1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Explain Aristotle's doctrine of the mean. Provide examples to illustrate how moral virtues represent the mean between vices of deficiency and excess.
The mean: true virtue lies in the middle between 2 extreme states of excess and deficiency
virtues ruined by excess/deficiency but preserved by the mean
virtue = disposition to behave in the right manner and as a mean
Pleasure and Pain:
The mean is a state of clarification/apprehension in the midst of pleasure and pains that allows one to judge what’s most truly pleasant or painful
appropriate attitude towards these is most important habit to develop for moral virtue
someone’s pleasure or pain following an action gives an indication of state
EXAMPLES:
courage = mean between cowardice and rashness
honesty = mean between truthfulness and bluntness
preceding feelings: if a person is grieved by obstaining from indulgence, he is overindulgent
3 Rules:
Avoid extremes from the mean
Avoid the errors we’re susceptible to (notice them too)
Avoid pleasure, it impedes judgment
How does Aristotle argue that moral virtues are acquired through habituation and practice? Why is this process important for ethical development?
Moral virtue is learned by habit and constant practice
everyone born with potential, but only can train to become morally virtuous through behaving in the right way (like a musician learning an instrument)
NO ABSOLUTE RULES — mean is subjective
also requires choice and affirmation
By moral virtues, we act by:
Passions (what the soul undergoes to drive action)
Capacities (the cap of the abilities of the soul)
Characteristics (developed by habit)
Habit:
a routine, action, something you do without thinking about it (second nature)
the more you subject yourself to repeated actions —> less resistance
soul starts taking on new characteristics
what starts as pain becomes pleasure
What are the key traits of a magnanimous person? What are the key traits of a “small souled” person? In what sense do you think a person could be said to be a “megalomaniac”? (Nic. Eth. Book IV)
Maganimous person:
deems himself worthy of great things and is worthy of them
fitting estimation of himself without arrogance or pride — extreme in terms of greatness but in the middle of how he views himself
accepts honor and doesn’t shy from responsibility
confident in himself
Small souled person:
opposite character of the great man on the side of deficiency
deprives himself of good things he deserves
their view of themselves makes them appear worse than they are
outsiders will also think that he is not worthy of great things
Megalomaniac:
foolish egoist who has delusions of grandeur and obsession with power
takes on honorable responsibilities he’s not worthy of
thinks of himself more than what he is worth
boasts about his greatness to others
15. You should be able to outline and discuss the specific traits that pertain to the virtues of
(Nic. Eth. Book IV):
Magnanimity
Ambition
Gentleness
Being pleasant
Not being boastful
Magnanimity — the mean of perceived greatness
greatness of soul, a balance of how you view yourself and what you deserve
accepting rightful honor and responsibility
generosity
Ambition — the mean of seeking honor
2 sides, good and bad: (1) more fondness of honor than most VS (2) seeking more honor than is right
it’s possible to seek honor both more and less than is right, and also possible to do so rightly
however, the middle character has no name
Gentleness — the mean of anger
a calm temper; inclined to forgive, not seek revenge
the observance of mean in relation to anger — gentle-tempered man feels anger on the right grounds, against right person, in the right manner, moment, and length of time
Excess: lack of spirit and doesn’t get angry at all VS gets violently angry
Pleasantness — the mean of social interaction
behaves in the right manner in society, guided by considerations of honor and concerned w pleasure/pain in social interactions
knows what interactions to accept or refuse based on pleasure and pain
prefers to join in the pleasures of his companions, but willing to give small pain for the sake of large pleasure in the future
Boastfulness — the mean of humility
person who is truthful and acknowledges qualities he possess without exaggeration or diminishment
humble and modest
recognizes accomplishments without having to seek validation
Excess: boasting about unpossessed qualities VS falsely denying qualities possessed
3. Compare and contrast Aristotle's virtue ethics with other ethical theories, such as deontology and consequentialism. What are the strengths and limitations of each approach?
Deontology — Objective
individuals should act based on what they believe to be morally right regardless of consequences
categorical imperative: moral obligation binding in all circumstances regardless of person’s own desires and the consequences
univeralise everything — if you engage in this, if everyone did it would it end good? (wife problem, COVID problem)
Aristotle virtue ethics — Subjective
one’s character should be aimed at what is good and just, which is subjective to what is recognized to be the right way to behave
based on person’s own ability to reason rather than rulebook for deciding course of action
Example: lying
Deontology: everyone shouldn’t lie, regardless of outcome
Virtue ethics: must determine whether the lie is a good or bad thing: how does it sit with them internally, how will it affect the other person, how it might change people’s perceptions of them
What are the characteristics of a timocratic man and how does he come about?
