1/53
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
UN Emergency Force (UNEF) (2)
In 1956, to facilitate disengagement of British, French, + Israeli troops from Egypt following the Suez Crisis, a multilateral armed force dispatched to help keep peace until a pol settlement could be reached
Egypt requests UNEF withdrawal in May 1967 → possibly to attack Israel, then Israel attacked with the 6-day war
United Nations (4)
Created in June 1945
Original membership 51 states (now 193) - pro-western orientation has disappeared
Primary mandate, as espoused in UN Charter, is maintaining int peace + security
Security Council pre-eminent organ responsible for maintaining int order
How maintain int peace + security
All refrain in their int relations from threat or use of force against territorial integrity or pol independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with Purposes of the UN
Boundaries to the prohibition of the use of force (5)
Prohibition against the use of force does not cover all situations
Sovereign states can use force within their territory
Some theorists believe state may be able to use force outside its territory, e.g. force used for humanitarian purposes / protect citizens of intervening state who are living abroad
However, UN Charter does not acknowledge these situations as exceptions to prohibition against the use of force
R2P is not included
Self-defense (4)
Self-defense must be necessary + proportionate to aggression
When a state faces an imminent attack, it may have right to act in anticipatory self-defense
Article 51 + other provisions of the UN Charter do not address this situation
However, customary int law recognizes right of anticipatory self-defense when armed attack is imminent + inevitable - BUT how to know it is anticipatory (e.g. Israel launching attack ag Egypt after withdrawal from UNEF)
UN Security Council (4)
5 permanent members (P5) w/ veto rights
Until 1965 six rotating members
After 1965 ten rotating members
For a resolution to pass, at least 9 votes for and no P5 votes against
Security Council Powers (5)
Chapter VI (Pacific Settlement of Disputes)
Chapter VII (Action w Respect to Threats to Peace, Breaches of Peace, + Acts of Aggression)
Chapter VIII (Regional Arrangements)
Peacekeeping originally called “Chapter VI + a half” operations
Not explicitly mentioned in UN Charter
Chapter VI (Pacific Settlement of Disputes)
Sec Council authorized to call disputing parties to resolve their conflict through peaceful means such as fact-finding, good offices, negotiation, arbitration + judicial settlement
Chapter VII (Action w Respect to Threats to Peace, Breaches of Peace, + Acts of Aggression) (2)
Grants Council coercive authority – can compel compliance w decisions binding on member states → e.g. granting Africa Union coercive action
It may impose diplomatic + econ sanctions + authorize mili force
Chapter VIII (Regional Arrangements) (2)
Encourages regional org to engage in peaceful dispute settlement + requires Council’s authorization before taking coercive action
Grants Council power to delegate enforcement to regional bodies
Use of force Chapter VII
Sec Council … “may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain/ restore int peace + security - incl demonstrations, blockade, and other operations by air, sea, or land forces of Members of UN
Allows peacekeeping operations
What are peace keeping operations (4)
Range from small observation + monitoring missions to peacebuilding in conflict-afflicted societies
Og role of peacekeepers was to serve as buffer forces + observers - just keep two forces apart
Usually small-scale under Chapter VI
Some exceptions occur under Chapter VII: e.g. use of force authorized in Korean War, 20k strong peacekeeping force in Congo/Katanga
United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO) (3)
First peacekeeping mission created in 1948 to monitor ceasefires after first Arab-Israeli war
Unarmed mili observers
Still monitors ceasefire agreements in Lebanon, Golan Heights, Sinai
Peacekeeping 5 Principles
UN-mandated missions
Consent of parties to the mission
Impartiality (not aligned to either part of conflict)
Voluntary troop contributions
Minimum use of force - only in self-defense unless authorized
Cold War Peacekeeping (7)
UN Emergency Force (Sinai)
UN Observation Group in Lebanon
UN Operation in Congo
UN Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus
UN India-Pakistan Observation Mission
UN Interim Force in Lebanon
Small-scale except Congo + most peaceful
UN in Post-Cold War (5)
UN invokes Chapter VII authorizing mili force (US-led coalition) to remove Iraqi troops from Kuwait
UNPROFOR in Bosnia is UN’s largest peacekeeping mission
New missions in Afghanistan, Cambodia, Angola, Namibia, El Salvador + Nicaragua – then to Bosnia, Somalia, Rwanda, Kosovo, Haiti, Democratic Republic of Congo, etc.
