1/69
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Classical Theory
People will do what will result in the most happiness for them
People are rational thinkers with free will
People commit crime based on
A decision
Irrational thinking
The state provides people with rights, and if people don’t follow the rules they are faced with punishment
Deterrence Theory
Just deserts”
The idea that punishment keeps people from committing crimes
Punishment must be
Certain
Proportional
Applied equally
Rational choice theory
Weigh the benefits and the consequences to these crimes?
Either the pros outweigh the cons, or people are not thinking rationally!
It’s similar to classical theory in that people are weighing the cons and benefits of committing the crime
This theory does assume everyone is completely of free will and rational thinking
Has no room for crimes of passion or desperation
Biological Positivism
Criminality is something that exists in our DNA
Can be inherited through parents or through some kind of mutation
Having certain biological traits means deviance is much more likely
Causal and correlative relationships
Causal: directly related, one impacts the other
Correlative: both things are happening, they could be linked but we don’t necessarily know
Atavism
Cesare Lombroso (1911)
This theory argues that people with traits closer to apes (further notes on this in the textbook notes)
Control Theory/General Theory of Crime
Developed by Gottfredson and Hirshi in the 1960s
The idea that offenders commit crimes because of low self control
Self-control is thought to be taught during childhood so therefore poor parenting can lead to criminal behaviour
Chicago School
Group of academics at University of Chicago
Became something of a hub for sociological thought
Post-industrial revolution, urbanization was happening hella
Social Disorganization Theory
Developed by Shaw and McKay
Centric Zone Model (look up image)
Crime occurs in transitional zones
Transitory communities
Weak community attachments
Social Disorganization theory critiques
this just means that more violent crime will likely occur in transitional zones, doesn't account for more white-collar or less obvious crimes that occur in other zones
Broken window theory
Relation to social disorganization theory
Broken window = nobody taking care of the area (weak community attachments)
Routine Activity Theory (+ 3 main components)
Developed by Felson and Cohen
3 major components to this theory
What you do in your everyday life, influences how susceptible you are to both committing and being a victim of crime
Absence of a capable guardian (parents, surveillance cameras)
Dark alley abandoned building
Suitable Target
Someone smaller, weaker in some way, less likely to report
Can also include stuff (jewlery is easier to steal than a giant mounted tv)
Motivated offender
Someone with motive
Weakness: dosen’t consider where motives can come from, just assumes motivated offender
Life Course Theory
In this theory, milestones in life can turn people either towards or away from crime
Eg. loss of a loved one, having a child, divorce, etc.
What events might lead someone towards criminal activity
Childhood trauma, job loss, toxic breakup/relationship, infidelity, bullying
weakness of life course theory
We can’t know exactly what sets someone on a trajectory
Merton’s Strain Theory
What do people want? The American dream
Nuclear family, money, fulfilment
What happens when they can’t get it?
accepting/rejecting means and/or goals
who said that crime results from not being able to attain the American dream
Maeron
How does one deal with strain? (5 methods)
Conformity
Innovation
Ritualism
Retreatism
Rebellion
Agnew’s General Strain Theory
3 categories of strain
Removal of positive stimuli
Eg. losing a job or relationship
Introduction of Noxious (bad) stimuli
Not a gain or a loss, just a negative you have to deal with
A coworker sucking ass,
Rejection
Mental illness
Failure to attain positively-valued goals
Eg. not being able to graduate, missing out on a promotion, stalking
Stalking example, if they are unable to gain closer to their subject, they may commit criminal acts
difference between experiencing strain and committing crime is the coping mechanisms that are/aren’t available
Status Frustration Theory
Popularized by Albert Cohen
Criminal subcultures emerge in working class youth due to frustration with inability to reach middle class goals
Within a subculture, success can become the most deviant
People create their own communities with their own definitions of success (eg. street racers)
Differential Oppurtunity Theory
Popularized by Cloward and Ohlin
All classes have the same goals, but different opportunities to reach them
This leads to frustration and creation of subcultures
If you can’t reach popular goals, create your own that are attainable and interesting
3 Types of subcultures under differential opportunity theory
Criminal (crime with a purpose)
Organized crime
Can lead to socially acceptable success
Conflict (disorganized crime)
Street fight
Often leads to adult criminality if they survive youth
Retreatist (escapist crime)
Drug use
Crime that numbs the pain of failure to achieve societal goals
Sutherland’s Differential Association
Basic premise: criminal behaviour is learned through interactions with others
Criminality is learned through communication (not just seen, criminality needs to be discussed)
Criminality is learned in intimate social groups (acquaintances with a criminal isn’t enough, they must be close)
Criminal techniques, motives, attitudes, and rationalizations are learned
the physical how-to, you can’t just walk into a bank and embezzle. You need to learn how, you need to know someone with a motive for crime to understand that it’s an option
attitudes around crime is the basis for most communication (is someone pro or anti-crime that you’re communicating with)
critiques of differential association
How do people first develop these skills?
Assumes there is always going to be people who have this understanding of crime, but where does that knowledge originate?
