Ontological Arguments for the Existence of God

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/19

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 9:07 AM on 7/8/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

20 Terms

1
New cards

Analytic Proposition

A statement where the predicate is contained within the subject (e.g., "A bachelor is an unmarried man").

2
New cards

Synthetic Proposition

A statement requiring external observation or checking to verify if it is true.

3
New cards

Necessary Being

A being that cannot not exist; its non-existence is logically impossible.

4
New cards

Contingent Being

A being that depends on something else for its existence and can cease to exist.

5
New cards

Predicate

A grammatical term for a property, characteristic, or attribute ascribed to a subject.

6
New cards

Anselm's Definition of God

"That than which nothing greater can be conceived" (TTWNGCBC).

7
New cards

Descartes' Ontological Argument

Argues God is a "supremely perfect being" and existence is a necessary perfection.

8
New cards

Descartes' Triangle/Mountain Analogy

Existence cannot be separated from God, just as 180° cannot be separated from a triangle.

9
New cards

Malcolm's Core Argument

God's existence is either impossible or necessary; since it is not impossible, it must be necessary.

10
New cards

Gaunilo's "Perfect Island"

An ad absurdum counter arguing that Anselm's logic could prove the existence of an imaginary perfect island.

11
New cards

Anselm's Reply to Gaunilo

The argument only applies to God, who has an intrinsic maximum perfection, unlike contingent islands.

12
New cards

Bertrand Russell's Critique

The ontological argument confuses grammatical use of words with actual tracking of reality.

13
New cards

The Logical Gap

The barrier of using finite, empirical human language to define an infinite, transcendent God.

14
New cards

Via Negativa (The Apophatic Way)

The philosophical tradition arguing we can only describe God by stating what He is not.

15
New cards

Pseudo-Dionysius's View

God is beyond assertion; positive terms like 'Perfect' mislead us using limited human concepts.

16
New cards

Maimonides' Ship Analogy

Describing what a ship is not gets closer to the truth than positive human attributes.

17
New cards

Aquinas' Analogy Critique

We do not know God's true essence, making His existence not self-evident through language.

18
New cards

A.J. Ayer's Critique

Statements about a transcendent God are metaphysical nonsense and literally meaningless.

19
New cards

Anselm's Defense on Comprehension

His definition sets a structural limit ('absolute ceiling') rather than fully mapping God's mind.

20
New cards

Descartes' Trademark Argument

Our concept of an infinite, perfect being is hardwired in our minds by God.