1/86
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Responsibility
One of the most prevalent themes
Role of the I is to highlight actions have consequences
Message that people need to be accountable for their actions and take responsibility for others
Responsibility: Knowledge and Evidence
In demands each character be held and admit personal responsibility for what led to Ev death
Each character has a connection with Ev, regardless of how fleeting their actions influenced her fate
Sh is the first to accept responsibility for her actions which demonstrates her courage and empathy
Er initially offers to marry Ev which shows an attempt at responsibility
However, he fails his duty as the father to protect them both
In urges characters and audience to consider their social responsibility arguing they have a duty to have actions which benefit society
Through the In, Priestley argues society has duties towards the welfare of others
Suggests they have a collective social responsibility to care for eachother
Ar and Sy hold prominent positions in society, the In suggests they have an even greater duty to care for others
In alludes ideas of responsibility and duty, Ar and Sy repeatedly use these words despite interpreting them differently
In contrast, Priestley presents Ev as having a greater sense of moral responsibility
A pivotal part of act 3 is when the In leaves, provides an opportunity for characters to reveal if they have learnt from his message
Only Er and Sh grasp his message, everyone else is blind to it
Responsibility: Priestleys Intention
Emphasises the importance of both personal and social responsibility
Insists this extends beyond the confines of the family unit and spreads to society as a whole
Could be argues some acts committed by the Birlings and Gerald may not be so terrible individually to drive Eva to suicide
Priestley emphasises that individual actions may begin a chain of events leading to devastating consequence
Capitalism vs Socialism
Play deals with ideas of fairness and inequality
Priestley used the play to argue that capitalism prevented equality and social justice
Socialism aims to share out wealth creating a fair society
Capitalism vs Socialism: Knowledge and Evidence
P presents a powerful social message which is explored through this theme
Capitalism benefits individuals
Socialism benefits society
P depicts comfortable, affluent life of the Birlings who thrive on Capitalism
Contrasts to Ev wretched life from their greed
Ev is exploited and marginalised by those in the privilege Capitalist system
P maintains that the system creates and perpetuates inequalities and prevents social mobility
Ev is trapped in a cycle of poverty which she never overcomes
In moralistic tone condemns the entrenched capitalist view of the group
Message that we are all part of one community is firmly established
Ar is resistant, insisting his responsibility is to protect his business
No sense of responsibility/concern that his workers need higher wages to live
Treats the pay strike at his factory with his contempt because it threatens his profit
Capitalism vs Socialism: Priestleys Intention
Presents the Birlings and Capitalism in a negative light through the Inspector
Presented as individualistic, self centred and amoral
Place profit and greed above rights and concerns of others
Seeks to expose selfishness
Encouraging others to look after eachother
Encouraging working towards an equal, fair society
Generational Divide
Younger characters are more open to social and economic change
In conflict with their parents generation, who are stuck in their ways
Generational Divide: Knowledge and Evidence
P attempts to reveal inadequacies of Ar and Sy parenting
Fail to acknowledge Sh and Er as adults
Offer little support
Ignore Er alcoholism which may be due to their indulgence
Attempt to shield Sh from hearing details about ‘women of the town’
P portrays Ar, Sy, Ge as fully entrenched in upper class notions of superiority
Ar and Sy mock Sh and Er foolishness for being so affected
Er and Sh do not share the sense of relief at the end
In shows the audience that all characters have had an opportunity for redemption, only Sh and Er embrace is
Ge displays some remorse for his treatment of Ev but reverts back at the end
Older generation is more concerned about social positions
Ge falls between the 2 generations
P shows that the younger generation can change and accept social responsibility
Sh challenges her parents for not learning from the In
Younger generation present a symbol of hope
Generational Divide: Priestleys Intention
Priestley offers optimism through Sheila and Eric to show the audience the younger generation is capable of change