Timocratic Man
Degrades from Aristocrats — everyone born into the rightful position
due to wrong birth, a Timocratic man is formed
Ruled by Spirited — rules with honor, courage valor
values: war and patriotic sacrifice > wisdom, strong and simple > wise
No stable reason and lacks intellect
Love for victory turns to ambition for money
Lesson:
Spirited is strong-willed and accomplished, but quickly led away by greed and starts using energy for unjust causes
the soul needs reason to guide virtues and ethics
5. What are the characteristics of an oligarchic man and how does he come about?
Oligarchic Man:
developed from the love of money from a timocracy
Driven by Appetitive spirit
Values: wealth and money > virtue —> unqualified people become rulers
city can’t fight in a war because rulers are afraid of arming their people
City with 2 faces: chasm between poor and rich constantly plotting against each other
Lesson:
danger of letting desires consume us: appetite for wealth can never be satisfied
the wealthy man only ruled by appetite and greed develops an impoverished and stingy soul — man of 2 faces, rich and poor, is developed
Comment and elaborate on Socrates’ claim: “the greatest and most savage slavery [comes] out of the extreme of freedom” (The Republic, 564a).
Democracy:
comes from the insatiable desire to make more money, leading to few rich and many poor
poor revolt, getting rid of the rich and making a new constitution where everyone is equal in ruling the city
State: too much freedom, no harmony, no control, unnecessary desires
everyone pursuing their own desires, leading to people in places where they don’t belong
Lesson: a city (or soul) should not focus on individual happiness of one class but the happiness of the whole
if everyone is pursuing individual happiness, city becomes unjust
Pay attention to how Socrates defines the virtues (wisdom, courage, moderation, and justice). What are each of these virtues and where are they to be found in the city? (The Republic, Bk IV, 419a-445e)
Wisdom — Ruling class
Wisdom is found with the guardians, who are the rulers and can make decisions about the city as a whole
Knowledge is judgment and good decisions
Courage – warrior class
Found with the warriors, who serve the city’s army
Courage is a power and preservation – the preservation of keeping courage in all situations through pains, pleasures, desires, and fears
Moderation – common citizens
Moderation is self discipline, a mastery of pleasures and desires
When a person is a master of himself – when the naturally better part of him is in control of the worse
Moderation is the city’s unanimity in following just city structure in terms of who should rule and who should be ruled
Justice – each class
When each class performs its proper function
What moral values does Socrates identify as characteristic of the democratic city? (The Republic, see esp. 560c-561a)
Vices now are Virtues in a democratic state:
LIPS
License as liberty — liberty without limits; no inspect for moral code, leading to weakening of moral standards
Insolence as good upbringing — being rude and ignorant is shown that you were raised right
Prodigality — the excess of spending; but this is portrayed as greatness and genorosity
Shamelessness — manly spirited and courageous; not conforming to society
What makes the ideal city wise? (The Republic, 428a11-429a2; esp. 428e6- 429a2)
The wisdom of a city founded on natural principles depends on its smallest group and element – the leading and ruling element – and the knowledge that element possesses
The class which can expected to share in this branch of knowledge is the smallest class, the ruling class
they can make good judgment and decisions
What makes the ideal city courageous? (The Republic, 429b8-430c1)
What is it for a city to be courageous?
Courage is a power and preservation – the preservation of keeping courage in all situations through pains, pleasures, desires, and fears
auxiliaries to be steadfast in their convictions, preserving, in the face of temptations
have the right beliefs about what should and should not be feared.
Because courage has to do with preserving beliefs “inculcated by the law through education,” it is dependent upon the rulers and their wisdom
Analyze Plotinus' perspective on the role of philosophy in Enneads Book I.2. How does philosophy guide the soul towards virtue and spiritual awakening?
Philosophy = path to virtue
virtue = aligning oneself with ultimate truth and goodness, which is the One
philosophy guides individual towards understanding of the One, the intellect, and the soul
Purification:
soul is divine but has become entangled in material world
through philosophy, individuals can purify intellect and free themselves from material realm
essential for soul’s ascent towards the One
Union with the One
the ultimate goal of philosophy = facilitate union with the One
union represents spiritual awakening and liberation from material world
philosophy guides individuals towards realization of true nature derived from the One
How does Plotinus conceive of the difference between the intellect (nous) and the soul (Enneads, Book I.1)?
3 Hypotheses of reality: the One, the Intellect, the Soul
Neo-Platonist — derives a lot of ideas of the Forms from Plato, but believes that the greatest reality to be the One
Intellect (nous) — a divisible reality of being and perception
similar to Plato’s realm of Ideas
highest aspect of the human soul — embraces all being and thought
Comes from the One, made in the One’s perfect image
can only understand its own image by contemplating the One
the One = the Creator God who is unchangeable and indivisible reality
can contemplate the One through cognitive unity — power to think, reason, understand reality
The Soul — link between Intellect and the sensory world
creation of intellect — the intellect’s image
dynamic principle that animates the body
composed of 2 parts: higher faculties (unchangeable and divine reasoning) and lower faculties (emotions, passions, desires)
associated with realm of becoming and change — undergoes experiences and transformations
strives to transcend material limitations and return to divine source, the One
Idea of “emanation” — expresses relationship between source and product
Intellect emanates from the external overflow from the One
Soul emanates from the external overflow of the intellect
What makes the ideal city moderate? (The Republic, 430e3-432a6)
Self-discipline extends throughout the whole city
Moderation is the city’s agreement in following just city structure in terms of who should rule and who should be ruled
natural harmony of worse and better classes