Key Supreme Court Cases and Their Impacts

studied byStudied by 2 people
0.0(0)
Get a hint
Hint

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

1 / 36

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.

37 Terms

1

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Established judicial review; "midnight judges;" John Marshall; power of the Supreme Court.

New cards
2

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

Established national supremacy; established implied powers; use of elastic clause; state unable to tax fed. Institution; John Marshall; "the power to tax involves the power to destroy."

New cards
3

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

Established separate but equal.

New cards
4

Schenck V. U.S. (1919)

Oliver Wendell Holmes; clear and present danger test; shouting "fire" in a crowded theater; limits on speech, esp. in wartime.

New cards
5

Gitlow v. New York (1925)

Established precedent of federalizing Bill of Rights (applying them to the states); states cannot deny freedom of speech --protected through due process clause of Amendment 14.

New cards
6

Palko v. Connecticut (1937)

Provided test for determining which parts of Bill of Rights should be federalized - those which are implicitly or explicitly necessary for liberty to exist.

New cards
7

Brown v. Board, 1st (1954)

School segregation unconstitutional; segregation psychologically damaging to blacks; overturned separate but equal; use of 14th Amendment; judicial activism of Warren Court; unanimous decision.

New cards
8

Brown v. Board, 2nd (1955)

Ordered schools to desegregate "with all due and deliberate speed."

New cards
9

Mapp v. Ohio (1961)

Established exclusionary rule; illegally obtained evidence cannot be used in court; Warren Court's judicial activism.

New cards
10

Engel v. Vitale (1962)

Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools by virtue of Amendment One's establishment clause and the 14th Amendment's due process clause; Warren Court's judicial activism.

New cards
11

Baker v. Carr (1962)

"One man, one vote." Ordered state legislative districts to be as near equal as possible in population; Warren Court's political judicial activism.

New cards
12

Abbington v. Schempp (1963)

Prohibited devotional Bible reading in public schools by virtue of establishment clause and due process clause. Warren Court's judicial activism.

New cards
13

Gideon v. Wainright (1963)

Ordered states to provide lawyers for those unable to afford them in criminal proceedings. Warren Court's judicial activism in criminal rights.

New cards
14

Wesberry v. Sanders (1963)

Ordered House districts to be as near equal in population as possible.

New cards
15

Griswald v. Connecticut (1965)

Established right of privacy through 4th and 9th Amendments. Set a precedent for Roe v. Wade.

New cards
16

Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

Established Miranda warnings of counsel and silence. Must be given before questioning. Warren Court's judicial activism in criminal rights.

New cards
17

Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)

Allowed states to provide textbooks and busing to students attending private religious schools. Established 3-part test to determine if establishment clause is violated: nonsecular purpose, advances/inhibits religion, excessive entanglement with government.

New cards
18

Roe v. Wade (1973)

Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines: no state interference in 1st, state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd, state may regulate to protect health of unborn child in 3rd. Inferred from right of privacy established in Griswald v. Conn.

New cards
19

U.S. v. Nixon (1974)

Allowed for executive privilege, but not in criminal cases; "Even the President is not above the law;" Watergate.

New cards
20

Buckley v. Valeo (1976)

1st Amendment protects campaign spending; legislatures can limit contributions, but not how much one spends of his own money on campaigns.

New cards
21

U.C. Regents v. Bakke (1978)

Alan Bakke and UC Davis Medical School; strict quotas unconstitutional, but states may allow race to be taken into account as ONE factor in admissions decisions. Bakke admitted.

New cards
22

Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1987)

More leeway for states in regulating abortion, though no overturning of Roe v. Wade.

New cards
23

Texas v. Johnson (1989)

Struck down Texas law that banned flag burning, which is a protected form of symbolic speech.

New cards
24

Employment Division of Oregon v. Smith (1990)

States could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual.

New cards
25

Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)

States can regulate abortion, but not with regulations that impose "undue burden" upon women; did not overturn Roe v. Wade, but gave states more leeway in regulating abortion (e.g., 24-hour waiting period, parental consent for minors).

New cards
26

Shaw v. Reno (1993)

No racial gerrymandering; race cannot be the sole or predominant factor in redrawing legislative boundaries; majority-minority districts.

New cards
27

U.S. v. Lopez (1995)

Gun Free School Zones Act exceeded Congress' authority to regulate interstate commerce.

New cards
28

Clinton v. NY (1998)

Banned presidential use of line item veto.

New cards
29

Bush v. Gore (2000)

Use of 14th Amendment's equal protection clause to stop the Florida recount in the election of 2000.

New cards
30

Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002)

Public money can be used to send disadvantaged children to religious schools in tuition voucher programs.

New cards
31

Ashcroft v. ACLU (2002)

Struck down a federal ban on "virtual" child pornography.

New cards
32

Lawrence v. Texas (2003)

Using right of privacy, struck down Texas law banning sodomy.

New cards
33

Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)

Struck down use of "bonus points" for race in undergrad admissions at University of Michigan.

New cards
34

Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)

Allowed the use of race as a general factor in law school admissions at University of Michigan.

New cards
35

Kelo v. City of New London (2005)

Eminent domain case: Local governments may force the sale of private property and make way for private economic development when officials decide it would benefit the public.

New cards
36

Gonzales v. Carhart (2007)

Upheld Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.

New cards
37

DC v. Heller (2008)

Struck down a Washington DC ordinance that banned handguns.

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 14 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 16 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 30 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 29 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 10 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 44 people
... ago
5.0(3)
note Note
studied byStudied by 7 people
... ago
5.0(1)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard (245)
studied byStudied by 9 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (32)
studied byStudied by 3 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (75)
studied byStudied by 2 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (71)
studied byStudied by 32 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (26)
studied byStudied by 7 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (36)
studied byStudied by 75 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (36)
studied byStudied by 26 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (141)
studied byStudied by 38 people
... ago
5.0(1)
robot