Depicts the younger generation as more compassionate and empathetic
Suggests they don’t avoid social responsibilities
Priestley suggests the younger generation will avoid errors of the previous generation
Suggests the selfish and exploitative Capitalist system will be replaced with a more Socialist agenda
Guilt
Result of accepting personal and social responsibility
Younger characters express guilt
Older generation are not guilty, they are unwilling to see their own flaws and society’s flaws
Guilt: Knowledge and Evidence
In contends if the characters learn anything, they must express guilt
Admission of guilt requires self reflection
Important step in encouraging change
Guilt is both individual and collective
Believes each character compromised their morals in the treatment of Eva
Represent the upper classes who have enabled lower classes to be exploited and mistreated for their own gain
Sh is first to express guilt
In then insists that guilt and responsibility must be shared
Er eventually expresses guilt, but only willing in act 3
Expresses a stronger sense (emotional outburst), immaturity suggests he doesn’t feel it as keenly as his sister
Ge appears to have sincere and honest regret, his guilt is temporary
Justifies his actions
Doesn’t care when there’s no consequence
More concerned his affair has been found out rather than betraying Sh
Ar and Sy refuse to express any guilt
Fail to see and acknowledge they have done anything wrong
Guilt: Priestleys Intention
Guilt felt by characters and society must be personal and collective for change to happen
We are responsible for our personal conduct
Should ensure all groups are treated equally
Class
Criticises the inequality and unfairness of British class system
Argues the privilege of class blinds people to their immoral behavior
Class: Knowledge and Evidence
Major influence on may characters and events
Immense inequality is established at the start
Birlings opulent home sharply contrasts with workers in Ar factory
Sy could be viewed as making incorrect assertions about working class and views them as morally and socially inferior
Ignorantly links class with morality
Cannot believe Ev, working class girl refused stolen money
Sy hypocritical stance means she overlooks her own selfish, immoral acts and those of the upper class
Class affords her superiority to decide who is/isnt worth charity
Overlooks Ge keeping a mistress and Er immoral conduct with Ev
P demonstrates how working class especially women could be exploited and abused by those with wealth/power
Ge and Er abuse their power and status in relationship
Both discard Ev when it suits them
Ge is entrenched in the views of his class system
Prevents him from genuinely empathising with Eva/working class plight
Class: Priestleys Intention
Priestley demonstrates fixation of upper class on status and poor morals
P conveys hypocrisy of upper class and abuse of power over working class
Clearest in the treatment of working class girls by young, wealthy men
Gender
Priestley explores inequality between male and female characters
Criticising society’s suppression of women’s rights and mistreatment of women in general
Gender: Knowledge and Evidence
Important element impacting most behaviours of characters
Ev would be viewed as ‘cheap labour’ and more at risk of being exploited and abused because of her gender
Working class women cheapest form of labour for Ar
Ev is exploited by wealthy men and women
Sy and Sh use their power to suppress her
Ge and Er take advantage of her due to power imbalance
Ge emphasises how Ev was desperate for help and portrays himself as being chivalrous in rescuing her
Sh can be viewed as a woman who is redefining the role of women at a time when woman’s rights were being sought during the suffragettes movement
Begins playing a typical role in patriarchal society
Contrasts as the play develops and she begins to challenge her father and Gerald
Gender: Priestleys Intention
Priestley uses male and female characters to comment upon traditional gender roles
Sybil is subordinate to her husband
Sheila begins to challenge this role
Eva is an assertive female character
Priestley highlights the suppression of women’s rights and how men and women can abuse their power
Birlings and Gerald all take advantage of Eva in different ways because of her gender
“If we are all responsible for everything that happened to everybody — it would be vert awkward wouldn’t it”
Act One
Mr Birling
Mr Birling refuses to accept his part in Eva Smiths death
“At least I’m trying to tell the truth, I expect you’ve done things you’re ashamed of too.”
