1/14
Learning Objectives - describe various models of clinical decision making - discuss potential benefits of shared decision making - outline a process to follow when incorporating shared decision making into your practice
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What are the different models of decision making in health care?
Paternalistic
clinician’s opinion → patient
maybe most historically used
Informative
clinician provided info → patient
more modern
after considering all information given, patient will make a decision
Shared decision making
clinician ← opinion and information → patient
arrive at a decision together
What are some pros/cons about the paternalistic method?
one direction
doesn’t take into account how the patient feels about it
some people may not want to have to make a decision and think “Dr knows best”
What are some pros/cons for the informative method?
one direction
improvement on paternalistic
letting patient make the decision
patient might want the dr’s opinion
What are the pros/cons of shared decision making?
two directions
takes into account how the patient feels and their values on their condition, prognoses and treatment options
have an ethical obligation to do so !
When are decision aids best to use?
ideal when a condition does not have a clear best option
or
when individual patient preferences or values may lead to divergent treatment choices
What are the benefits of decision aids?
Cochrane review showed that patients given decision aides:
were more knowledgeable
had better perception of risk estimates
had a greater likelihood of receiving care that aligned with their values
were less likely to be passive in the decision-making process
potential cost savings
potential improved adherence/outcomes
potential improved satisfaction
How often is shared decision being used in out-patient clinical encounters?
< 9%
on average, physicians spent ~1 out of 20 minute visit discussing treatment and planning
Steps to shared decision making
understand a patient’s experience
develop a relationship/partnership
provide evidence
including uncertainty
present recommendations
check for understanding and agreement
How to go about understanding the patient’s experience?
take a thorough patient history
helps you frame certain risk/benefits to them specifically
Can ask patient’s directly to get further information
to learn about their goals
to see what they want in the future
to see how they feel about medication use
to see where they stand on risk/benefit
How to develop a relationship/partnership?
be patient focused and not medication focused
ask questions about their background
employment, family, recreational interests
focus on patient’s reason for being there
start with issue/problem/concern instead of their bag of meds
avoid rapid fire, check list-type questions
a patient may feel like you don’t care and aren’t listening
How to properly provide evidence to a patient?
define everything
don’t assume the patient understands terms like “stroke” or “heart attack”
provide baseline risk with no therapy
using validated risk tool
if not, use the event rate in a placebo arm to give rough approx
provide benefits and harms of therapy
provide information in several ways
verbal
pictures/diagrams
written
decision aids
How to discuss if there is any uncertainty?
Indicate when there is any uncertainty in the estimates of benefit and/or harm.
It is unclear, but this is my view of the dilemma…
even though evidence is divided on this issue, i think we can still make a reasonable decision…
How to present your recommendations?
straight forward and include your evidence, and the patients wants.
How to assess for understanding?
ask the patient to repeat the information back to you
give the patient time to reflect and schedule a follow-up
can give supplemental information
especially helpful in terms of preventative medications
Ask:
does that make sense to you?
do you see things differently?
Shared decision making caveats?
always be aware of pre-existing relationships with other health-care providers
could you be damaging their therapeutic relationship with the patient?
recognize when patients prefer a more direct approach