumers prefer a new anchor
Employees
Against: Firing her over hair color takes away her autonomy and freedom to look the way she chooses
For: Expectation for a certain ‘lookʼ in public roles like news anchor
Investors
Risk to profitability with accusations of unethical behavior
Potentially hurting the companyʼs image and stock
Public
Depending on different views
Some may view it as meeting consumer demand
Others may view it as promoting sexism and ageism
Wells Fargo (case study)
Unethical behavior driven by aggressive sales culture
Related to creation of fake accounts to meet unreasonable sales targets
Inflating # of accounts to make performance metrics look better
Employees pressured to meeting high sales
Resulting in creation of multiple accounts without consumer knowledge
Employees:
Pressured into unethical practices, leading to firings
Consumers:
Misled and exploited with unauthorized accounts
Investors/shareholders:
Companyʼs reputation damaged
Impacted stock price and long term profitability
Lack of accountability
Executives were not initially held accountable
Reflects poorly on companyʼs brand and leadership
Highlights:
Setting reasonable management goals
Maintaining ethical standards
EU Imports Chinese EVs
China grew from 1% to 15% of EU EV Market share
Free trade vs protectionism
Chinese EVs is supported/subsidized by its government→unfair competition
People in EU buying Chinese cars
EU wants to lower carbon footprint, so tariff may harm this goal
State capitalism vs market economies
State capitalism by china influences global markets
Balancing environmental and economic goals
Pros of state capitalism
Lower costs, faster growth
High market dominance
Easier to scale up
More stable in economic downturn
Economies of scale and competitive advantage
Lower costs→increases market efficiency
More efficient use of labor + lower cost labor
Larger = buy in bulk = cut costs/negotiate with suppliers→purchasing economies of scale
Standardized components across vehicles
Cons of state capitalism
Less entrepreneurship, inefficiencies
Overinvestment by local government
Lack of innovation because less competition
Less incentive to be innovative, cut costs etc because large funding from government
Market tensions among different countries
Trade retaliation
pros of tariffs (market economies policy)
Levels the playing field by reducing price gap between foreign and domestic companies
Protects local workers
Temporary relief to restructure
Encouraging domestic purchasing
cons of tariffs (market economies policy)
Less motivation for domestic companies to innovate because less competition
Inefficiency
Decreases cooperation between local and foreign companies
Trade tensions + trade retaliation
Dealing with tariffs
tariff alternatives
Moving production lines overseas
Joint ventures
Subcontracting
Licensing
Offshoring
Franchising
Staying innovative
Dumping?
Diversifying supply chain
Strategic importance of supply chain control
More control→ reduce costs increase efficiency
Control quality of goods being made
Responsiveness and agility → adapt to changes
vertical integration
Better control of supply chain, communication
Everything is in-house, better innovation
Ex: Tesla
Produces vehicle components in house and operates its own sales / service network
Outsourcing
Less control over subcontractors
Dependence on others
Reduce costs
Fix costs are incurred on the outsourcing company
Efficiency → others may be better at doing something
Product development
Reduce labor costs→outsource to country with lower labor costs
Decrease operational costs
Global supply chain dependencies
China's control of EV battery supply chain
Risks associated with overreliance on single country for critical component
Less bargaining power
Geopolitical issues
Supply chain risks
Fluctuations
Regulations
Strategies to mitigate overreliance:
Strengthen inventory management
Diversify supply chain
Collaborate regionally
Not put all eggs into one basket
business impacts
property damage, disruption of business, insurance claims
Companies will be more thoughtful about location of operations and how to manage related climate risk
rising c02 emissions
Principle factors
Rising populations
Growing energy use per capita
Use of technology
More money, consume more
Fastest growth in population and gdp per capita and energy use per capita in emerging/developing countries
who must respond
Individual→ municipal →provincial→federal→global
Governments and businesses have more responsibility (scale matters)
Important framework: shareholder capitalism (milton friedman) vs stakeholder capitalism
Shareholder capitalism (old model)
focus on shareholder value (maximizing profit)
Most companies that were historically operating under shareholder capitalism are switching towards stakeholder model
Deliver highest returns to its shareholders
Maximizing profit
Stakeholder capitalism (new model)
looks at all stakeholders
: if you want to be a successful corporation, you need to take care of all stakeholders (employees, customers, shareholders, suppliers, etc.)