Act One
Sheila
Sheila begins to understand her responsibility - even when Gerald and her parents will not
“Public men, Mr Birling, have responsibilities as well as privileges”
Act Two
Inspector Goole
The Inspector makes it clear that the wealthy should help the poor
“We don’t live alone. We are members of one body. We are responsible for eachother”
Act Three
Inspector Goole
The Inspector uses the metaphor of a body to show the physical connection between people in society and how people depend on one another
“We did her in alright”
Act Three
Eric
Eric, like Sheila, recognises the truth and changes for the better
Guilt and Responsibility: The Telephone Call
Concludes the play
Symbolises that there will be consequences for those who refuse to accept responsibility for their actions
Guilt and Responsibility: The Inspector
Embodies social responsibility
Holds each character to account for their role in the ‘chain of events’ leading to Evas death
Guilt and Responsibility: Mr and Mrs Birling
Representation of a selfish older generation
Occupy an important position in society
Fail in their duty to care for others
Guilt and Responsibility: Sheila and Eric
Represent the potential for a more progressive younger generation to show greater collective responsibility
Impact of Guilt: The Inspector
Priestleys mouthpiece for his socialist ideology
Emphasises personal and collective responsibility
Argues wealthy have a responsibility to support most vulnerable in society
Message has a lasting, transformative effect on younger members of the family but not the older characters
Impact of Guilt: Mr and Mrs Birling
Use the words ‘responsibility’ and ‘duty’ to describe their selfish behaviors, but begin the ‘chain of events’
Mr Birling fires Eva
Mrs Birling abuses her power in the Brumley Women’s Charity
Cruelty leads to Eva killing herself and her unborn baby
Impact of Guilt: Gerald
Appears contrite when the Inspector reveals his responsibility for the suicide of ‘Daisy Renton’, but later calls the Inspector a hoax
Tries to give Sheila her ring back, symbolising he learns nothing
Impact of Guilt: Sheila
Feels deep guilt and regret for getting Eva fired
Represents younger generations acceptance of their responsibility to others
Impact of Guilt: Eric
Raped Eva before stealing from Mr Birling to support her
Shocks the audience by revealing this after Mrs Birlings actions lead to the babies death
Demonstrates a capacity to change and an acceptance of his socialist responsibility
Refuses to accept Geralds ‘hoax’ claim
Why Priestley uses Guilt and Responsibility: Setting and Period
Priestley underscores how the wealthiest enjoy privileges and lives of excess, while refusing to show compassion for the opposite
Demonstrates the consequences of selfishness and ignorance
Why Priestley uses Guilt and Responsibility: Plot Driver
Plot is structured around the Inspectors interrogations, revealing guilt and responsibility one by one
Reveals the chain of events that connect individuals and the importance of responsibility
Why Priestley uses Guilt and Responsibility: Audience Appeal
Sheila and Eric represent Priestleys 1945 audience - a more progressive and responsible generation
Mr/Mrs Birling and Gerald reflect blinkered attitudes of older generation whose irresponsibility would unsettle a 1945 audience
Why Priestley uses Guilt and Responsibility: Dramatic Device
Creates dramatic irony - the audience realise before the Birlings do that each will be interrogated, and that each bears some guilt
Leads to dramatic tension, such as the cliffhangers at the end of each act
“For lower costs and higher prices”
Act One
Mr Birling
Mr Birlings business strategy is pure greed: he wants to charge lots and pay little
“She sails next week…unsinkable, absolutely unsinkable”
Act One
Mr Birling
Mr Birlings comment about the Titanic reflects the blind faith of his generation in capitalism
“…its better to ask for the earth than to take it”
Act One
Inspector Goole
The Inspector uses Mr Birlings own words against him to highlight his selfishness
“I wasn’t satisfied with the girls claim…she seemed to me to be not a good case”
Act Two
Mrs Birling
Mrs Birling equates money with ones ‘claim’, as though money only belongs to the deserving
Elements of Capitalism vs Socialism: The Inspector
Embodies socialism
His investigation and moralistic speeches condemn how the poor and impoverished are victims of capitalist greed
Elements of Capitalism vs Socialism: Mr Birling and Gerald Croft
Represent the greedy industrialists who treat workers as cheap labour and refuse to raise wages
Elements of Capitalism vs Socialism: Eva Smith
Tragic fate shows the destructive potential of capitalism
Fired for seeking a living wage
Denied charity on the basis of her perceived worth
Impact of Capitalism vs Socialism: The Birlings
Priestley contracts their comfortable, affluent life with Evas wretched life
Gerald also believes that Mr Birlings was right to sack a ‘troublemaker’
Mr Birling is resistant to the Inspectors message, protects his business to maximise profits
Treats his workers with contempt
No sense of responsibility or concern for their welfare
Impact of Capitalism vs Socialism: The Inspector
Inspector personifies socialist ideology by acting for the benefit of others
Central message is that everyone is connected by a ‘chain of events’; the actions of the upper class affect the less fortunate
Inspector seizes control of the Birlings celebration
Symbolises Priestleys hope that socialism could overcome capitalism
