Principles, Models, and Ethics of Assistive Technology

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/41

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

42 Terms

1
New cards

Assistive technology Act of 1998 definiteion

any item, piece of equipment or product system whether acquired commercially off the shelf, modified, or customized that is used to increase, maintain or improve functional capabilities of individuals with disabilities

2
New cards

Assistive technology WHO definition

any product, instrument, equipment, or technology adapted or specifically designed for improving functioning of a disabled person

3
New cards

Examples of AT

  • mobility devices

  • positioning devices

  • communication aides

  • electronic aids to daily living

  • low-tech activity specific devices

  • sensory tech

  • cognitive aids

  • prosthetics/orthotics

4
New cards

AT looks to ____ the disabling influence of many environments

reduce

5
New cards

____ occurs at the intersection of the person and the context in which they live

disability

6
New cards

AT service delivery principles

  • process is person-centered not AT centered

  • Outcome is enablement of participation in desired activities

    • services are provided in a sustainable manner

7
New cards

AT service delivery team

  • OT

  • setting dependent

  • Polgar and Cook approaches AT from a generalist POV

8
New cards

Technology that is developed without the input of consumers is ____ likely to be adopted for its intended use

less

9
New cards

Evidence informed process

  1. includes steps to identify tech that is most appropriate for the user

  2. provides necessary training and support for initial and ongoing use of the technology

  3. adequately evaluate the outcome of the tech

  4. funders typically require evidence that supports specific outcomes of at use before purchasing

10
New cards

Sustainability

  • providing AT products and services in a manner that ensures people who need them have access in a timely and continuing manner

  • can involve development and establishment of AT services

  • providing tech that can be maintained and repaired using local knowledge, tech, and materials

11
New cards

technologies are becoming more _____

pervasive

12
New cards

distribution of AT is often through ____

funding

13
New cards

what becomes a concern with AT?

privacy

14
New cards

ethical process of principles including beneficence and nonmaleficence

  • AT’s purpose to benefit the consumer

    • AT must not harm the consumer

15
New cards

ethical process of principles including social justice

  • accessibility of AT services for all who require it

  • 1/10 people have access to the AT they need for everyday activities (WHO)

  • Lack of access to AT keeps some people with disabilities in poverty

16
New cards

ethical process of principles including distributive justice

  • inequities occur at the intersection of the person with a disability and the context in which he or she lives

  • advocates for an equitable distribution of resources

17
New cards

autonomy

right to self-determination and freedom from unnecessary constraints, interference, or loss of privacy

18
New cards

Use of AT can imply weakness or less ability however AT that is based on mainstream technologies can decrease the _____

stigma

19
New cards

Abandonment or discontinuance of AT is sometimes due to _____

stigma

20
New cards

The Human Activity Assistive Technology (HAAT) Model

  • Cook and Hussey, 1995

  • Describes someone (human) doing something (activity) in a context using AT

  • Emphasis of the model is on the person engaged in an activity within chosen environments

21
New cards

HAAT activity component

  • self care, work, volunteer, education, leisure

  • person may engage in multiple activities concurrently

  • engagement in activity is dynamic

  • assists in understanding of tasks in which the user of AT participates

  • what does the user do with AT?

  • Does the activity involve other people?

22
New cards

HAAT human component

  • includes user’s abilities in motor, sensory, cognitive, and affective areas

  • initial and ongoing assessments of these abilities

  • Is change in ability expected to occur?

  • Roles and experience with technology need to be considered

23
New cards

HAAT context component

  • context is used in contrast to environment

    • physical context

    • social context

    • cultural context

    • institutional context

24
New cards

complexity of AT

  • low-tech

  • mid-tech

  • high-tech

25
New cards

HAAT AT component

  • enabler for a human doing an activity in context

    • human/technology interface

    • processor

    • environmental interface

    • activity output

26
New cards

low tech AT

  • simple

  • low maintenance

  • limited/no electronics

27
New cards

mid tech AT

  • some maintenance

  • some training

  • more electronics

28
New cards

high tech

  • complex electronics

  • more training

  • more maintenance

29
New cards

examples of low/no tech AT

  • pencil grip

  • adapted books

  • slant board

  • color coding

  • read to out loud

  • note taker

  • picture schedule

30
New cards

examples of mid-tech AT

  • word prediction

  • text to speech

  • speech to text

  • spell checkers

  • adapted toys

  • organizers

  • e-books

31
New cards

examples of high-tech AT

  • computers/laptops

  • smartpens

  • smartphone

  • apps over $100

  • joystick access

32
New cards

hard technology

  • refers to tangible device

  • computer hardware, AAC device, hearing aid, mobility device

33
New cards

soft technology

  • less tangible aspects that support the use of a device

  • includes other people written or auditory material

34
New cards

how to apply HAAT model to AT

  • product and research development

  • product usability studies

  • client assessment

  • outcome evaluation

35
New cards

preparatory studies should be done prior to _____ design

product

36
New cards

_____ _____ of individuals with disabilities are critical parts of AT research and development process

lived experiences

37
New cards

usability

how well the user is able to access the device’s functionality

38
New cards

key features of usability

  • learnability

  • efficiency

  • memorability

  • errors

  • satisfaction

  • ease of use

39
New cards

Clinical assessment in AT

  1. identification of need to be addressed by AT use

  2. assessment of key aspects

  3. synthesis of assessment results

  4. device recommendation

  5. formal and informal assessments

  6. may include procurement of funding

40
New cards

OTs use AT as an intervention to

improve client’s performance, enable participation, maintain their meaningful engagement in occupation

41
New cards

OT scope of practice within AT

  • evaluating AT needs

  • developing and implementing intervention plans that incorporate AT to support occupational performance

  • training clients, caregivers, and team members on use of AT

  • coordinating services and resources for teams

  • advocating reimbursement and funding for AT devices and services

  • engaging in outcome measurement and scholarly work that builds evidence for the use of AT in OT services

42
New cards

what does intervention look like with AT?

the OT designs, fabricates, applies, modifies, and provides training with various forms of AT and tools as part of the intervention process to promote participation in occupation and enable access