1/30
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Controlled Substances Act of 1970: Drug Schedule
schedule one
drugs have high potential for abuse, have no medically accepted use, + lack safety information regarding their use
schedule two
drugs have high potential for abuse, have accepted medical uses, but their use may lead to severe dependence
schedule three
drugs have potential for abuse, have accepted medical uses, + may lead to low or moderate dependence
schedule four
drugs have low potential for abuse, have accepted medical uses, + have lower risk of dependence than do schedule 3 drugs
schedule five
drugs have low potential for abuse, have accepted medical uses, + have lower risk of dependence than do schedule 4 drugs
examples of drugs from each schedule
schedule one mmphl
heroin, LSD, mescaline, psilocybin, marijuana
schedule two
morphine, codeine, cocaine, amphetamine, methamphetamine, nabilone (synthetic THC)
schedule three
anabolic steroids, pentobarbital, Marinol (synthetic THC)
schedule four
benzodiazepines, phenobarbital, Ambien + similar sleep aids
schedule five
codeine + opiate preparations for cough or diarrhea
pharmacology of cocaine
rate of absorption depends on administration route
fast metabolism
1-1.5 hours
metabolites can be detected in blood/tissues for several weeks
crack cocaine
dissolve cocaine in ammonia or heat w/ baking soda so that it can be vaporized (inhalation)
*makes cracking sound + results in cocaine rocks
Cocaethylene
cocaine combined w/ alcohol; more potent w/ longer half-life (2.5 hrs); very cardiotoxic »» hypertension, arrhythmia, decreased blood flow
Cocaine mechanisms
slide one
binds to dopamine transporter (DAT) + blocks reuptake of DA
at least 47% of DATs must be blocked to perceive euphoric effects
typically 60-80% occupied
slide two
cocaine also blocks reuptake NE and 5HT reuptake which may contribute to reinforcing + euphoric effects
knockout mice (DAT gene deleted) tested to see if DA is primarily responsible
PPC place preference conditioning
dual-chamber apparatus in which mice can explore side w/ cocaine access + side w/o cocaine access
is blocking DAT sufficient (for whattttt - preventing cocaine overdose)?
no, methylphenidate also blocks DAT
speed of administration is a factor
methylphenidate - oral form typically much slower to enter brain + block DATs
DAT knockout mice
still prefer cocaine side
cocaine maintains reinforcing effects in absence of DAT blockade (which would normally provide the increased synaptic DA)
theory: 5-HT “upstream” in VTA »» contributes to increased DA release in NAC
cocaine: local anesthetic
dulls pain
constricts blood flow
mechanism
disrupts propagation of AP by blocking voltage-dependent NA channels
psychostimulants
amphetamine
methamphetamine
*Ephedrine - aka “ma huang” in Chinese medicine
amphetamine
1st synthesized in 1887
used widely by US military in both world wars
many deaths due to cardiotoxicity
examples
Benzedrine - mid 1930s, antihistamine inhalant
Dexedrine - soon after, for narcolepsy, attention disorders, nasal congestion, obesity
methamphetamine
synthesized from ephedrine in 1983 - aka “crystal meth” (crystal form)
1980s boom in popularity
high lipid solubility »» powerful euphoric effects
typically preferred over amphetamine
pharmacology of amphetamines
half-life = 10-15 hrs
peak plasma levels
PO (oral) = 2-3 hrs
inhalation (snorting/insufflation) or smoking = within 3-5 min
IV = seconds to minutes
excreted by kidneys
amphetamine mechanisms of action
increased release of NE + DA from presynaptic vesicles »» more DA + NE in synaptic cleft
DA released into presynaptic cytoplasm (becoming “free”)
dopamine transporter (DAT) acts in reverse
more DA in synaptic cleft
blocking reuptake transporter for NE »» more NE in synaptic cleft
amphetamine mechanisms of action continued
Da up-regulation in mesolimbic and mesocortical systems »» euphoria + cortical arousal
DA activity increased in nigrostriatal system »» motor stimulating effects
at high doses amphetamines induce psychosis
DA + NE activity increased in RAS »» increased cortical arousal, vigilance, + attention
expression of CART (cocaine & amphetamine-regulated transcript) in hypothalamus »» anorectic (appetite suppression) effects (wt loss)
other amphetamines -Ecstasy aka Molly
methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)
gained popularity in 1970s w psychotherapy + early 200s w/ heavy recreational use