Impact of Capitalism vs Socialism: The Inspector
Inspector personifies socialist ideology by acting for the benefit of others
Central message is that everyone is connected by a ‘chain of events’; the actions of the upper class affect the less fortunate
Inspector seizes control of the Birlings celebration
Symbolises Priestleys hope that socialism could overcome capitalism
Impact of Capitalism vs Socialism: Eva Smith
Exploited and marginalised by the capitalist system despite being a good worker
Through the Inspector, Priestley maintains that this system creates inequalities in society and prevents social mobility
Why Priestley uses Capitalism vs Socialism: Setting and Period
Priestley underscores how the wealthiest enjoy privileges and lives of excess but are blind to the effects of their actions on the less fortunate
The play is a microcosm of capitalist society, set in an industrial city, in a wealthy manufacturers house
Why Priestley uses Capitalism vs Socialism: Plot Driver
Plot demonstrates what happens when powerful, greedy people prioritise money over wellbeing of fellow people
Eva Smith represents ‘millions and millions and millions’ of impoverished people oppressed by an economic system that puts profit before people
Why Priestley uses Capitalism vs Socialism: Audience Appeal
1945 audience was a more progressive and responsible generation, aware of workers rights
Mr/Mrs Birling and Gerald reflect an outdated ideology from which society was seeking to move away
“Arthur, you’re not supposed to say such things”
Act One
Mrs Birling
Mrs Birling reprimands her husband for the mistake of acknowledging their working class cook
“We’re respectable citizens and not criminals”
Act One
Mr Birling
Mr Birling believes that his class places him above the law, something that the Inspector disputes
“Girls of that class…”
Act Two
Mrs Birling
Mrs Birling refuses to show empathy or compassion for Eva because of her class
Elements of Class: Settings
Birlings opulent house is sharply contrasted with descriptions of the workers in Arthurs factory
Elements of Class: Prejudice
Upper class characters frequently make incorrect assertions about the working classes and view them as morally and socially inferior
Birlings, particularly Sybil, and Gerald are entrenched in the views of their class system
Genuinely cannot emphasise with the working class/Evas plight
Elements of Class: Exploitation
Eric and Gerald use their class and status to take advantage of Eva
Keep their relationship with her a secret to avoid reputational damage
Impact of Class: The Birlings
Depicts their comfortable, affluent life in contrast to Evas poverty
Mr Birlings is concerned that the wealthier Crofts might see Gerald and Sheilas engagement as a step down in society
Mrs Birling ignorantly links class with morality, refusing to believe Eva would refuse stolen money
Impact of Class: The Inspector
Suggests the class system creates inequalities in society, preventing social mobility
Investigation reveals the immoral behaviour of the ‘respectable’ upper classes
Impact of Class: Eva Smith
Considered ‘cheap labour’ by Mr Birling and Gerald
Exploited and marginalised by more privileged characters
Class differences are a metaphorical ‘wall’
A barrier put up by the wealthy to separate them from the impoverished and vulnerable
Sheila warns her mother not to ‘build up a kind of wall’ between herself and Eva
Why Priestley uses Class: Setting and Period
Underscores how the wealthiest enjoy privileges and lives of excess, but are blind to effects of their actions on the less fortunate
Challenges the outdated values of the upper classes through the Inspecor, who speaks for Priestleys audience when he champions workers rights
Why Priestley uses Class: Plot Driver
Revelations about how the Birling family have abused their class and social status provide a clear dramatic structure
Why Priestley uses Class: Audience Appeal
Plays action is driven by revelations about immorality of Edwardian upper classes
Contemporary 1945 audience were more progressive, responsible and aligned with socialist values
Why Priestley uses Class: Conflict between Characters
Priestley quickly establishes the theme of class and conflict in the opening act
“…men with important work to do sometimes have to spend nearly all their time and energy on their business”
Act One
Mrs Birling
Mrs Birling tells Sheila that men do more important work than women, and this reinforces that status
“She’d had a lot to say…far too much…so she had to go”
Act One
Mr Birling
Mr Birling believes that his class places him above the law, something that the Inspector disputes
“…young women ought to be protected against unpleasant and disturbing things”
Act Two
Inspector Goole
The Inspector exposes the hypocrisy of pretending to protect women while exploiting them
“An hysterical child”
Act Two
Mrs Birling
Mrs Birling belittles Sheila for questioning her, using a gendered insult often used to silent women
“[Eric] used [Eva] as if she wan an animal, not a thing, not a person”
Act Three
Inspector Goole
The Inspector describes the brutal reality of Erics treatment of Eva
Elements of Gender: Relationships
Relationship between Sheila and Gerald highlights the expectations of women in 1912 and their subservience to men
Elements of Gender: Exploitation
Gender is closely linked to class
Birlings mistreatment of Eva due to her gender and low social status
Eric and Gerald use their gender and status to exploit Eva, sexually and romantically objectifying her
Elements of Gender: Oppression