Balancing profitability with social environmental
Care for stake holders
Employees
Shareholders
Customers
Suppliers
Communities
Planet
traditional model
Traditional model (Triple E): Company must have right environment, good economics, and be equitable in order to be sustainable
New model
New model has unequal priorities, working from outer circle inwards → environment is higher priority
Economy doesn’t matter if environment is not safe and stable
Economy doesn’t matter if there is social unrest
Economy is important but it is no longer the top priority
Environment sustainability is a top priority
Society = building long term trust and stability
Otherwise economy cannot thrive
options to respond
example: own a flagship hotel
1) minimize own negative impact (ESG)
use renewable source of power to minimize own impact→hotels use a lot of energy (water, electricity, etc)
Asks customers what they want to be washed
Saving money (financial)
Minimizes impact (environmental)
2) prepare for unavoidable consequences
change infrastructure to make it more stable, withstand climate emergencies
Insurance policy coverage review
Shift
nonprofit started in 2017
Vision: transforms potential of something discarded into something valuable
Real life example of addressing climate change
Created out of a business case competition
Vast energy potential of human waste
convert animal & human waste into clean energy for cooking fuel & lighting
impact of shift
individual level
free resources
clean cooking fuel and lighting at night
improved quality of life
community level
fertilizer from residual waste in energy domes
improved productivity from reliable energy access
global level
prevent climate change
reduce greenhouse gases
safer energy source
reduce energy insecurity
5 Vs of big data
Volume
Amount of data
Variety
Diversity of data
Velocity
Speed of data generation
Veracity
Accuracy of data
Value
Worth of data
CIA Triad
Foundational model in information security
Confidentiality
Integrity
Availability
security risks in data management
Leaks
Data getting into the wrong hands
Balancing accessibility and security
Role of CIO
Chief information officer
Growing prominence in recent years
Make sure IT strategy is in line with business strategy
Technology and information management
Technological infrastructure and hardware + software
Scalability
Budgeting and cost management
Ex: canadian immigration portal down 1 day after trump got elected
Costs: people have to wait, takes 3-4 years + 1 day
Costs in scaling up
Very low impacts
Benefits: portal works, people can apply
Need to consider impacts and risks before taking action
Team leadership, managing IT team, overseeing tasks
Compliance and cybersecurity
Communication with stakeholders
Ways to use big data
Predict demand
Good in higher demand during certain times
Point out gaps
Software pointed out certain products not displayed on shelves
Turnout analysis
Time taken from problem spotted to solution reduced form 3 weeks to 20 minutes
Instore vs online retail
Big data just as relevant to walmart as it is to amazon
Challenges of using big data
Capital intensive
Cost constraints
Too much data
How do we figure out which data is relevant
Recruitment
Hiring qualified resources
Training
Developing talent
Coca Cola and ESG
Every business has some sort of role of sustainability
How quickly can we get out of plastic, support recycling, reduce carbon, diesel to electric
Regulations could shut down the company
New trend of sustainability in business reports
Stakeholders
employees
Customers
Consumers
Don't want to have to hesitate when consuming the product because of sustainability impact
Shareholders
Shareholders need to know how quickly coca cola will fix these sustainability issues
Coca Cola Canada Bottling Limited (CCCBL)
5 years worth of rights to do bottling in canada
foriegn licensing agreement/franchise
Specialization in being efficient operator of bottling
Coca cola company is separate from coca cola canada
TCCC gets a royalty
CCBL is only able to sell bottles because of the demand/branding of TCCC
Two way relationship
Very similar to a franchise
Advantages for KO (the coca cola company)
Company can fully focus on marketing, no need to focus on operations and distributions
Less daily operational expenses
Able to maintain the same brand image throughout north america and globally across cultures
Focus on big picture brands, focus on global perspective
People are always traveling, so it helps to have a consistent brand that people can recognize whatever country they are in
Allows global company to be a local company
Good to have a partnership with a local company
Collecting royalties is a good way to insulate yourself from the market
Disadvantages for KO (the coca cola company)
Manufacturing challenge→reduced quality/inconsistency with parent company
Local company might not work for the global brand
Disagreement with local bottler, different interests
Franchisor asking franchisee to invest a lot of equipment to be able to produce new products in alignment with franchisor’s brand objectives
20 years ago KO bought all the local bottler companies
Reengineering them with new staff that was more aligned with the coca cola brand
Consumers may associate Issue with local bottler with the parent company
Global company’s profits is based on local bottler’s performance
Profit might be the biggest objective for local bottler
Global company might be more focused on long term goals/sales, demographics engaged, rather than today’s profits
Less control over production / safety
advantages for local bottlers
