1/93
Epidemiology, Tuberculosis & HIV, Social Determinants of Health
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Epidemiology
The study of the distribution and determinants of health-related states in specified populations, and the application of this study to control health problems
Epidemiology Definition 2
The study of the distribution and determinants
Of health-related states
In specified populations
The application of this study to control health related problems
Epidemiology Distribution
Occurrence of cases by time, place, and person
Epidemiology Determinants
All the causes and risk factors for the occurrence of a disease, including physical, biological, social, cultural, and behavioral factors
Epidemiology Health Related States
Diagnosis of a specified disease or cause of death
Health-related behaviour (ex. smoking, prenatal vitamins)
Epidemiology Specified Population
A measurable group, defined by location, time, demographics, and other characteristics
Epidemiology Application
Analysis, conclusion, distribution, and timely use of epidemiologic information to protect the health of the population
Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion
Build healthy public policy - no-smoking rules in buildings
Create supportive environments - parks, exercise facilities
Strengthen community action - empower communities to make healthy decisions
Develop personal skills - life skills, coping
Reorient health system - from treatment to prevention/upstream factors
John Snow’s Experiments
Side of the Street experiment - which way the water flows affects who gets cholera
Broad street pump experiment - people drinking from the Broad Street Pump gets cholera
Mapped cases based on where people got their water from (identified the pump as source)
Grand experiment - source of water of everyone in London
Determines which company supplies the water based on sanity of the water
Compared cholera rates by the company
Descriptive Epidemiology
The occurrence of a disease by person, place, and time, answering "who, where, and when”
Analytic Epidemiology
Investigates the causes and risk factors by comparing groups, answering "why and how"
Person/Host Factors
What sets an individual apart from others in the context of contracting an infectious disease
Different types of host factors include:
Personal factors people are born with
Acquired host factors
Transitory host factors
Behaviours
Place/Environment
How does the prevalence of a disease vary from one place to another?
Range of factors distributed geographically:
Climate
Diet
Cultural Practices
Methods of food preparation and storage
Population density
Exposure to pollutants
Insects & bugs
Time
How are disease changed over time?
How are diseases cyclical? (recurring)
How are diseases seasonal?
Does the time of day matter?
Different agents
Factors that causes or contributes to a disease or health outcome
Nutritive agents
Chemical agents
Physical agents
Infectious agents
Triad of Distribution
Descriptive epidemiology
Includes:
Person/Host - who is affected (age, gender, occupation)
Place - where the disease occurs (geographical location)
Time - when it occurs (season, year, trend)
Triad of Causation
Analytic epidemiology
Includes:
Agents - the cause of a disease (bacteria, virus, chemical)
Host - the person or organism susceptible to the disease
Environment - external factors that allow the disease to occur or spread (climate, sanitation, social conditions)
Applications of Epidemiology
Identifying the cause of a new syndrome
Assessing risks of exposure
Determining whether treatment “x” is effective
Identifying heath service use and trends
Identifying practical convention strategies
The Epidemiologic Approach
Counts cases or health events, and describes them in terms of time, place, and person
Divides the number of cases by an appropriate denominator to calculate rates (morbidity and mortality)
Compares these rates over time (trends) or for different groups of people
Endemic
Cases are continually occurring in the population
Epidemic
Outbreak of a disease in a localized group of people
Spread by:
Vectors
Carriers
Sudden intro of new pathogen
Pandemic
Epidemics that have spread beyond their local region and are affecting people in various/all parts of the world
Global estimates for children (<15 years) in 2022
Children living with HIV - 1.5 million
New HIV infections - 130 000
Deaths due to AIDS - 84 000
Global estimates for adults and children in 2022
People living with HIV - 39.0 million
New HIV infections - 1.3 million
Deaths due to AIDS - 630 000
3600 new HIV infections (adults and children) a day in 2022
50% are in sub-Saharan Africa
360 are among children under 15 years old
3200 are among adults aged 15 years and older, of whom:
46% are women
30% are young people (15-24)
18% are young women (15-24)
People living with HIV accessing antiretroviral therapy
9.2 million people living with HIV did not have access to antiretroviral treatment in 2022
Number of children orphaned due to HIV living in sub-Saharan Africa in 2007
>10 million
Why is it hard to develop an HIV vaccine?
