Via negativa (the apophatic way)

5.0(1)
studied byStudied by 17 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/25

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Philosophy

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

26 Terms

1
New cards
Why can language not be used to describe God?
It is inadequate to capture a transcendent, non material God =
2
New cards
How does the Via Negativa allow you to talk about God?
By saying what God is not
3
New cards
Who were the first people to point out the inability to know the essence of God?

1. basil the great
2. Gregory of Nyssa
4
New cards
What analogy did basil the great and Gregory of Nyssa use to demonstrate human inability to understand God ?
Then if humans cannot understand the essence and mind of ant with presumably limited skills we have no chance of understanding God.
5
New cards
What does Evagrius Ponticus say the highest understanding is?
“Pure prayer”- a union with God without words or images
6
New cards
Who made the distinction between the cataphatic way and the apophatic way?
pseudo Dionysius
7
New cards
What type of knowledge is calling god “ the good” etc for supporters of the via negativa ?
Provincial knowledge
8
New cards
What does the via negativa aim to move beyond?
Language all together
9
New cards
What lies behind any concept?
“The divine darkness”
10
New cards
Who was a strong supporter of the via negativa?
John Scotus Eriugena
11
New cards
What does John Soctus Eriugena say about Gods lightness?
“His light is called darkness because of its excellence”
12
New cards
Who adopted the via negativa?
Moses Maimodes
13
New cards
What does anthropomorphise mean?
To treat something inappropriately as human
14
New cards
What does maimodes warn the dangers of ?
Anthropomorphising God
15
New cards
Why is the understanding gained by the Via Negativa criticised?
It is seen as negligible and doesn’t give us a deep insight into the nature of God
16
New cards
Why was W.R inge concerned with the effects of the apophatic way?
that to deny God his description was to lead to “annihilation” of God and humanity
17
New cards
What does stripping God of his description lead to?
Losing the essential link between God and the world
18
New cards
What is the “divination of matter”
finding God through our material existence is part of his divine plan of salvation
19
New cards
What is speaking of God also like speaking of?
Love- we understand it yet cannot fully express it
20
New cards
Which Christian thinkers spoke about the “divinisation of matter”
G.K Chesterton and Pierre Teilhard
21
New cards
Why does the bible undermine the Via Negativa ?
The bible describes God in positive terms
22
New cards
What is an example of God being referred to positively in the bible?
“God is Love”
23
New cards
How does maimodes respond to the fact that God is spoken about in positive terms in the bible and why is this a weak argument ?
Maimodes- Bible written in limited human understanding and therefore needs interpreting

HOWEVER: Bible gives no indication that this is the case
24
New cards
What do some call the Via Negativa approach ?
Pessimistic- leaves humanity with an inability to to understand or say anything about God
25
New cards
How can you argue against the fact that the Via negativa is pessimistic?
Maimodes says that we can still gain “unity” with God once we abandon attempts to understand God with our limited reason
26
New cards
What does the Via Negativa prevent God from being?
a super imagine able being