1/30
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
right hemisphere syndrome (RHS)
collection of symptoms associated with right hemisphere damage (RHD)
extremely heterogeneous population in terms of severity
etiologies
any neurologic disorder
stroke
TBI
tumor
infectious process
damage in any part of right hemisphere
site of lesion
not very helpful to talk about with this population
very few clear patterns of localization of function in right hemisphere
onset
right and left hemisphere strokes occur at same frequency
most commonly used stroke assessment tools do not specifically assess right hemisphere → leads to underestimating severity of RH stroke
RH stroke may receive less appropriate medical care
symptoms
cognition and communication may be affected
expressive and receptive challenges
attention
memory
executive functioning
reading and writing
visual-perceptual impairment
auditory-perceptual impairment
no aphasia in RH damage
combined expressive and receptive challenges
lack of perspective regarding another person’s feelings or pov
deficits in pragmatics
challenges in humor
changes in affect
deficits in pragmatics
humor may change
hypo and hyper-affectivity
deficits in pragmatics
topic maintenance
codeswitching
inappropriate utterances
challenges with judging appropriateness of conversational content
poor eye contact
poor conversational turn-taking
failure to interpret non-verbal cues
problems noticing communication breakdown
failure to repair communication breakdown
changes in humor
may be related to disinhibition of inappropriate content and preference for more concrete over abstract content
hypoaffectivity
flat expression of emotion conveyed by reduced prosody and lack of conversational or social initiative
hyperaffectivity
exuberance and incessant talking
receptive challenges
difficulty stems from cognitive deficits (attention and memory)
tendency to literally interpret figurative language
difficulty with inferencing
do not struggle with lexical and grammatical processing very much
expressive challenges
difficulty with discourse coherence (tying content together)
deficits in the use of prosody
aprosodia
aprosodia
deficit in ability to
discriminate prosodic patterns that signal emotion, grammar, or pragmatics
manipulate prosodic patterns to convey emotion, grammar, or pragmatics
expressive and receptive aprosodia may co-occur or on their own
speech may be monotone and slow
attention
reduced alertness to environment
decreased sustained attention or vigilance
decreased selective attention
decreased alternating attention
visual neglect
anosognosia
anosognosia
lack of awareness of illness
memory
verbal
nonverbal
working memory
complex sentences
instructions
carry out specific actions (take medications, turn off stove)
executive functions
difficulty with
reasoning
judgement
decision-making
planning
self-monitoring
sequencing
problem-solving
organization
reading and writing
reading impairments related to visuospatial problems and cognitive linguistic problems
impact language that is used
affect the grapheme to sound relationship
visual-perceptual impairments
agnosia (can’t recognize objects)
prosopagnosia (can’t recognize faces)
difficulty judging spatial relationships
difficulty drawing and copying figures
difficulty distinguishing between important and background components of image
auditory-perceptual impairments
impairment is processing a interpreting tonla and melodic aspects of speech
amusia
auditory agnosia
sound localization deficit
amusia
an impairment of processing, remembering, and recognizing music
auditory agnosia
inability to recognize sounds
theories
theory of mind
the suppression of deficit hypothesis
theory of mind (ToM)
ability to understand that others have thoughts, feelings, ideas and knowledge that differ from one’s own, and that those impact or drive their behaviors
impairments impact intended meaning, efficiency
adults with RHD can have ToM deficits
criticism of ToM
suggest it does not help us to understand the nature of pragmatic problems any more than describing the problems themselves does
suppression deficit hypothesis
people with RHS have difficulty with this suppression process, results in irrelevant information remaining active in their mind interfering with comprehension, memory and discourse processing
normally need to suppress irrelevant info when our brains are activated while reading, listening and thinking
SLP challenges
RHS symptoms are subtle and harder to describe
classifying symptoms are challenging
underdiagnosis attributed to symptoms of RHS less likely to be complained about or noticed
diagnostic process must be multifaceted (standardized and observation)
challenges of people with RHS
specialized interdisciplinary rehab services are lacking
communicative deficits are often invisible
may have additional medical issues
decreased insight into impairments
may have decreased understanding of what intervention may help
what can we do
ensure active interprofessional RHS screening protocols
educate others about RHS and services
raise awareness that com/cog challenges are within SLP scope of practice
provide education and referral materials
left hemisphere imapirments
telegraphic speech
neologisms
paraphasias
agrammatism
right hemisphere impairments
discourse coherence
aprosodia
hypoaffectivity