Virus is genetically diverse - has a rapid genetic mutation rate which makes HIV unique for everyone
Measures of Disease Occurance
Useful for:
Finding which diseases people suffer from
Determining the extent to which the disease causes death/disability
Carrying out disease surveillance
To perform these functions, it is important to use a consistent set of indicators in order to make comparisons
Prevalence
The proportion of individuals in a population with the disease at a given point in time
Must report the time period at which people are counted
Can be reported as proportion or percentage
Prevalence Formula
= # of existing cases/# of people in a population at given point in time
Point Prevalence vs. Period Prevalence
Point Prevalence - the proportion of individuals in a population with the disease at a given point in time (ex. on June 30, 2015)
Period Prevalence - the proportion of individuals in a population with the disease at any time during a specified time period (ex. during the year 2015)
Uses of Prevalence
Quantify the proportion of people with a disease (how many people are affected?)
Estimated the probability that an individual will have the disease during a point in time
Project heath care and other policy needs or issues
Estimate the costs associated with a particular disease
Cannot tell us:
Duration of disease
Cause of disease
Cumulative Incidence
Proportion of people who become diseased during a specific time period
Must report the time period of interest with a cumulative incidence
Reported as a proportion
Assume the entire population of interest is at risk at the beginning of the time period and should exclude…
People who already have the disease (cases)
People who cannot develop the disease (age, sex, immune, organ removed)
Cumulative Incidence Formula
= # of new cases/# of people in the population at risk of developing the disease at the beginning of the period
Uses of Cumulative Incidence
Estimate the probability (average risk) that a person will develop the disease during a specific time period
Research on causes, prevention, and treatment of diseases
Incidence Rate
Measure of the rate of development of a disease in a population
Rates can go up or down
Denominator represents window of time people are at risk of disease - not number of people at risk at the beginning
reported in units of time per 1000 person years
Incidence Rate Formula
= # of new cases/# of person time when people were at risk of developing the disease
Uses of Incidence Rates
Research on causes, prevention, and treatment of disease
Attack Rate
The proportion of a population that becomes ill with a disease during a specific time period
Crude Mortality Rate
Overall incidence of death in a population
all cause mortality - deaths from all causes
disease specific mortality - deaths from specific disease
Crude Mortality Rate Formula
= number of deaths/average population during year x 10^5
Standardized Mortality Rates
Age-standardized rate: a procedure where weighted averages of age-specific rates are used to modify rates to a standard population in order to minimize the effects of differences in age composition of different populations
Standardized Mortality Rates - The How…
To use DIRECT standardization, you need to have:
Age-specific disease/death rates in a population of interest
Age distribution of a standard population
Steps:
Calculate morality rate for each age group in population
Multiply age specific rate X standard population
Add up total expected deaths in a standard population
Expected deaths/standard population
Standardized Incidence/Morality Ratios
Compares the observed number of deaths in a population to the number of deaths that would be expected if the population had the same age-specific death rates as a standard population
Standardized incidence/Mortality Ratios Formula
= Observed # of cases (deaths)/# expected for standard
Proportional Mortality Ratio
Proportional Mortality Ratio: Compares the proportion of deaths with a standard population
Proportional Mortality Ratio Formula
= proportion of deaths from specific cause/proportion expected for standard population
Case Fatality Rate
Proportion of people with a given disease who will die from thay disease during a specific time period
Often used as a measure of the short term severity of acute disease
expressed per 100 cases (ex. %age)
Case Fatality Rate Formula
= # of deaths from disease in a specified time period/total number with disease
Infant Mortality Rate Formula
= # of deaths in children up to 1 year in specific year/# of births the same year
Usually expressed per 1000 births
Why do we use standardized mortality rates?
To account for differences in the age structure of populations
How do you establish causation?