Bandura’s Social Learning Theory
bobo the clown
4 requirements for learning behaviour (primarily successful at explaining youth crime)
Attention (behaviour must capture the child’s attention, or they won’t absorb it)
Retention (that child needs to retain it, if they have a bad memory, some lessons may not stick. Children who have mental illnesses for example may have more trouble retaining those lessons)
Reproduction (if the kids hadn’t been presented with the opportunity to interact with Bobo, they may not have internalized those behaviours)
Motivation (eg. steal from the big corporations, they deserve it is a belief that can be internalized)
Aker’s Differential Reinforcement Theory
Pavolv’s theory
Criminality can be learned/unlearned the same way!
Punishment and reinforcement
CPTED
Premise: the design, building, and maintenance of an area can promote or prevent crime
Key premises:
Natural surveillance (only natural! Lighting, open spaces, etc.)
Natural access control (ability to see, clear walking paths, etc.)
Territoriality/maintenance (landscaping, broken window theory)
Weaknesses of this theory
Only focuses on street crime
People can literally just move
family ties theory
When parents are either too controlling or don’t have enough involvement in the lives of their children
Helicopter parents vs absentee parent
containment theory
Your morals, your beliefs (inner containment)
Laws, family relationships (outer containment)
Social Construction Reading (Rafter)
Becker (1963) “Social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitutes deviance”
Preconceptions shaped what defined a criminal and how different groups would be treated when criminal
Critical criminology
Made to reformulate the basic issues of Marxist criminal issues
Conceptualized crime control as instruments of class struggle to maintain socioeconomic inequities
Positivism to Constructionism
The idea that legal systems need practical, applied solutions
Philosophers were starting to question the deeply rooted “facts” of life:
Eg. marriage, religion, gender, white supremacy
Social constructionists believe that reality exists, just not in a vacuum
People see observable reality through their own perspective
Eg. weather, symbols, colours
Social constructionists would ask not what is pink, but what can it mean/symbolize pink=girl is a social construction
Symbols: a ring on any finger means nothing except for the one finger
Labelling Theory
Master Status
When your label becomes your primary factor of identification
Primary deviance:
An initial toe dip of deviance
Small, typically not criminal
Opportunity for label to be applied
Secondary deviance
Results from the shift in self-image
My mom thinks I'm bad anyways, what does it matter if I act out?
The reinforcement of a label creates master status
Doesn't account for the cause of the primary deviance
Once you cut a thief’s hand off, they’re already facing the stigma of a thief so why not just continue the behaviour?
Labelling approach on policy development
Child protection laws are common examples
Youth Criminal Justice Act protects children from experiencing public identification for crimes and in turn facing labelling
Critiques of Labelling Theory
Does not offer any explanation for the initial cause of deviance, only the continuation of deviance due to secondary deviance
Marxist Criminology
Crime as an outcome of class division in society
Focused on the relationship between power and inequality
Those who wield power in society are those who own the means of production
More resources = more opportunity = more power
How certain crimes are linked to certain classes
Crimes of the powerful
Linked to personal desire for wealth or power
Economic crimes (eg. fraud, violation of labour laws)
State crimes (eg. misuse of public funds, corruption)
What are the two crimes of the less powerful
Economic crimes (eg. theft, welfare fraud)
Social crimes (eg. vandalism, assault)
Two types of crimes in marxism in general
Dominatinon
Results of class conflicts
Control (police brutality)
Government (committed directly by the government, war crimes)
Economic domination (price fixing! Fuck Loblaws, high interest rates from the government, etc.)
