UTILITY

0.0(0)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Get a hint
Hint

Test Utility

Get a hint
Hint

The usefulness of a psychological test in aiding decision-making and improving outcomes.

Get a hint
Hint

Comparative Utility

Get a hint
Hint

Evaluating how useful one test is compared to another in a specific context.

Card Sorting

1/20

Anonymous user
Anonymous user
flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Summarize ulit

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

21 Terms

1
New cards

Test Utility

The usefulness of a psychological test in aiding decision-making and improving outcomes.

2
New cards

Comparative Utility

Evaluating how useful one test is compared to another in a specific context.

3
New cards

Clinical Utility

How useful a test is for diagnosing or assessing clinical conditions.

application: Selecting appropriate assessments for diagnosing mental health conditions.

situation: Using the MMPI to diagnose personality disorders in a psychiatric clinic.

4
New cards

Diagnostic Utility

The ability of a test to classify individuals into categories (e.g., presence or absence of a condition).

application: Using screening tests to identify individuals with specific mental health issues.

situation: Applying the Beck Depression Inventory to identify symptoms of clinical depression.

5
New cards

Psychometric Soundness

The degree to which a test is reliable and valid for its intended use.

6
New cards

Costs

The financial and resource-related expenses associated with administering a test.

7
New cards

Benefits

The advantages or gains from using a test, including better decisions and improved outcomes.

application: Assessing whether a test reduces errors in candidate selection or increases productivity.

situation: Evaluating how a new cognitive assessment improves student placement accuracy.

8
New cards

Utility Analysis

A cost-benefit analysis technique used to evaluate the practical value of an assessment.

application: Used to determine whether adopting a new test is financially and practically worthwhile.

situation: Conducting a utility analysis to compare the efficacy of two intervention programs.

9
New cards

Expectancy Data

Information showing the likelihood that a test-taker will achieve a specific outcome.

application: Predicts how well individuals will perform based on their assessment scores.

10
New cards

Brogden Cronbach-Gleser Formula

A statistical method to estimate the utility of a test by calculating productivity gains.

application: Used in personnel selection to predict the economic impact of hiring decisions.

11
New cards

Cutoff Scores

Reference points that classify individuals into categories based on their test performance.

application: Applied to pass/fail decisions in academic testing and clinical diagnosis.

situation: Setting a cutoff score of 70% on a knowledge test to certify professionals.

12
New cards

Relative Cut Score

A cutoff score based on norm-related considerations (how a test-taker performs relative to others).

application: Used in competitive selection processes where only top performers are accepted.

situation: Admitting the top 10% of candidates based on their exam scores.

13
New cards

Fixed Cut Score

A predetermined score that defines minimum competency or proficiency.

application: Applied in licensing exams where a specific score is required to pass.

situation: Requiring a score of 75% to pass a clinical psychology licensing exam.

14
New cards

Multiple Cut Scores

Using two or more cut scores for classifying test takers into multiple categories.

application: Applied in tiered classification systems like academic grading or job suitability.

situation: Categorizing job applicants into “highly qualified,” “qualified,” and “not qualified.”

15
New cards

Multiple Hurdle Model

A selection method where applicants must pass several independent criteria to qualify.

application: Used in high-stakes job recruitment where multiple competencies must be verified.

16
New cards

Compensatory Model

where high performance on one criterion can offset low performance on another.

application: Applied when overall potential is more important than individual weaknesses.

17
New cards

Angoff Method

where experts estimate how minimally competent individuals would perform on each test item.

application: Used to set pass/fail thresholds in professional certification exams.

situation: Setting a passing score for the bar exam through expert judgment.

18
New cards

Known Groups Method

Establishes cut scores by comparing test performance between groups known to differ on the trait of interest.

application: Applied when validating new diagnostic tools or assessments.

situation: Differentiating between depressed and non depressed patients using a depression scale.

19
New cards

IRT-Based Method

Sets cut scores using item response theory, considering item difficulty and discrimination.

application: Applied in adaptive testing and complex performance assessments.

situation: Setting difficulty-based cut scores in computerized adaptive GRE testing.

20
New cards

Thorndike’s Predictive Yield

A norm-referenced method for setting cut scores to maximize correct classifications.

application: Applied when optimizing classification accuracy in educational and occupational testing.

21
New cards

Discriminant Analysis

A statistical technique to determine which variables best distinguish between predefined groups.

application: Applied to classify individuals based on psychological or performance data.

situation: Identifying personality traits that distinguish successful and unsuccessful employees.