Bradford Hill Criteria of Causality
Temporality - exposure/effect has to occur before the cause
Strength of Association - is there a strong connection between the variables
Consistency - association should be consistently observed in different studies, populations, and settings
Specificity - The exposure is associated with a specific outcome
Dose Response - level of duration and exposure
Absolute proof is not needed to justify action
Sufficient Cause
Factor (or more usually a combination of several factors) that will inevitably produce disease
Contribution of necessary and contribution causes that makes disease inevitable in an individual
Component Cause
Factor that contributes towards disease causation but is not sufficient to cause disease on it’s own
Needed in some cases
Necessary Cause
Any agent (or component cause) that is required for the development of given disease
Found in all cases
Odds Ratio
(A/C)/(B/D) = AD/BC
Used in control studies
What is the odds of exposure among cases and controls
OR> 1.0 positive, OR<1.0 protective factor
If OR = 2.0 odds of disease two times higher than among exposed
Absolute Risk & Relative Risk
If you are exposed to a risk factor, what is the risk you will get the disease (outcome)
A/A+B (outcome is exposed/all exposed)
C/C+D (outcome is unexposed/all unexposed)
CI is exposed/CI is unexposed
Observational Studies
Researcher does not intervene in any way;
Measurement of occurrence of disease or health outcome
Comparing patterns of exposure and disease outcomes
Identifying risk factors associated with health/disease
Both descriptive and analytical can fit here!
Experimental Studies
Investigator tries to change something and measure the effect on disease outcome - clinical trials, preventative trials
Descriptive Studies
Research that described the occurrence of disease and/or exposure
Explains what is happening by observing data
Remember: person, place, time
Ask: who, what, where, when?
Case Reports: Detailed descriptions usually by a doctor(s) identifying diseases that are unusual/interesting; may be related to unusual exposure
Routine data - mortality, life expectancy
Prevalence surveys
Migrant studies
Analytic Studies
Primary purpose is to evaluate the ASSOCIATION between an EXPOSURE or CHARACTERISTIC and the development of a particular disease
why and how it is happening by analyzing relationships between variables
Exposure
Includes:
Infectious Agents
Behaviours
Intrinsic Characteristic of Individuals
Social or Environmental Factors
Ecological Studies
Compares the prevalence of exposure and disease occurrence in populations
Observations collected/displayed at the group level may not apply at the individual level
Cross-Sectional Studies
Study group chosen to represent a subgroup of society/cross-section of the population
Case Control Study
Involves chosen individuals with disease or outcome of interest (cases) and a comparison group without the disease (controls)
Multiple ways of selecting the control group
Compares the odds of exposure
Prospective Cohort Studies
Follow-Up Studies: Follows people over time to see what happens
Compares the rates of occurrence of disease in people with or without a particular exposure
Important findings from Smyth ET.AL.
Current drinking associated with a reduced risk of MI (heart attack)
Current drinking associated with an increased risk of alcohol related cancers and injury
High alcohol intake associated with increased mortality
There are different associations between alcohol and these outcomes, depending on the level of income in the region
Example: Rationale & Research Question
Rationale: Cocoa consumption may improve CVD outcomes
Small Studies had documented improvements in:
Blood pressure
Endothelial function
Insulin sensitivity
Research Question: What about habitual consumption in a group of the population at high risk for heart disease
TB Infection vs. TB Disease
Begins with latent infection = exposure to TB bacillus (latent infection is asymptomatic)
Usually affects the lungs and respiratory tract; TB can affect other organ systems in the body
Pulmonary disease (primarily)
Extra-pulmonary disease
Systemic infection when lymphatic dissemination spreads TB bacilli throughout the body
Symptoms of Pulmonary Disease
Bad cough (>2 weeks)
Chest pain
Coughing up blood or sputum (phlegm)
Weakness or feeling tired
Weight loss
Loss of appetite
Chills
Fever
Night sweats
Koch, 1882
Discovered Tubercle bacilli
Group of five closely related mycobacteria
Slender, slightly curved rod-shaped bacteria
Slow growing; generation time (~24 hours)
High molecular weight of lipids in their cell walls
The Organism
Genetic mapping indicated that the bacteria is not a mutation of M.bovis
Million years ago in soil and water in Paleolithic period
Traces identified in Egyptian mummies from 3500-400 BC
Initial sporadic becoming endemic
AD100 in Mediterranean states and Europe
Increased incidence during Industrial Revolution
Established in North America by the early 1700s
Largely unknown in Africa at the beginning of 1900s spread with European colonization
Overarching findings of world TB report 2023
Major global recovery in the number of people being newly diagnosed with TB in 2022, after 2 years of COVID-related disruptions
This has started to reverse or moderate the damaging impact of the pandemic on the number of people dying from TB and falling ill with TB
BUT
In 2022, TB remained the second leading cause of death from an infectious disease after COVID-19
Global TB targets set for 2018-2022 at the first UN high-level meeting on TB were mostly missed and End TB Strategy targets are off track
TB Diagnostic Tests
TB skin test
Sputum smear microscopy
Xpert MTB/RIF
Accuracy of Testing
Measuring Accuracy - do the test results correspond to the true state of the phenomenon?
