1/69
left off on issues pertaining to the parties to a contract
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
contract
enforcable agreement between 2 or more parties
can be
2 corporations
2 partnerships
2 individuals
bilateral contracts
2 or more parties
elements of contract formation
[offer + acceptance] + consideration = contract (K)
a contract must be for any lawful purpose - otherwise, contract is void
elements of agreement
offer + acceptance
consideration (element of contract)
the purpose of that offer + acceptance
money, goods, services
the subject matter
void
there is no contract if the 3rd element (consideration) is not present
binding
forceable, no excuses
contracts are either ___ or ___
expressed or implied
NEVER BOTH
types of contracts
express
implied
valid - void - voidable
executed vs. executory
quasi contracts
express
a contract stated either verbally or in writing (the parties have expressed their intent verbally or in writitng)
implied
conduct of parties
implied by their conduct - NOT implied verbally or in writing
valid
no one can get out of it
perfectly lawful, enforceable
all elements are there
it’s binding
void
illegal
involved a crime
subject matter is illegal
the offer & acceptance component (the agreement) is illegal
voidable
for some reason one or both of the parties can get out of it
there is something wrong with one or more of the people (intoxication, infancy, incapacity)
every contracts begins ___ and ends ___
executory, executed
executed
ended
nothing left to be done
completed
executory
any contract that there is something left to be done
ex: hasn’t given the cars and keys back yet
quasi contract
implied by law
there is no contract but the judges create one anyway
judge creates a contract to prevent an unfair result and the judge imposes orders
don’t confused quasi contract with implied contract!!
legality
all contracts must be for a lawful purpose
privity
the contract relationship between parties
means they are tied together “marriage”
when the contract is done, the privity is gone
“they are in privity” means
they are in a contract
parties to a contract
offeror vs. offeree
promisor vs, promisee
privity of contract
offeror
the person making the offer
offeree
to whom the offer is directed
a contract is
expressed OR implied
executed OR executory
valid OR void OR voidable
offer
the PRESENT intent to enter into a contract
you demonstrate your intent to enter into a contract either
verbally
written
by your conduct
what is NOT an offer?
an expression of opinion
ex: “i think your house is worth…” - NOT an offer
negotiation
advertisements
you demonstrate your intent to enter into a contract either
verbally
written
by your conduct
the difference between negotiation and a counter offer
the INTENT to enter a contract
silence
not considered acceptance
an offer comes to an end:
when the person making the offer cancels it (the offeror) anytime prior to acceptance (REVOCATION)
if the offeree rejects the offer (termination by action of the offeree (aka NO))
the offeror can terminate the offer before the agreement anytime they want to
offers…
expire
have a time limit on when the offeree can accept an offer
intoxication, insanity, infancy
expiration of offer - paid-for-opition
option contract pg. 241
paid-for-option
the contract to buy time, not the item
termination of offer
lapse of time (offer made on june 1, on june 2 it automatically expires
if person dies, the offer dies with them if they die before the offer was accepted
if a person dies when there is already a contract, then your family is responsible for carrying out that contract
how an offer ends
an offer can be terminated/cancelled anytime prior to acceptance; aka you can change your mind but only before acceptance because once they accept, you have an agreement
acceptance
unconditional agreement to terms of offer
YES - NO(rejection)
counter-offer
silence
IS NOT ACCEPTANCE
counter-offer
no & new offer
maybe
the offer was rejected with a counter offer
there is __ counteroffer after the time limit
NO
you cannot use a counteroffer to revive an offer, the offer is DEAD
consideration
purpose for the contract
must have something exchanged between the parties
usually money, goods, and/or services (like an employment contract)
ex: trading cars (it can involve money, doesn’t have to)
what causes there to be no contract?
if the element of consideration is not present
if the subject matter is illegal, there is no contract, it is void
illegal consideration
past consideration
pre-existing consideration
(NOT CONSIDERATIONS → takes out the “c” part of a contract → there is no contract)
usury
illegal, no consideration
loan sharking
loaning money with excessive illegal interest rate (ex: 50% a day)
exception (substitute) for consideration
charities
promissory estoppel (detrimental reliance)
promissory estoppel
moral obligation, not legal
contract capacity
ability to form proper INTENT to enter into a contract (in order to have it binding to all parties)
understand that a contract is being made and what it’s about
infancy (minors), intoxication, insanity
contract capacity at the time of entering a contract
infancy (minors)
minors can enter into contracts
minors can get out of contracts anytime before reaching the age of majority (maturity/adulthood)
once they turn 18 (or reach the age of maturity), it affirms the contract
the law presumes that minors can not understand the consequences of entering a contract
intoxication
if you are intoxicated to a certain extent, the contract is voidable
if you sober up the next day and still agree to the contract, the contract is affirmed
at the time of entering a contract you…
have to know its being made
have to know what it’s about (don’t have to understand all the fine print)
if you don’t understand those 2 points, it is voidable, you can get out of it
if the subject matter of the contract is illegal, there is no legal consideration & the contract is voidable
dissafermence
cancelling
simply not understanding a contract
can not get you out of it
you should have someone explain it to you
statute of frauds
general rule of contract law - oral and written contracts are equally enforcable - “legal”
certain types of contracts, must be in writing
real estate (land)
contracts with term longer than 1 year
issues pertaining to the parties to a contract
mistake
fraud
undue influence
duress
statute of frauds
contracts wether verbal or in writing are equally valid
it has to be in writing in order to be enforcable (in order to go to court)
what is voidable
mistake
something wrong with their head
contract remedies for breach of contract: damages, specific performance, injunction, rescission, no punitive damages permitted
constitutional issues
mitigation of damages
liquidated damages
impossibility
remedies
something went wrong, what do you want?
recission
end contract
non monetary
injuction
stop it
court-ordered
restitution
give stuff back
compensatory damages
compensation
money
liquidated damages
if something goes wrong, “i’m only responsible for this, you’re only responsible for that”
punitive damages
punish the wrongdoer
not allowed in contract law
keyman insurance
each partner ensures each other