Shift from peacekeeping to peace enforcement
Second gen peacekeeping incl electoral assistance, HR monitoring
Peacekeepign evolutions (4)
UN Sec-General Boutros-Ghali in 1992 called for establishment of “peace-enforcement units” to deal w challenges that exceed peacekeeping, but such units never been created
National + multinational forces, such as NATO, have sometimes been called instead to assist UN peacekeeping operations w enforcement
By 2010, nearly 100,000 uniformed personnel in the field (up from 14,000 in 1998),UN was 2nd only to US in N of deployed armed forces under its command
N peacekeeping operations undertaken by regional org doubled between 1995-2005. The African Union (AU), Econ Community of West African States (ECOWAS), EU, NATO, + Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) all launched major peacekeeping operations of their own in that period
Peacemaking (3)
Measures to address conflicts in progress + usually involves diplomatic action to bring hostile parties to a negotiated settlement
Involves negotiation, mediation, + demo decision-making processes
Unlike peacekeeping, peacemaking uses mutual dialogue to agreement ab how solve immediate problem so removing parties’ incentives to use violence
Peacekeeping defintion
Deployment of national or multinational (+c common) forces for purpose of helping to control + resolve an actual or potential armed conflict between or within states
Peacekeeping (5)
Most undertaken w authorization of + often led by, UN but regional org may also conduct peacekeeping operations + in some cases single states have undertaken such operations as well
Peacekeeping forces normally deployed w consent of parties to a conflict + in support of a ceasefire
Peacekeeping forces usually unarmed / only lightly armed + use min of force necessary
Involves efforts to stop / limit harmful symptoms of escalated conflict—direct violence (such as abuse/ attack) or potential violence—+ establish sufficient safety to enable efforts toward preventing further violence
Does not right wrongs or address conflicts causing violence
Peace enforcement (2)
Refers to use of mili assets to enforce a peace against will of parties to a conflict when, for instance, ceasefire has failed
Peace enforcement often exceeds capacity of peacekeeping forces + is better executed by more heavily armed forces
Peacebuilding (2)
Measures targeted to reduce risk of relapsing into conflict by strengthening national capacities for conflict management + to lay foundation for sustainable peace + development
Transformation of social rels - repairing systemic factors that were causing + exacerbating harmful conflict
Econ sanctions and Int Criminal Prosecution (3)
In addition to mili force, Security Council also uses non-military coercion
Sanctions on Iraq, al-Aqaeda + ISIS
Criminal tribunals – esp. former Yugoslavia + Rwanda
Peacekeeping origins (3)
League of Nations brought in to resolve territorial dispute between Colombia + Peru, 1933-34
League appointed 3 member nations (Guatemala, Ireland + Spain) as a ‘Commission for Administration of the Territory of Leticia’
Each side’s mili forces were withdrawn + an int force of Colombian troops under Commission’s supervision policed disputed area
League of Nations peacekeeping forces (3)
Territories of Saar basin, formerly part of Germany, placed under administration of LON for period of 15 years
At end of 15 years, a plebiscite was to be held to determine final status of Saar
An int police force, composed of soldiers from Britain, NL, Italy, + Sweden, was deployed to maintain order on day of plebiscite
Covenant of the League of Nations (3)
Article 10 = In case of aggression or in case of threat or danger of aggression Council shall advise upon means by which this obligation shall be fulfilled.
Article 16 = undertake immediately to subject it to severance of all trade or financial rels, prohibition of all intercourse between their nationals + nationals of covenant-breaking State + prevention of all financial, commercial or personal intercourse
Article 16 = recommend what effective mili, naval or air force Members of League shall severally contribute to armed forces to be used to protect covenants of the League.
Weakness of the League of Nation Covenant (4)
Intended to prevent states from going to war, final sanction was threat of force
Ultimate authority rested on mobilization of world opinion
Belief that threat of econ sanctions, alone, would be sufficient to deter states from aggression
Article 16 reflected experience of WWI when blockade weapon had been used to good effect
League of Nations end (5)
League acted as arbitrator in disputes + established commissions to investigate problems
Where aggression found, sanctions could follow
2 events that led to its end
Japanese 1931 seizure Manchuria
Abyssinia (Ethiopia)
Japanese 1931 seizure Manchuria (4)
Japanese 1931 seizure of Manchuria sanctions were not used
Special Assembly voted Japan should withdraw from Manchuria.
