1/17
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Fundamental need to belong
all humans need a certain minimum quantity of regular, satisfying social interactions
Dewall & Baumeister (2006)
future alone is the most pain sensitivity
Maner et al. (2007)
willingness to join the most is when they were rejected
Attraction
proximity, similarity, reciprocity, physical attractiveness
Moreland & Beach (1992)
women are more attractive when they showed up to the most classes
Matching phenomenon
we chose partners who are good match for us in their attractiveness
What is beautiful is good
assume attractive people have other good traits
Symmetry
people with more symmetrical faces are perceived to be more physically attractive
Averageness
people with familiar looking faces are perceived as more physically attractive
Women’s attractiveness
neonate facial features (baby faced features)
waist-to-hip ratio .70 ideal
Men’s attractiveness
masculinity, square jaws, prominent chin, heavier eyebrows, shoulder-to-hip ratio, V-shaped body, height (most important to women)
Li et al. (2002)
designing your ideal mate with 20 dollars
men spent the most on attractiveness and women spent the most on intelligence and income
Provost et al. (2008)
women are attracted to more masculine walks when ovulating
Miller & Maner (2008)
men’s testosterone was the highest when they smelt the woman’s shirt who was ovulating
Clark & Hatfield (1989)
men were likely to engage in casual sex than women
Kendrick et al. (1990)
men’s standards are relaxed when it comes to casual sex
Gender differences
differ in standards for short-term partners similar for long term partners because of cultural norms
error management theory
not all errors are created equal, we want to make the least costly error
men overestimate sexual interest
women underestimate commitment