1/64
lecture & textbook
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
attraction
positive feelings and evaluations we have towards other people
factors involved in attraction
familiarity, similarity, physical attractiveness, reciprocity
familiarity
we prefer people who we are familiar with
main finding of Westgate study
students in res asked to name 3 closest freinds, most said next door neighbours and those 2 doors down vs those in opposite hallways
similarity
we prefer people who are similar to us
main finding from study of familiarity
when someone attended the course more, they were more liked by students in the class
physical attractiveness
we are attracted to people we find physically attractive
the halo effect
this cognitive bias occurs when we attribute positive qualities like intelligence, kindness, success and morality to physically attractive individuals
reciprocity
we prefer people who reciprocate liking
self-disclosure
sharing intimate info and feelings with another person which signifies trust
social exchange theory
a relationship as a cost benefit calculation
reward (social exchange theory)
what am I getting out of this relationship?
cost (social exchange theory)
what is this relationship costing me?
comparison level (social exchange theory)
expectations about the ratio of cost to rewards that I deserve
bystander effect
a person who witnesses someone else in need is less likely to help when other bystanders are present
diffusion of responsibility
feeling less responsible because other people are able to help
pluralistic ignorance
assuming that nothing is wrong because no one else looks concerned
prejudice
negative attitude towards a group of people
3 components of prejudice
beliefs, emotions, actionse
beliefs (prejudice)
stereotypes about a group
emotions (prejudice)
feelings about a group
actions (prejudice)
discriminatory behaviour towards a group
scapegoating theory of prejudice
prejudice is the result of displaced frustration and/or fear
main finding of Sherif et al Robbers cave study
when contact between groups is cooperative and done on equal footing, you tend to see a reduction in prejudice
3 conditions for positive contact
equal status, common goals, opportunity for friendship
need to affiliate
innate need to associate with others
social exchanges
transfers of attention, info, affection, and favours in addition to personal info
triangular theory of love
different forms of love arise from different combinations of 3 basic components:
intimacy
passion
commitment
romantic love
based on intimacy and high levels of passion
companionate love
intimacy and commitment but no passion
fatuous love
passion and commitment but no intimacy
evolutionary psychology
study of evolutionary origins of behaviour patterns
prosocial behaviour
any action that benefits another person, and there is a cost to the person providing the action
altruism
prosocial behaviour motivated by improving circumstances of others
empathy
when being faced with someone who is suffering, the individual experiences feelings that parallel
3 decision points before offering help (bystander effect)
noticing, defining an emergency, taking responsibility and acting
antisocial behaviour
behaviour that violates social norms and rights of others
aggression
antisocial acts that directly harm another person
bullying
behaviour that deliberately and repeatedly exposes a person to negative experiences
instinct
innate impulse that directs and motivates behaviour
frustration-aggression hypothesis
frustration leads to aggression
social learning theory
we learn to be aggressive through observation
social stereotypes
oversimplified perceptions of group members that neglects diversity
discrimination
biased actions towards particular group
microaggressions
subtle acts of discrimination that may not have negative intentions, but reflect perpetrators lack of awareness
racism
prejudice based on race
sexism
prejudice based on gender
ageism
prejudice based on age
heterosexism
belief heterosexuality is normal/better
ethnocentrism
placing one’s group at the centre as the standard for comparison
explicit prejudice
clearly expressed/out in the open
implicit prejudice
unconscious prejudiced thoughts and feelings
scapegoating
blaming person/group for the actions of others or for conditions not of their making
displaced aggression
hostilities triggered by frustration are redirected at “safer” targets
status inequalities
differences in power, prestige, privileges
authoritarian personality
ethnocentric, rigid, inhibition, oversimplification
dogmatism
unwarranted certainty in belief/opinion - close minded
dehumanization
belief that members of outgroup = less human and deserve hatred
self-stereotype
tendency to apply social stereotypes to oneself
stereotype threat
anxiety caused by fear of embodying and being judged by stereotypes
equal-status contact
interacting on equal footing without obvious power or status differences
superordinate goal
exceeds and overrides others, renders other goals as less important
individuating information
info that helps define person as an individual, rather than member of group/social category
just world beliefs
belief that people generally get what they deserve
social competition
rivalry amongst groups, each of which regards itself as superior to others