When Japanese refused + left the LON, League responded by reprimanding Japan
The floodgates open … - letting it get away with it what it means for everyone else
Abyssinia (Ethiopia) (5)
1935 Italian invasion, limited sanctions imposed
Not applied by all member nations + did not incl some key products such as oil
League made no attempt to limit Italy’s ability to wage war, such as closing Suez Canal to Italian shipping - esp due to powers like UK + France wanting friendly rels
Sanctions dropped following Italian conquest of Abyssinia in 1936
Leads to widespread belief that LON unwilling or unable to use collective force to prevent conflicts
Winning the war on war (4)
Controversial book describes decline of war, effectiveness of peacekeeping, + causal connection between them
According to Goldstein, the UN:
“lies at heart of war on war”
Is “central thread” in reducing levels of violence in conflict-ridden countries + keeping peace in many postwar societies
UN Peacekeeping and the Decline of War (2)
There is no question that UN played an important role in helping to shut down some deadly conflicts over past six decades
BUT … - Arguments against
UN Peacekeeping and the Decline of War - Arguments against (5)
UN deals w consequences of war, not onset of war
Hard for peacekeeping to explain long-term downward trend in war given its relatively recent invention
Peacekeeping has been shown to be effective at preventing resumption of specific wars, its effects on overall level of war in world not clear
Consent of parties means peacekeeping "works" when it is not needed + “fails” when it is needed most
Availability of peacekeeping to maintain peace once achieved probably allows some wars to end that would otherwise last longer
Is peacekeeping counterproductive (2)
Wars that end w clear victory lead to more stable peace than inconclusive wars
Peacekeeping by allowing wars to end sooner, but less decisively, may leave issues that would otherwise be resolved, eventually leading to repeated fighting that would otherwise not occur
Did the UN promote peace during the Cold War? (3)
Did not have a significant effect on rels between superpowers
Virtually powerless when it tried to push policy that one of superpowers opposed
Serve as a convenient forum for seeking int legitimacy, 3d party mediation + dealing w issues superpowers were mainly indifferent to or had common interest in resolving
UN after the Cold War (5)
Some successes but many failures …
NATO did not initially (then yes) have UN support in 1999 when it went to war w Serbia over Kosovo
When US could not get UN's permission to invade Iraq in 2003, it simply ignored UN
After Hussein overthrown, UN becomes involved in post-war reconstruction (UNSCR 1483)
UN unable to check Russian aggression against Ukraine in 2014/2022
Right to Protect (R2P) (5)
Calls for initiating wars against countries that commit serious crimes against own civilian pop
Goes beyond peacekeeping + can only be implemented under UN
If major powers get serious about this doctrine, there should surely be a significant inc in N of wars fought in future
However, R2P not likely to gain much traction, simply because it will be diff to get Sec Council to sanction R2P operations
Occurred w Chinese + Russian opposition to intervention in Syria
Key failures of UN Post Cold War (3)
Srebrenica
Rwanda genocide
→ reinforced need of org like NATO w heavy mili power to deal w these(
Srebrenica (6)
Town designated a safe area by UN + protected by Dutch peacekeepers
Dutch forces were under supplied/equipped + its superiors at UN unwilling to give it + support
1995, Dutch forces confronted by advancing Bosnia Serb
Massacre of 8,000 Bosnian Muslim men + boys by Bosnian Serb forces
Ethnic cleansing of 20k civilians
Worst instance of mass murder since WWII
2014 Dutch court found Dutch gov liable for deaths of more than 300 Bosnian Muslims
Rwanda (5)
UN Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR) created in 1993 w mandate to oversee peace agreement ending civil war
Following renewal of violence in 1994, UN reduces mili presence
Onset of genocide, Commander Dallaire requests reinforcements but unsuccessful
Limited forces to protect as many civilians as possible
Reinforcements arrive in June but after 800,000 Tutsis killed
Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA) (4)
Launched July 2013
Authorized size of 11,200 mili personnel + 1,440 police officers
June 2023: mili junta in Mali request withdrawal of UN mission (MINUSMA)
MINUSMA + MONUSCO represent 1/3 of all deployed UN peacekeeping personnel
Rise + Fall Peace missions (10)
Until 2016 N UN operations inc 117k personnel deployed 16 oper
After it begins to fall (now 11 peacekeeping missions)
Operations in Liberia, Haiti and Darfur end
Budget cuts
Security Council gridlock
UN peacekeeping missions have steadily reduced in N + size
Only several remaining (Central African Republic, South Sudan/Abyei region, Western Sahara)
Coincides w request to end French mili mission + invitation to Wagner Group
Demo Republic Congo terminates UN mission (MONUSCO)
UN troops deployed in Congo for 2 decades
Peacekeeping demographics (2)
Early contributors mainly neutral countries (Ireland, Sweden, Yugoslavia, Austria) + others such as Canada
Global South now provides most uniformed personnel - most imp is Bangladesh, followed Nepal + India
UNSCR 1325 (3)
2000 UNSC acknowledged changing nature of warfare + women continue to be excluded from participation in peace processes.
Resolution esp addresses how women + girls disproportionally impacted by violent conflict + war + recognizes critical role that women can + already do play in peacebuilding efforts.