Sensitive Tests - ideal case; your tests will identity all people with disease (most people with disease identified)
Specific Tests - ideal case; your tests will identify only people with disease (most identified actually have disease)
Sensitivity
How well does the test classify people with disease as diseased?
Decreasing false negatives will increase proportion of true positives
Number with disease → A/(A+C)
Specificity
How well does the test classify people without disease as non-diseased?
Decreasing false positives will increase proportions of true negatives
Number without the disease → D/(B+D)
Increasing the sensitivity for TB tests
Why is this important to TB prevention? (decrease # of false negatives)
TB can spread to other people and they can die without treatment
Improving the specificity of TB tests
Why is this important for TB prevention? (decrease # of false positives)
Waste of resources
Stigma
Antibiotic resistance; won’t work effectively if they contract TB in the future
Factors that influence false positives
Non-tuberculosis mycobacteria (tropical/subtropical climates)
BCG vaccination
Received before 2 years of age - not likely to be the case
Received in childhood/adolescence - 15%-25% have positive reactions up to 20 years later
Factors that influence false negatives
Immuno-suppression: HIV patients - 20% with CD4>500 and 80%-100% with CD4<200
Malnutrition
Corticosteroid use
Concurrent viral illness
Recent TB infections (2-10 weeks for reaction)
Very young age (immune system not developed)
TB Skin Test
Errors in technique can lead to false positives and negatives
Canada - TB test positive if reaction > 10mm therefore further diagnostics
Anergy - non-responsiveness of immune system
Sputum Smear Microscopy
Test developed over 100 years ago
Being phased out in most countries
Still the most commonly used for of testing for TB
Xpert MTB/RIF
Rapid molecular test have been developed
Diagnosis within 100 minutes
Price of tests reportedly decreased in August 2012 from $16.86 USD to $9.98 USD
Xpert MTB/RIF Pros and Cons
Pros:
Better sensitivity and specificity than smear microscopy
Rapid - 2 hours
Operators don’t need laboratory training/biosafety equipment
Can test HIV viral load and test for resistant bacteria
Cons:
Expensive
Sophisticated hardware/computer facilities and computer training needed
Needs continuous electrical supply and conditioning
Cannot differentiate between live and dead M. tuberculosis
Why is treatment for TB difficult?
Duration of treatment
Asymptomatic early
Regimen of pills
DOTS
Directly Observed Treatment Short-course
$10 per patient/6-8 months; total treatment costs estimated $100-$1000 for non-drug resistant TB
Helps in the delivery of ARV treatment for people with HIV/AIDS
Decreases incidence/prevalence of TB
Important for reducing drug resistant TB
Prevention
Types of prevention:
Prevent new cases of infection
Prevent activation and reactivation of disease
Preventing transmission:
Suspected cases in respiratory isolation; ideally in hospital
Quasi-isolation at home (no work, school, indoor public places)
Non contact with people susceptible to TB
Compliance with therapy
BCG Vaccination
Part of standard vaccines in WHO Expanded Programme on Immunization; implemented in 100 countries
Administered at birth
Smallpox Eradication Challenges
Ring Vaccination
There wasn’t enough vaccines for everyone - a “ring” is created around a confirmed case and those who had close contact with the infected person were vaccinated
Difficulty reaching remote places
Polio Campaign Challenges
Had to vaccinate everyone under 5 years old
Disease wasn’t as visible in comparison to smallpox
Massive population
Vaccine was heat sensitive - had to be kept in low temperatures
Conflicts with religion
Podcast on Indigenous TB
Talks about the history of Indian hospitals
Mixed TB patients with general patients
Isolated/kept people for decades because they assumed they wouldn’t comply with treatment
Affects how Indigenous people today see the healthcare system - lack of compliance, mistrust, feat
Public health/upstream/downstream (prevention)
Public health approach - improving the health of the entire populations rather than just an individual
Responsibilities of the public health system - health emergencies, disease prevention, chronic diseases (protecting and promoting heath of the population)
Differences between public health and clinical medicine - focus on prevention and promoting health in populations vs. focus on diagnosis and treatment of disease in individual patients
Features of public health - preventing disease and injury; focuses on protecting the entire population rather than solely on individual treatment