1/6
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Effects of migration in the short run
Capitalists and Land owners better off
Workers worse off ( wages of workers in the countries receiving new labor decreases, and in countries from which are leaving it increases
Effects of migration in the long run
Input prices, wages and real income unchanged
Welfare effects: no change
Capitalists: no change
Rybczynski Theorem
An increase in the amount of a factor found in an economy will increase the output of the industry using that factor intensively and decrease the output of the other industry.
FDI increases output of K-intensive industry and decreases output of L-intensive industry.
Immigration increases output in L-intensive industry and decreases output in K-intensive industry.
Effects of FDI in the Short Run
Land owners: worse off
Workers real wage: better off
Capitalists welfare: worse off
Effects of FDI in the Long Run
Extra K can be absorbed in the K-intensive industry without changes in wage or rental
In the long run, mobile K and L, so:
Additional L from immigration will be absorbed by the L-intensive industry, and it will also absorb extra L and K from the K-intensive industry.
K/L does not change in the long run: factor price insensitivity
In the short run, K and L fixed, so:
Immigration reduces wages and increases rentals.