Sheila is repeatedly belittled and patronised - even by her own mother - in ways that reflect a wider silencing of women
Impact of Gender: Mr Birling, Gerald, Eric
Male characters are presented as exploiting female characters
Arthur exploits working class women as one of the cheapest forms of labour
Gerald and Eric take advantage of the imbalance of power
Gerald emphasises his chivalry in rescuing her, despite his manipulation and abuse of her
Mr Birling bargains with Sheila: a marriage to Gerald presents a business opportunity
Impact of Gender: Mrs Birling and Sheila
Sybil and Sheila use their power to suppress Eva
Mrs Birling denies Eva charity on her prejudice belief
Sheila is jealous of Evas looks and has her fired
Sheilas attitude towards woman’s right and gender roles changes as the play progresses
She begins to challenge her father more, and refuses to take back Gerald’s engagement ring
Why Priestley uses Gender: Setting and Period
Priestley uses male and female characters to comment upon traditional gender roles and emphasise the evolution of society since 1912
Highlights the suppression of women’s rights in 1912 and draws attention to the ways that men and women can abuse their power
Why Priestley uses Gender: Political Commentary
Priestleys depiction of pre war values confronts his audience with the consequences of patriarchal traditions
Eva Smith represents ‘millions and millions and millions’ of women who are oppressed
Why Priestley uses Gender: Audience Appeal
Priestleys 1945 audience would recognise the influence of gender on restricting the rights of women like Eva
Sheila plays the role of audience surrogate in the play - her growing independence represents the audiences values
“You youngsters just remember what I said”
Act One
Mr Birling
Mr Birling tells Eric, Sheila and Gerald to remember his predictions about the future - predictions the audience knows are inaccurate
“Really the things you girls pick up on these days!”
Act One
Mrs Birling
Mrs Birling criticises Sheila, suggesting that she disapproves of modern culture or behaviour that is not traditionally feminine
“We often do [make an impression] on the young”
Act Two
Inspector Goole
The Inspector suggests that the younger generation is more receptive to his socialist message
“You’re ready to go on in the same old way”
Act Three
Sheila
Sheila criticises her parents and Gerald (representing the older generation) for ignoring the Inspectors lesson about responsibility
“…the famous younger generation who know it all. And they can’t even take a joke”
Act Three
Mr Birling
Mr Birling attacks Sheilas generation (and therefore Priestleys 1945 audience) before he is proven wrong one final time
Elements of Generational Divide
Mr Birling is shown to be incorrect about his predictions for his children’s future
Making us question wisdom and attitude of the older generation
Sheila and Eric openly challenge their parents views on social responsibility and are far more receptive to the socialist message
Gerald initially seems to accept the message, but later sides with the irresponsible and ignorant older generation
Priestley shows younger members of the Birlings are capable of taking responsibility
Learn to care about the vulnerable members of society who have been exploited by greedy capitalists
Impact of Generational Divide: Mr and Mrs Birling
Mr Birling expects the younger generation to ‘just listen’ to and accept his views
Dismisses as ‘nonsense’ the idea that people need to look after one another
Inaccurate predictions about the Titanic shows his opinions cannot be trusted
Sheila argues that the Inspector is correct, Mrs Birling replies “I don’t understand you”
Shows she is incapable of understanding why she must change
Arthur and Sybil are entrenched in their upper class selfishness
Act 3: Mock Sheila and Eric for being so easily influenced
More concerned by a potential scandal than taking responsibility
Impact of Generational Divide: Sheila and Eric
Act 1: Sheila and Eric seem respectful of their fathers views
Sheila is especially childlike and subordinate
Contrasts to her behaviour as the play develops and she becomes more challenging
Eric highlights the problems with their parenting
Describes his father as ‘not the kind of father a chap could go to when he’s in trouble’
Parents disbelief at Erics drinking and involvement reveals how blinkered the older generation is
Eric and Sheila listen to and understand the socialist message
Play ends with the suggestion that the younger generation will be more responsible than their forebears
Why Priestley uses Generational Divide: Setting and Period
Ignorant attitudes of Mr Birlings generation are presented to emphasise his 1945 audience how society has developed since 1912
Redeems the characters of Eric and Sheila to suggest that their generation is capable of learning difficult lessons and enacting positive social change
Why Priestley uses Generational Divide: Political Commentary
Pre-war values (unregulated capitalist greed and an absence of social care) confronts his audience with the awful consequences of patriarchal traditions
Goole emphasises that “the young ones” are more receptive to the socialism and progressive movements emerged after WW2
Why Priestley uses Generational Divide: Audience Appeal
1945 audience were members of a more progressive and responsible generation
Sheila and Eric are therefore effective as audience surrogates
Newfound morals and sense of responsibility represent the values of a post war audience