Able to operate locally
Profit off of coca cola’s brand image and marketing
Less spending on branding and marketing
Access to Supply networks from coca cola
disadvantages for local bottlers
Franchisor is always taking money→cut of gross revenues
Small company working with global behemoth
Total dependency/delicate partnership
Coca cola has majority of the negotiating power
If coca cola were to revoke the license, bottling company would have million in machinery with no purpose
Strong dependency on the global brand
If brand image is damaged in another country, it could affect local bottler
Less autonomy
Why invest in a bottler operation
E.g. Kilmer Group purchasing coca cola canada bottling limited
Basically a franchise
Growth in another sector
Diversify portfolio
Safely enter another industry because there is already a pre-existing brand/company backing the business
Tim McNerney M&A
Acquiring a business
The ILC skincare story
Formulation manufacturing packaging
Work with brands who have developed a new skincare product who wants to focus on the brand
Basically like a bottler but for skincare
ILC does the manufacturing for these brands
Finding and identifying potential acquisitions
Market research
Thoroughly analyze industry trends, competitor analysis, and customer pain points to uncover promising acquisition opportunities
Growth potential
Look for business with strong growth prospects, innovative products or services, and a loyal customer base
Synergies
Identify potential synergies that could create value such as complementary products, distribution channels, or cost savings
Find one that is in a space that is least likely to be disrupted
Offshoring
Innovation
Reviewing opportunity: evaluating ILC skincare
Financial analysis
Financial statements, profitability, revenue growth, cashflow
Market position
Asses ’s market share, brand reputation, competitive advantages to determine long term potential in market
Operational efficiency
Analyze operations, supply chain, infrastructure to identify potential areas for improvement and cost optimization
LOI
letter of intent (Buyer to seller)
Broad statements about how much you'd be willing to pay
Range of price
Your intentions as a buyer
Level of investment and activeness of buyer and seller
Presenting an offer: negotiating the agreement
Initial offer
Multiple bids
Agent coordinates offers against each other
Negotiating process
Exclusive negotiations
Completely open up their books to you for due diligence
Financial assessment and accounting skills becomes crucial
Constructive dialogue to reach mutually beneficial agreement
Address key terms and conditions
Final agreement
Securing capital and financing (funding the acquisition)
Equity financing
Leverage existing capital or seek investments from venture capitalists, angel investors, or strategic
Debt financing
Bank loans, asset based lending, private debt placements to fund acquisition, bonds
Debt service coverage
Amount of debt you have to service (annual payments compared to how much profit you you make) >1.25
Creative funding
Consider alternative financing solutions, such as crowdfunding, seller financing, or earnouts
Careful planning
Develop comprehensive financing strategy that balances risk, cost, and the long term sustainability of acquired business
Transitioning to new ownership (smoothing out the takeover)
Communication
Engage with stakeholders to ensure seamless transition
Cultural integration
Foster a positive cultural alignment by aligning values, goals, and operational practices between the acquirer and the
Strategic alignment
Clearly define strategic vision, synergies, and growth plans to effectively integrate the acquired business
Entering and optimizing the business (driving growth)
Set clear objectives
Measurable goals and key performance indicators to track success
Leverage synergies
Identify and capitalize on operational, financial, and strategic synergies to drive efficiency and profitability
Innovate and expand
Invest in product development, marketing and new market entry to fuel the growth of the acquired business
What do clients keep asking for which we have not offered as a service?
Sustainability
Increased orders, satisfy customers
Empower the team
Retain and motivate key talent to foster a collaborative culture supporting integration and growth objectives
Key takeaways on M&A
Thorough evaluation
Strategic alignment
Seamless integration
Continuous improvement
Understand own strengths and own work
Scalability
Location
Amazon
Key success factors
Large scale digital infrastructure
Customer-oriented approach →fast delivery etc
Anticipating customer needs/wants
Humans assisting robots rather than the other way around
Constantly measuring productivity
Cheetah and gazelle concept
Amazon = cheetah
Goes after Gazelles
lower end companies, third party sellers (weak gazelles)
Give them attractive terms and change them later
Squeeze them
Amazon strategic decisions
AWS = amazon web services
Generated revenue and profits for Amazon
CIA did a joint project with AWS→created trust and brand reputation
Amazon e-commerce (not AWS) was making a loss for 2 decades
Trying to keep prices competitive
Had to establish infrastructure to gain economies of scale
Data analytics and big data
collecting/gathering data on consumer behavior
Anticipate consumer preferences to suggest goods
Predicting behavior
Constantly monitoring employees and productivity rate
Amazon threats
Charged by EU in antitrust lawsuit (disadvantage)
Anticompetitive behavior (monopoly power)
Monopolistic Behavior
Is Amazon becoming too big?
