- are symbols: stand for something without being part of it. - are arbitrary: the sounds /dog/ mean "dog" but there is nothing dog-like about the sounds - have reference: stand for their referents, not just accompany them
2
New cards
Context-bound words
words children only say in a specific context
3
New cards
Are children's first words all context-bound words? Or are some first words already referential?
- longitudinal, observational study of 4 English-learning infants - recorded all language production - examined whether first 10 words were context-bound or not - results: children's first 10 words included both context-bound and referential words - role of input: the "context" of the context-bound words was the mother's most frequent usage
4
New cards
The first 50 words
- acquired around 18 months - of first 50 words, 45% are nouns and only 3% are verbs
5
New cards
Natural Partitions Hypothesis
- meanings linked to verbs are harder to learn because 1. nouns typically refer to objects, which are easy to perceive and are stable in the environment 2. verbs typically refer to actions that are transient and relational
6
New cards
Theory: different learning mechanisms in acquisition of nouns and verbs
- the meanings of nouns can be learned by mapping sounds onto the nonlinguistic context - the meanings of verbs often require a syntactic frame that identifies the nature of the relationship involved
7
New cards
Do all children show the noun bias, cross-linguistically and cross-culturally?
- 8- to 16-month-olds learning English, Cantonese, or Mandarin - parents completed a checklist of words their child could produce - results: object nouns and action words were more similar in frequency in Cantonese and Mandarin than in English - role of parental input and syntax in acquisition of nouns among English learners
8
New cards
Underextensions
when children use a word in fewer contexts than they should ("dog" to refer only to collies)
9
New cards
overextensions
when children use a word in more contexts than they should ("Daddy" to refer to all adult men)
10
New cards
Why do children overextend word meanings?
- experimental study with 2-year-olds - children named three pictures (priming) and then a target object - one picture was perceptually similar to the target object - results: priming led to higher rates of overextension of the primed word
11
New cards
Word Spurt
after children acquire 50 words (around 18 months), they begin acquiring words at a much faster rate
12
New cards
Is the Word Spurt real?
- some children may show spurts, but these are highly individualistic and may depend on specific experiences - word spurt may not happen at the same time for every child
13
New cards
Word comprehension
- children can understand much more than they can say - children's word comprehension can begin as young as 5 months
14
New cards
Measuring infants' word comprehension
- tested 6-9-month-old infants - parents wore a visor and headphones and repeated sentences that they heard (ex. "Can you find the banana?") - results: even the youngest children (ages 6-7 months) looked longer at the labeled picture, indicating word comprehension
15
New cards
follow-up study with children ages 6-20 months
- results: all ages were above chance at looking at target picture, but there was a big improvement between 13-14 months
16
New cards
Referential style
more nouns and fewer social expressions
17
New cards
Expressive style
more social expressions and fewer nouns
18
New cards
Sources of the referential/expressive difference
- mothers who spend more time teaching labels for objects tend to have more referential children - first-born children of college-educated parents are more likely to be referential - children may simply differ in style
19
New cards
Larger vocabularies are found among children who...
- hear more speech from adults - hear more variation in words and kinds of sentences - hear more decontextualized language (talk about the past and future, pretend play, and definitions) - hear words in more elaborative contexts - hear speech that is responsive to their own behavior (especially for infants under 18 months) - are first-born - are of high SES household
20
New cards
Word segmentation
ability to break stream of speech sounds into distinct words
21
New cards
Transitional probabilities in speech sounds
- speech stream contained 3-syllable "words" that were only distinguished by their transitional probabilities - 8-month-olds discriminated words versus part-words after 2 minutes of listening
22
New cards
Are "chunks" really words for the child? Or just a sound sequence?
8-month-olds discriminate "words" from non-words in an English-language context but not a nonsense context
23
New cards
Stress as a cue to word segmentation
- in English, stress is usually on the first syllable - infants can use stress as a cue to word boundaries as early as 9 months
24
New cards
What happens if transitional probabilities and stress cues do not coincide?
when pitted against each other, 8-month-old English-language learners used stress cues instead of transitional probabilities
25
New cards
The whole-object assumption
a new word refers to a whole object, not to actions, parts of objects, or properties of objects
26
New cards
The mutual-exclusivity assumption
children assume each object has only one name
27
New cards
The taxonomic assumption
- words refer to things of the same kind
28
New cards
shape bias
children preferentially attend to shape to determine category membership
29
New cards
Training the shape bias
17-month-olds were randomly assigned to 2 conditions
30
New cards
shape bias training
7 weeks of training (novel objects with the same shape, but different texture and color, were labeled with the same novel word) - control: no training - results: shape-bias training increased learning of object names but not other words
31
New cards
Challenges to word-learning assumptions
- whole-object assumption must be overridden when a child learns names for parts or properties - mutual-exclusivity assumption must be overridden for synonyms and reference to objects at different taxonomic levels - taxonomic assumption must be overridden for proper names
32
New cards
Syntactic bootstrapping
children's ability to use syntactic cues to help them learn words
33
New cards
Syntax
the component of grammar that governs the order of words in sentences
34
New cards
Descriptive grammatical rules
implicit grammatical rules that all speakers of a language follow unconsciously
35
New cards
prescriptive grammatical rules
taught in classes and by parents, markers of etiquette and education
36
New cards
Adult syntax knowledge is a combination of...
