1/15
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
direct realism (5 m)
immediate objects of perception = mind-independent objects and their properties
two elements - perceiver and object perceived
no mediator - perceived immediately and directly
senses detect properties (e.g. colour, shape) - inherent in objects themselves
object and properties continue to exist when unperceived
sense data (3 m)
content of perceptual experience
private - exists in mind of an individual
caused by/represents mind-independent objects
argument from perceptual variation (5 m)
appearance of physical objects varies depending on conditions
russell (problems of philosophy) - table appears white where light reflects but brown otherwise - apparent shape changes when viewed from different angles
possible for our perception to vary without changes to properties of the object itself
apparent properties are not the same as real properties - so dr is false
immediate objects = sense data - used to infer existence of objects
dr response to perceptual variation (5 m)
relational properties - vary in relation to something else
e.g. being to the left or right of something is a real property - but is dependent on position of the objects and of the perceiver
russell’s table - has the property of appearing kite-shaped relative to certain perceivers
rps belong to the object and are directly and immediately perceived - even though they can change
therefore not necessary to introduce sense data as a mediator - objects are still directly perceived
argument from illusion (5 m)
objects can appear to have particular properties that they do not - e.g. a straight straw appears bent when placed in glass of water
perceiver is directly aware of this apparent property - a bent-looking straw
object does not have this property in reality - real straw is not bent
what the perceiver is directly aware of (bent straw) and what is real (straight straw) are distinct
therefore we do not perceive objects directly - so dr is false
dr response to illusion (5 m)
i am not directly aware of anything distinct from the physical object - appearance of the straw is not a thing in itself
i am directly aware of the real straw - but it appears bent because of the circumstances (light travelling through two different mediums)
i am directly and accurately perceiving the refraction of light as it travels through the glass of water
drs do not have to assume that objects appear exactly as they are
can appear differently because of how they relate to the perceiver - not necessary to introduce sense data as mediator
argument from hallucination (5 m)
hallucination = i perceive something that exists only in my mind - mind-dependent sense data
can be subjectively indistinguishable from veridical perceptions
if this is the case i must be aware of the same thing in both cases
so what i am directly aware of during veridical perception must also be in the mind - sense data/ideas
therefore we perceive the world indirectly - so dr is false
response to hallucination (5 m)
hallucinations and veridical perception being subjectively indistinguishable does not mean they are the same phenomenon in reality
vp caused by physical object impacting on sense organs
hallucinations caused by some malfunction in the brain
they can be indistinguishable to the perceiver - still distinct phenomena
hallucinations occur in mind - does not follow that vp involves a purely mental element (sense data)
time-lag argument (5 m)
russell (problems of philosophy) - light from sun takes 8 mins to travel to earth
not seeing the sun as it is now but as it was 8 mins ago - could have ceased to exist in last 8 mins but would not know yet
if what you are perceiving may no longer exist, you cannot be perceiving it directly - must be sense data caused by sun’s light impacting on sense organs
true of distant objects - also true of close objects - time-lag is just far shorter
we are directly aware of appearances/sense data and not objects themselves - so dr is false