Competitors: Temu, Alibaba
Not really close competitors - quality image (Low)
Certain things you buy at a dollar store
Breaking amazon down could harm consumers
Consumers would be upset if there wasnt amazon
amazon for startups
Advantages
Anyone can signup and sell goods on amazon
Gives new businesses exposure and access to more consumers
Disadvantages
Hard for businesses to compete with amazon’s infrastructure
Get squeezed/bullied by amazon because lower negotiating power
amazon finances
Highest operating income - AWS
International sector - loss
Should they continue with their international operations?
Best predictor of future is past
Used to make loss in america
Number supports this argument because they are losing less
Losses are decreasing→eventually turn profit?
Expenses may proportionately decrease as these international countries become more developed with better infrastructure
Underestimated competition in china - JD
WTO expecting more trade barriers going forward with Trump planning to impose tariffs
Revenue still getting bigger every year
Drop 2020 as an anomaly?
Supply chain issues
Fuel price issues →transportation costs
amazon ethics
Employees
Stipends (fixed regular sum)
Training
Harsh work conditions/stress because constant pressure to increase productivity
Consumers
Convenience
Good prices
Alexa - listening and gathering data without consumer’s knowledge
Vendor
Helps them expands
Harms them /squeeze them
General
Bring in money
Tax dollars
Crate income create wealth
Create jobs
Questionable practices
Strategic alliances with government, CIA
Police department - ring software
Privacy violations
ESG and carbon footprint
Investors
Bringing in money
Controversial
Anticompetitive behavior
Boycotts
sustainable competitive advantage
one that is difficult for competitors to imitate→valuable and rare
strategy
Foundations of strategic competitiveness
Competitive advantage
Internal analysis + external analysis = strategic management
internal analysis
Potential core competencies:
Special knowledge
Superior tech
Efficient manufacturing approaches
Unique product distribution systems
external analysis
Assessment of macro environment:
Tech
Government
Social structures and population demographic
Global economy
Natural environment
Analysis of industry environment:
Resource suppliers
Competitors
Customers
SWOT
Internal: strength and weakness
External: opportunities and threats
Tesla
s=self-driving commercial cars
w=production constraints, overinflated stock price
t=cheaper alternatives from competitors
o=people becoming more environmentally conscious
Growth strategies
concentration, diversification
Concentration
being everywhere, Tim Hortons
Diversification
vertical, related, and unrelated→Rogers owning X that offers a different product
Retrenchment
improve financial stability and longterm success
Restoring financial stability, Cutting excesses, Optimizing resources, Realigning business operations, and Salvaging profitable segments
correcting weaknesses, liquidation, restructuring (downsizing and rightsizing), restructuring through divestitures
strategy formation
Opportunities for achieving sustainable competitive advantage
Cost and quality
Knowledge and speed
Barriers to entry
Financial resources
Strategies vs tactics (long term vs short term)
Battlefield strategy
first , we will win the war in the east, then turn our forces westward
The big picture of how the war will be waged over the next months
Battlefield tactics
This morning, the gunners will fire volleys, then the footmen will charge their positions
Short term plans for today’s battle, that support the strategy
Tactics may change frequently, depending on movement to moment conditions, while strategies or the big picture typically won’t change very much very often
Eaton strategy formulation
Steps of strategy formulation
Identify
prior strategy was to be middle-high end (like the Bay)
Analyse
appeared like the environment was open for another higher end department store and they had the resources to convert stores to higher end stores
Revise
Changed strategy to being a high end retailer
Implement
Changed store appearance and marketing campaigns
Evaluate
Realized they already had a brand image in the eyes of the consumer - failed miserably and sold the company to Sears who then closed all the Eaton’s stores purchased
why eaton failed
Didn’t align with existing brand image
Rebranded to become a more higher end mall
Emergence of ecommerce
People want the whole value proposition (actual stall rather than small stands→experience matters)
Why would i go to eaton when we can go to Bay where its more established as a higher end mall