Resistance
In challenge of class conflicts
Predatory (theft, robbery, heavy on victimization, often financial)
Personal (ways to deal with pressures, assault, murder, sexual violence)
Resistant (protest, though people don’t take into account how this affects their fellow proletariat, stealing from someone else who is just as poor)
Critique of marxist criminology
Dosen’t account for people who commit crimes for other reasons, eg. mental illness, crimes of passion
Key Types of Capitalism
Free market capitalism
Based on libertarian principles
Supply and demand regulates the market
No government intervention
social/mixed capitalism
Government regulated
Canadian system is this
Liberal-Conflict Theory
Rather than viewing the state and the proletariat and separate and at offs, this theory sees then as just two parts of a whole of society
Conflict can exist between the public and the state, but can also exist within groups within the public eg. January 6th
Conflict can be disruptive or planned (eg. January 6th is disruptive, war is planned
The state can minimize or maximise conflict
Cultural Conflict Theory
Crime is a result of conflicting norms and values
Primary conflict: clash of core beliefs (eg. abortion rights)
Secondary conflict: clash of smaller beliefs/practices (eg. religious conflict in northern Ireland)
Us v.s. Them, with specific grievances
Deterrence relies on getting rid of difference between groups
4 waves of feminism
1st wave: suffragettes, voting rights, personhood
2nd wave: sexual violence, abortion, expanding rights, radical feminism (Ended around the 80s)
3rd wave: sexual harassment, post-modern and intersectional feminism
Post-modern: gender is a preformance to enhance levels of respect and power
4th wave, Me too, post-feminism(the work from 2nd and 3rd wave feminism have “worked”, women have freedom of choice)
Marxist feminism
Women are exploited under capitalism
Their reproductive and domestic work in undervalued
Invisible labour
Liberal feminism
Associated with neo-liberalism in politics
The idea that equality comes from equal opportunity
In crim, women having equal opportunity as men, they will also have an equal chance of choosing to commit crime
Feminist jurisprudence
emphasis on the legally built biases against women
Critical criminology
Understanding that the criminal justice system has many set in biases that advantage certain groups
Critical criminology suggests that the foundations of criminological theories are founded on the perspectives of white men, and we must critique what most criminologists say and note what they may take for granted
Critical crim structuralist approach
Focuses on power as something ingrained in social structures and is manifested through the actions of institutions
The idea that crime is defined in terms of oppression
Postcolonial theory
Emerged during the 1980s
Response to the development of radical feminism and CRT
Explores colonization’s effects on Indigenous people and the socio-political power relations between them and the government
Mainstream criminology was not adept at considering Indigenous peoples
Critical Race Theory
Mainstream criminology is founded on principles of white supremac, primarily enlightenment and liberalism
Response to liberalism: Because of the way the world is structured around race, not everyone has the same opportunities as everyone else and when they do they face discrimnation
By decentering these principles, crim can better address the experiences of racialized people
3 main ideas of CRT
Race is a social construct
Racism is ‘normal’
Racism has a purpose for those in power
Post-Colonial Theory
Similar to Marxist theories, pc focuses on crimes of the state
For example, the state against Indigenous People
What this can look like:
State violence against Indigenous people and communities
Poor living conditions on reserves
MMIWG (Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls)
Queer Criminology
Focuses on queer perspectives
Things like the ignoring of the AIDS epidemic was an act of violence against the queer community
Specifically relevant to sexual and gender-based violence, sex work, and experiences within the legal system
How do we theorize same-sex intimate partner violence?
5 categories of neutralization (Sykes and Matza)
Denial of injury
Denial of responsibility
Denial of the victim
Condemning the condemners
Appeal to higher loyalties
Sexualization thesis
The notions that when the justice system deals with women, they do so based on gender-related criteria
Their amounts of perceived femininity can work for or against them
This idea of the perfect victim is wayyyy more specific with women as there are more standards to be considered “perfect”
Biological reductionism
Instances where female experiences are reduced to biology as opposed to society
Critique
Conservative backlash can stifle this theories ability to be applied
not intersectional
Right-Wing Libertarianism vs. Traditional Conservatism
Libertarian | Conservative | |
Political Leaning | Right | Right |
Views offenders as… | Rational, responsible for their actions | Evil and immoral |
Role of the state | Hands off | Paternalistic |
Core Value | Individual free-will | Traditional morals and respect for authority |
Libertarianism
Libertarians can be left-wing
Some socialist views/practices
Libertarian views are very pro-capitalism which is why it’s typically a right wing view
Republican Theory
Focus on restorative justice
A critique of authoritative populism
Reintegrative shaming:
theory says we need to emphasize positive ways to react to offenders, as punitive reactions only lead to negative social consequences
Negative Liberty
the objective of avoiding interference by the state
Promoted the free market
Wanted to remove government constraints
Retributivism:
claim treatment and rehabilitation did not work and were often unjust/wrongfully applied
Big on just desserts
Critical of utilitarianism
Belief in reintegration
Communitarianism:
interdependency at a societal level involving loyalty and trust
3 propositions of restorative justice
Crime is fundamentally a violation of people and interpersonal relationships
The victims and community have been harmed and are in need of restoration, and hence they should be directly involved in the justice process
Violations create obligations and liabilities
Offenders are obliged to make things as right as possible
The community is also obliged
Restorative justice seeks to heal and put right in the wrong
Restitution
Justice process must maximize the opportunities for participation and exchange of information between victim and offender
Critique of republican theory/restorative justice
Doesn’t look at causes of crime
Society of rich and poor offers different possibilities to be solely responsible for oneself and ones situation
In practice, not all people can get on board with this
Whats the difference between reintegrative shaming and stigmatizaion? How does labelling theory come into play?
Internet of things
he ever-present internet connectivity between people
The digital world allows room for Mutual surveillance where in which people can have more information than ever before
Cybercrime (and two types)
A form of crime that generally involves the theft or destruction of information using computers, networks, and the internet
There are two types of cybercrime: Technology as an instrument and Technology as a Target
Instrument
Money laundering, cyberbullying, identity theft
Target
malware and hacking
Cyber trespass:
his includes unauthorized access to a computer system Network or data source and includes issues surrounding malware or malicious software
Cyber theft/deception
includes Financial theft and data theft as well as intellectual property thefts these are typically fraud scams, identity fraud and malware
Cyber violence
includes the various ways that individuals can cause harm to others including stalking, cyberbullying, harassment, or threats of terror
Cybercrime critique
There's really no one theory you can apply to all of cybercrime