UNSCR 1325 affirms that peace + security efforts are more sustainable when women are = partners in prevention of violent conflict, delivery of relief + recovery efforts + in forging of lasting peace
Women in Peacekeeping (3)
Shift from all-male peacekeeping units to more female participation, incl all-female police units
Focus on protecting women in post-conflict societies
By 2020, 1/3 of peace operations personnel were women
Many sex scandals of rape + sexual abuse in peacekeeping
African-led Peacekeeping (5)
Inc shift from UN to African-led operations
Reflects decreased UN legitimacy + preference for regional peacekeepers
Occur under African Union (Somalia), ECOWAS (Liberia), + ad hoc coalitions (Multinational Joint Task Force in Lake Chad)
Since 2000, 38 African-led peace support operations
10 active operations as of 2023
Other peacekeeping entities (8)
NATO-led peacekeeping missions
Deployed to Bosnia (SFOR) + Kosovo (KFOR)
EUFOR (Operation Althea)
Replaces NATO SFOR in Bosnia
Russian peacekeepers
Deployed to maintain Nagorno-Karabakh ceasefire between Armenia + Azerbaijan
Neutral Nations Supervisory Commission - end Korean War
Int Commission of Control + Supervision - ad hoc for Vietnam
Elements of ceasefire deal in Ukraine (9)
Ceasefire agreement
Agree on ceasefire line
Creation of Joint Mili Coord Commission
Agreement on buffer zone + limitation zones for heavy weapons
Int monitoring + verification mission (incl European troops?)
Humanitarian demining
Humanitarian corridors
Security guarantees
Build on ceasefire to achieve pol settlement
Preconditions for ceasefire (6)
For Ukraine – legally binding security assurances?
Confidence-building measures/de-escalation
No attacks on port infra
No attacks on civilian ships in Black Sea
No attacks on other critical infra, e.g. energy installations
No targeting of Ukrainian airports
Ceasefire Line
Line of Contact/basis for a demili zone?
Demili zone implies a long-term de facto division of the country
Line Contact considered more of a transitional arrangement
Buffer zone or zone of separation
Approx 10-15 km wide would be absent of mili forces, heavy + light weapons, as well no-fly zone for UAVs – except those of int monitors
Wider buffer zone
50km for artillery of 100mm calibre or more
75km for multiple rocket launchers
150km for certain missile systems
Must be verifiable
Separate agreement needed for maritime security
International Monitoring + Verification (11)
Requires clear mandate + assumption of a ceasefire
Length ceasefire line prob 1200 km (5x length of Korean DMZ) – need to patrol 24/7
Probably an int mission rather than UN one
Core tasks incl monitor ceasefire and to verify withdrawal of troops + heavy weapons
Large force interposing itself between Russian/Ukrainian forces unlikely (50k troops)
Lighter force located on both sides of ceasefire line limited to monitoring + verification (15k troops)
Int force equipped w armored vehicles, helicopters, light aircraft, UAVs
Led by Force Commander reporting to UNSC
Composition of force agreed to by both sides?
If only civilian force, will either side have confidence in it?
Indefinite commitment
Composition of force agreed to by both sides? (4)
UN Force – blue berets?
Will Russia accept troops from NATO countries, incl. NATO minus USA?
Which countries are willing/able to send troops + viewed as impartial?
Global South?
Mili VS Civilian roles (7)
Military component
Monitor implementation of ceasefire/report violations
Verify withdrawal of heavy weapons
Support de-mining
Enable humanitarian corridors
Civilian component
Monitor/report on HR violations
Provide humanitarian assistance w focus on marginalized + vulnerable groups incl elderly, women, youth + children
Provide medical/psychological assistance to pop (e.g. helping w PTSD)
Security guarantee (9)
Ukraine will want guarantees it will receive mili (direct/indirect) + other support if Russia resumes aggression
What type of deterrent will be sufficient?
European troops stationed in Ukraine (tripwire force)
European troops stationed near Ukraine ready to intervene quickly?
European patrolled No Fly Zone?
More weapons – higher quality
New/renewed sanctions on Russia for ceasefire violations
What will Russia demand?
No NATO troops in Ukraine?