perception as a source of knowledge

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/15

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

16 Terms

1
New cards

direct realism (5 m)

  • immediate objects of perception = mind-independent objects and their properties

  • two elements - perceiver and object perceived

  • no mediator - perceived immediately and directly

  • senses detect properties (e.g. colour, shape) - inherent in objects themselves

  • object and properties continue to exist when unperceived

2
New cards

sense data (3 m)

  • content of perceptual experience

  • private - exists in mind of an individual

  • caused by/represents mind-independent objects

3
New cards

argument from perceptual variation (5 m)

  • appearance of physical objects varies depending on conditions

  • russell (problems of philosophy) - table appears white where light reflects but brown otherwise - apparent shape changes when viewed from different angles

  • possible for our perception to vary without changes to properties of the object itself

  • apparent properties are not the same as real properties - so dr is false

  • immediate objects = sense data - used to infer existence of objects

4
New cards

dr response to perceptual variation (5 m)

  • relational properties - vary in relation to something else

  • e.g. being to the left or right of something is a real property - but is dependent on position of the objects and of the perceiver

  • russell’s table - has the property of appearing kite-shaped relative to certain perceivers

  • rps belong to the object and are directly and immediately perceived - even though they can change

  • therefore not necessary to introduce sense data as a mediator - objects are still directly perceived

5
New cards

argument from illusion (5 m)

  • objects can appear to have particular properties that they do not - e.g. a straight straw appears bent when placed in glass of water

  • perceiver is directly aware of this apparent property - a bent-looking straw

  • object does not have this property in reality - real straw is not bent

  • what the perceiver is directly aware of (bent straw) and what is real (straight straw) are distinct

  • therefore we do not perceive objects directly - so dr is false

6
New cards

dr response to illusion (5 m)

  • i am not directly aware of anything distinct from the physical object - appearance of the straw is not a thing in itself

  • i am directly aware of the real straw - but it appears bent because of the circumstances (light travelling through two different mediums)

  • i am directly and accurately perceiving the refraction of light as it travels through the glass of water

  • drs do not have to assume that objects appear exactly as they are

  • can appear differently because of how they relate to the perceiver - not necessary to introduce sense data as mediator

7
New cards

argument from hallucination (5 m)

  • hallucination = i perceive something that exists only in my mind - mind-dependent sense data

  • can be subjectively indistinguishable from veridical perceptions

  • if this is the case i must be aware of the same thing in both cases

  • so what i am directly aware of during veridical perception must also be in the mind - sense data/ideas

  • therefore we perceive the world indirectly - so dr is false

8
New cards

response to hallucination (5 m)

  • hallucinations and veridical perception being subjectively indistinguishable does not mean they are the same phenomenon in reality

  • vp caused by physical object impacting on sense organs

  • hallucinations caused by some malfunction in the brain

  • they can be indistinguishable to the perceiver - still distinct phenomena

  • hallucinations occur in mind - does not follow that vp involves a purely mental element (sense data)

9
New cards

time-lag argument (5 m)

  • russell (problems of philosophy) - light from sun takes 8 mins to travel to earth

  • not seeing the sun as it is now but as it was 8 mins ago - could have ceased to exist in last 8 mins but would not know yet

  • if what you are perceiving may no longer exist, you cannot be perceiving it directly - must be sense data caused by sun’s light impacting on sense organs

  • true of distant objects - also true of close objects - time-lag is just far shorter

  • we are directly aware of appearances/sense data and not objects themselves - so dr is false

10
New cards
11
New cards
12
New cards
13
New cards
14
New cards
15
New cards
16
New cards