effects: euphoria, increased self-perception, enhanced sensations, “promotes intimacy”
side effects: elevated HR/BP, bruxism (w/ broken teeth), neurotoxicity, esp reduced attention, concentration, memory
mostly 5HT agonist; but DA linked w/ euphoria
Psychedelics: LSD
most potent of all psychoactive drugs, discovered by Abbie Hoffman, synthesized in a labratory
psychedelics: Psilocybin
similar to LSD but from mushrooms in Pacific Northwest
common response to psychedelics
vivid visual hallucinations w/ color + movement elaboration
uncommon response to LSD + Psilocybin
synesthesia
flashbacks (“bad trip”) - unpleasant hallucinations that recur - likely from the memory + not residual drug effects
LSD and Psilocybin effects + actions
effects of both
increased HR/BP, pupil dilation, dizziness, increased temp
actions of both
primarily partial 5HT agonists; secondarily DA agonists
Marijuana (MJ)(Cannabinoids) history
was used pharmacologically in US mid-1800s for psychoactive effects + medicinally
Marijuana Tax Act (1937)
used prohibitive taxes to decrease cannabis use + research
Controlled Substances Act (1970)
listed it as Schedule 1 drug, an illicit substance
recently legalized in many states
marijuana pharmacokinetics (and administration route info)
active compound: tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)
concentration of THC varies widely
fast metabolism w/ typical effects lasting approx 2 hrs
administration rate
smoking is most effective administration route
reaches brain within seconds of inhalation
peak plasma levels reached within a few minutes
oral administration takes longer to absorb
use detection
single use detected for app 2 weeks
regular use detected for approx 4 weeks
marijuana pharmacodynamics
cannibinoid receptors located in basal ganglia, cerebellum, hippocampus, amygdala, thalamus, + cortex along w/ lymphatic tissues in immune system
effects: both inhibitory + excitatory
inhibitory effects on ACh + glutamate in hippocampus
disinhibitory effects on glutamate + DA in PFC
disinhibitory effects on DA in VTA
medical marijuana (PANG)
nausea/vomiting for cancer treatment (inhibit vomiting by acting on receptors in area postrema of brainstem)\
appetite loss in AIDS patients
pain (chronic)
increased intraocular pressure (glaucoma) are also treated
*pts report oral is not as effective as smoking marijuana + more difficult to regulate levels in general
psychoactive effects: marijuana
mild euphoria, distortions in time, sedation, can cause anxiety/depression
memory + cognition
STM interference
disrupted LTM retrieval (recall more than recognition)
weak state-dependent retrieval effects
interference w/ knowledge acquisition
in general:
fragmented speech
forgetting what user or others have asid
loosening of associations
perception of great insights (but w/o analysis + after intoxication insights are not really so great)
marijuana motor control effects
impaired motor control, coordination, + performance
glutamate inhibited in basal ganglia + disrupted cerebellum activity
paradoxically, also therapeutic effects for degenerative motor diseases
less detrimental than alcohol for driving but still a causal factor in accidents
actually makes drivers more cautious + try to compensate but can’t do it well enough
marijuana cardiovascular effects
initially
increase in BP and HR
repeated use
decrease in BP from vasodilation
to compensate, HR increases »» problems in those w/ cardiac hx or susceptibility
but - no evidence that it’s associated directly w/ cardiovascular events
tolerance and dependence: marijuana
tolerance noted after repeated administration of high doses in mice
mechanism = apparent decrease in cannabinoid receptor activation
*most users do not use such high doses!
dependence + withdrawal are noted w/ chronic use (cravings, depression, aggressiveness, irritability)
CONTROVERSY
proponents say no, opponents say yes
tolerance and dependence self-administration experiments
lever pressing for direct drug administration
squirrel monkeys showed high abuse potential demonstrated by continued lever pressing
tolerance and dependence w/ addictive drugs
addictive drugs produce sensitization in DA neurons in mesolimbic reward system in mice
observed as behavioral sensitization + increased locomotor activity
cannabinoids can - under certain conditions - produce tolerance and dependence in both animals and humans