linear order, grammatical categories, hierarchical structure
37
New cards
The productivity/generativity of language
we can produce an infinite number of sentences that we have never heard before
38
New cards
Vertical constructions
a sequence of one-word sentences that are meaningfully connected
39
New cards
Unanalyzed word combinations
sequences of words for which children have probably memorized the whole sequence rather than separate words
40
New cards
Open-class words
- content words, mostly nouns, verbs and adjectives - open in the sense that we add to this class of words all the time - typical of two-word utterances
41
New cards
Closed-class words
- fixed set of function words, including 1. auxiliaries (can, do, will) 2. prepositions (in, below, of) 3. determiners (the, those, an) 4. complementizers (that, which, who)
42
New cards
Early three-word speech
sounds a bit like a telegraph message, composed exclusively of open-class content words
43
New cards
Why don't children use more closed-class words?
- because they are not necessary to convey meaning; they reserve their limited processing space for critical elements - they leave out elements that are phonetically less prominent - they may not understand the functions of closed-class words
44
New cards
Morphology
- smallest unit that has meaning in a language - combinatorial - free ("truck" in trucks) or bound ("s" in trucks) - derivational (flawLESS, drinkABLE) or inflectional (walkED, walkING)
45
New cards
Morphological development in children acquiring English
- takes children many months to reliably use even very common inflectional morphemes - different morphemes are acquired at different times but in a very similar order among children
46
New cards
Morphological development in children acquiring languages other than English
- children acquiring rich systems of morphological inflections acquire grammatical morphemes as early/sometimes earlier than they acquire word order - following factors help children acquire morphemes earlier 1. highly frequent use 2. highly regular systems with few exceptions 3. higher perceptual salience (ex. stressed syllables)
47
New cards
Expressing negation
children express negation early on before they can use adult-like syntax
48
New cards
Asking questions
- yes/no questions: first questions are marked only by intonation - WH-questions: who, what when, where - later, children begin to produce auxiliaries and subject-auxiliary inversion
49
New cards
Individual differences in grammatical development
- some children start combining words into 2-word utterances before 18 months, while others do not do so until after 24 months
50
New cards
syntactic development is often measured
by the Mean Length of Utterance (MLU) MLU can be measured in terms of words or morphemes
51
New cards
Nativist theory
- the capacity for learning language is innate, including guidance about the abstract structure of all languages - learning a language is like learning to walk
52
New cards
Principles and parameters theory
- nativist
53
New cards
Universal Grammar is like a switchboard
a set of parameters, each with a few possible settings - experience with a specific language "triggers" the correct parameter settings for that language
54
New cards
Constructivist theory
- children construct their grammatical knowledge from their experiences with language - early grammatical knowledge may not be abstract children may be conservative in their early language production, not going beyond what they hear
55
New cards
Usage-based accounts
- children acquire words and constructions which they combine in limited ways - learning is driven by children's communicative skills and ability to find patterns
56
New cards
The connectionist approach
- connectionist nets make associations among elements in the input - what we see as "rules" emerge from the interaction of the input and the net
57
New cards
Different verbs have different argument structures
ditransitive, intransitive, and transitive
58
New cards
ditransitive
"give" has 3 arguments associated with it: giver, given, givee
59
New cards
transitive
"eat" has 2 arguments associated with it: eater, eaten -->
60
New cards
intransitive
"sleep" has 1 argument associated with it: sleeper -->
61
New cards
Evidence for item-specificity
- diary study, age 16-24 months - child used limited sentence frames for most verbs - new utterances were most closely related to previous sentences with that specific verb, not that verb category
62
New cards
elicited production study
34-month-olds and 41-month-olds- heard a new verb in passive sentences - only 20% of younger children and 55% of older children produced an active transitive sentence
63
New cards
Verb island hypothesis
- each specific verb has its own set of rules - there is no general rule that applies to all verbs
64
New cards
Evidence for productivity
- children commonly produce overregularizations and overgeneralizations - at first, children produce irregular forms correctly - then, they overregularize - later, they return to correct usage
65
New cards
Is grammatical knowledge abstract?
