1/33
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Summarise in 3 words - Pavlov (1902)
Classical conditioning discovered
How does it support classical conditioning? - Pavlov (1902)
Dogs learned to salivate to a bell after repeated pairing with food, showing classical conditioning.
Summarise in 3 words - Watson & Rayner (1920)
Conditioned fear response
How does it support classical conditioning? - Watson & Rayner (1920)
Fear (CR) was conditioned in Little Albert by pairing a neutral stimulus (rat) with a loud noise (UCS).
G - Generalisability - Watson & Rayner (1920)
Only one baby; can't generalise to others.
R - Reliability - Watson & Rayner (1920)
Controlled procedure and timings were recorded, supporting replicability.
A - Application - Watson & Rayner (1920)
Led to development of therapies for phobias.
V - Validity - Watson & Rayner (1920)
Controlled (internal validity high); artificial setting reduced ecological validity.
E - Ethics - Watson & Rayner (1920)
No consent, caused harm, no debrief/desensitisation.
Summarise in 3 words - Capafóns et al. (1998)
Testing fear reduction
How does it support classical conditioning? - Capafóns et al. (1998)
Fear of flying was reduced using counterconditioning (systematic desensitisation).
G - Generalisability - Capafóns et al. (1998)
Volunteer sample; may not generalise to wider population.
R - Reliability - Capafóns et al. (1998)
Used a consistent treatment protocol.
A - Application - Capafóns et al. (1998)
Can be applied to treat other phobias.
V - Validity - Capafóns et al. (1998)
Used self-reports and physiological measures; artificial setting may affect generalisability.
E - Ethics - Capafóns et al. (1998)
Exposure may have caused temporary stress but was therapeutic.
What did Skinner study? - Skinner (1948)
Operant conditioning with rats and pigeons using rewards/punishments.
How does it support operant conditioning? - Skinner (1948)
Behaviours increased when reinforced (e.g., lever press for food).
Strengths - Skinner (1948)
Controlled lab setting; clear cause and effect; supports therapies.
Weaknesses - Skinner (1948)
Used animals; may not generalise to humans; lacks ecological validity.
What did Köhler study? - Köhler (1942)
Chimpanzees solving problems with insight.
How does it challenge operant conditioning? - Köhler (1942)
Shows animals can learn via insight, not just trial and error.
Importance - Köhler (1942)
Highlights cognitive processes in learning; opposes purely behavioural view.
Key components of SLT - Bandura et al. (1961)
Observation, imitation, vicarious reinforcement, mediational processes.
Summary in 3 words - Bandura et al. (1961)
Aggression through imitation
How does it support SLT? - Bandura et al. (1961)
Children imitated aggressive role models more, especially same-sex models.
Strengths - Bandura et al. (1961)
Explains social behaviours; backed by lab evidence; includes cognitive factors.
Weaknesses - Bandura et al. (1961)
Lab setting; ignores biology (e.g., testosterone); hard to measure cognition.
G - Generalisability - Bastian et al. (2011)
The study used only university students, limiting generalisability to other age groups, cultures, and non-students.
R - Reliability - Bastian et al. (2011)
The use of standardised procedures, such as consistent game duration and tasks, supports high reliability and replicability.
A - Application - Bastian et al. (2011)
Findings can be used to understand the psychological impact of violent video games, particularly their effect on empathy and self-perception.
V - Validity - Bastian et al. (2011)
The artificial lab environment and reliance on self-report measures may reduce ecological and internal validity.
E - Ethics - Bastian et al. (2011)
Participants may have experienced psychological effects; ethical concerns include informed consent, debriefing, and protection from harm.