Via negativa (the apophatic way)

studied byStudied by 17 people
5.0(1)
Get a hint
Hint

Why can language not be used to describe God?

1 / 25

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Philosophy

26 Terms

1

Why can language not be used to describe God?

It is inadequate to capture a transcendent, non material God =

New cards
2

How does the Via Negativa allow you to talk about God?

By saying what God is not

New cards
3

Who were the first people to point out the inability to know the essence of God?

  1. basil the great

  2. Gregory of Nyssa

New cards
4

What analogy did basil the great and Gregory of Nyssa use to demonstrate human inability to understand God ?

Then if humans cannot understand the essence and mind of ant with presumably limited skills we have no chance of understanding God.

New cards
5

What does Evagrius Ponticus say the highest understanding is?

“Pure prayer”- a union with God without words or images

New cards
6

Who made the distinction between the cataphatic way and the apophatic way?

pseudo Dionysius

New cards
7

What type of knowledge is calling god “ the good” etc for supporters of the via negativa ?

Provincial knowledge

New cards
8

What does the via negativa aim to move beyond?

Language all together

New cards
9

What lies behind any concept?

“The divine darkness”

New cards
10

Who was a strong supporter of the via negativa?

John Scotus Eriugena

New cards
11

What does John Soctus Eriugena say about Gods lightness?

“His light is called darkness because of its excellence”

New cards
12

Who adopted the via negativa?

Moses Maimodes

New cards
13

What does anthropomorphise mean?

To treat something inappropriately as human

New cards
14

What does maimodes warn the dangers of ?

Anthropomorphising God

New cards
15

Why is the understanding gained by the Via Negativa criticised?

It is seen as negligible and doesn’t give us a deep insight into the nature of God

New cards
16

Why was W.R inge concerned with the effects of the apophatic way?

that to deny God his description was to lead to “annihilation” of God and humanity

New cards
17

What does stripping God of his description lead to?

Losing the essential link between God and the world

New cards
18

What is the “divination of matter”

finding God through our material existence is part of his divine plan of salvation

New cards
19

What is speaking of God also like speaking of?

Love- we understand it yet cannot fully express it

New cards
20

Which Christian thinkers spoke about the “divinisation of matter”

G.K Chesterton and Pierre Teilhard

New cards
21

Why does the bible undermine the Via Negativa ?

The bible describes God in positive terms

New cards
22

What is an example of God being referred to positively in the bible?

“God is Love”

New cards
23

How does maimodes respond to the fact that God is spoken about in positive terms in the bible and why is this a weak argument ?

Maimodes- Bible written in limited human understanding and therefore needs interpreting

HOWEVER: Bible gives no indication that this is the case

New cards
24

What do some call the Via Negativa approach ?

Pessimistic- leaves humanity with an inability to to understand or say anything about God

New cards
25

How can you argue against the fact that the Via negativa is pessimistic?

Maimodes says that we can still gain “unity” with God once we abandon attempts to understand God with our limited reason

New cards
26

What does the Via Negativa prevent God from being?

a super imagine able being

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 2220 people
... ago
4.7(3)
note Note
studied byStudied by 24 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 42 people
... ago
5.0(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 48 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 452 people
... ago
5.0(3)
note Note
studied byStudied by 43 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 19 people
... ago
4.5(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 23406 people
... ago
4.5(119)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard (41)
studied byStudied by 2 people
... ago
4.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (26)
studied byStudied by 173 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (48)
studied byStudied by 21 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (41)
studied byStudied by 2 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (47)
studied byStudied by 1 person
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (22)
studied byStudied by 2 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (20)
studied byStudied by 1 person
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (22)
studied byStudied by 3 people
... ago
5.0(1)
robot