- 2-year-olds children viewed videos on two screens - infants were familiarized with the stimuli using familiar verbs
66
New cards
test phase: animation
- results: children were significantly above chance, consistent with abstract knowledge of verb argument structure - 21-month-olds were above chance at looking at the correct video when "bunny" and "duck" were changed to "girl" and "boy" - suggests that by 21 months, infants' knowledge of verb argument structure is abstract, not limited to specific verbs that they have learned
67
New cards
Evidence for abstractness
- children produce rule-based forms they have never heard before - children comprehend new verbs based on their syntactic frames
68
New cards
The case for multiple systems (abstract and item-specific)
- many researchers believe that children and adults sometimes use memorized forms and sometimes use abstract rules - regular pasts can be represented with rules (add -ed) - irregular forms must be memorized (go --> went, eat --> ate)
69
New cards
The tadpole-frog problem
If children's and adults' knowledge is qualitatively different, how does developmental change occur?
70
New cards
Solutions to tadpole-frog problem
- Solution 1: There are no tadpoles. There is developmental continuity because children have abstract, rule-based grammatical knowledge from the start.
71
New cards
Solution 2:
There are no frogs. There is developmental continuity because even adults' grammatical knowledge is not abstract.
72
New cards
Solution 3:
There are tadpoles and frogs. There is developmental discontinuity, accounted for by learning or maturation.
73
New cards
In the U.S., about _________% of people speak more than one language.
20-25
74
New cards
Simultaneous bilingualism
child learns multiple languages from birth
75
New cards
Sequential bilingualism
child begins to acquire another language after starting to acquire a first language
76
New cards
Majority language
spoken by the majority of individuals in a society
77
New cards
minority language
any language not spoken by the majority of the community
78
New cards
Heritage language
language of the culture in which a child was born
79
New cards
Language differentiation
child's knowledge that they are being exposed to two languages and eventual ability to separate them
Initially, children do not differentiate languages, fusing them into one. Differentiation occurs later.
82
New cards
Autonomous differentiation
Children separate languages, acquiring each separately. Rate and process of development are independent in each language.
83
New cards
Interdependent differentiation:
Children separate languages, but they influence one other during acquisition.
84
New cards
Phonological differentiation
- infants' perception becomes tuned to their native language from age 6-12 months - by 12 months, bilingual infants get better at distinguishing the phonemic contrasts in both languages
85
New cards
Do children create two different lexicons at the same time?
- If children have a fused language, they should apply mutual exclusivity, and learn one label for each concept. - If children have differentiated languages, they can suspend mutual exclusivity to learn two labels for the same concept. - Result: Between 30-50% of bilingual children's vocabularies consist of translation equivalents.
86
New cards
Bilingual learners must have suspended mutual exclusivity assumption
suggests that their lexicons are differentiated
87
New cards
Syntactic differentiation
- evidence suggests that bilingual children create separate syntactic systems - bilingual children, like bilingual adults, do mix words from both languages into the same sentences
88
New cards
Does bilingual language learning change the way language develops?
the overall course of development is very similar for monolingual and bilingual children
89
New cards
Does bilingual language learning change the rate of language development?
- simultaneous bilingual infants and monolingual infants - observed at age 1 year 10 months, 2 years 1 month, and 2 years 6 months - at each age, parents reported for each language separately their child's vocabulary and syntax - results: bilingual learners lagged the monolingual learners in vocabulary in each language, and bilingual children were less likely than monolinguals to produce two-word utterances in each languag
90
New cards
Do bilinguals eventually catch up to monolinguals in a single language?
- vocabulary: possibly not, differences exist at all ages tested
91
New cards
- syntax and morphology:
yes by age 10, with consistent exposure and usage of both languages
92
New cards
Bilinguals' OVERALL language development is ______________________________ than monolinguals'.
the same as or better
93
New cards
Variable properties of bilingual environments
- societal factors - heritage language culture - household composition
94
New cards
Does amount of exposure to language matter?
percentage of language exposure is correlated with vocabulary and syntax
95
New cards
Vocabulary in English is positively related to...
- amount of exposure to English - number of different sources of English - amount of English that comes from native speakers
96
New cards
Recent work has found bilingual advantages for...
- theory of mind (TOM): understanding others' mental states - executive function: ability to control attention and to flexibly shift attention
97
New cards
Do bilingual children do better than monolinguals on language-specific TOM tasks, all TOM tasks, or all information-processing tasks?
- bilingual and monolingual children
98
New cards
- completed three tasks: Standard Theory of Mind, Modified Theory of Mind (language switch), control task (no mental states)
- results: bilinguals out-performed monolinguals on both theory of mind tasks (hypothesized to be due to general enhancement of executive function)
99
New cards
Do bilingual children have better executive function than monolinguals?
- bilingual 6-year-olds
100
New cards
color-shape task switching
- results: bilinguals were faster than monolinguals when switching between rules