Chapter 20 - Administrative Agencies

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/30

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 7:21 PM on 9/18/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

31 Terms

1
New cards

Enabling Legislation

A law passed by Congress that specifies an administrative agency's name, purposes, functions, and powers.

2
New cards

Limits on federal agency power

Federal agencies may only exercise powers delegated to them by Congress in their enabling legislation.

3
New cards

How state agencies are created

State legislatures create them through similar enabling acts.

4
New cards

Federal Agencies

Handle national issues and enforce federal laws; jurisdiction covers the entire country. Examples: FBI, EPA.

5
New cards

State Agencies

Manage affairs within a state's boundaries, enforce state laws, and run local programs. Examples: California DMV, Texas Dept. of Public Safety.

6
New cards

Municipal Agencies

Operate at the city, town, or county level and manage local public services. Examples: NYPD, local public health departments.

7
New cards

Executive Agencies

Under direct control of the President. Cabinet-level departments of the Executive Branch and their sub-departments (e.g., DOD).

8
New cards

Independent Agencies

Created by Congress with a mandate to resist political pressure. Sit outside major executive departments (e.g., FAA, FCC, SEC).

9
New cards

Delegation Doctrine

Congress cannot give away its core lawmaking powers (Article I of the Constitution) to administrative agencies.

10
New cards

Exhaustion Doctrine

A complaining party normally must exhaust all available administrative remedies before seeking judicial review in court.

11
New cards

Ripeness Doctrine

The party seeking review must show (1) standing to sue and (2) an actual controversy.

12
New cards

Standing to sue

You must be the party actually affected by the agency's decision.

13
New cards

Actual controversy

The issue must be happening now, not merely hypothetical or in the future.

14
New cards

Arbitrary and Capricious Test (5 factors)

An agency decision is arbitrary and capricious if it: 1) gave no rational explanation 2) changed prior policy without justification 3) considered legally inappropriate factors 4) failed to consider a relevant factor 5) reached a decision plainly contrary to the evidence.

15
New cards

FCC v. Fox Television: Facts

Live award show on Fox; a winner said the F-word once during an acceptance speech. FCC's prior policy was a 'safe harbor' for a single fleeting expletive, but the FCC suddenly enforced against Fox as if the safe harbor no longer applied.

16
New cards

FCC v. Fox Television: Issue

Did the FCC follow APA procedures (notice, comment, final rule) before changing its policy?

17
New cards

FCC v. Fox Television: Result

No notice, no comment period, no final rulemaking. Decision was arbitrary and capricious (changed policy without justification, no rational explanation). Fox won.

18
New cards

Hemp Industries v. DEA: Facts

DEA previously allowed hemp products with only trace amounts of THC, then issued a rule making any product with any level of THC a controlled substance.

19
New cards

Hemp Industries v. DEA: Can DEA reclassify?

Yes, agencies can change classifications. But the DEA did not follow the APA (notice, comment, final rule).

20
New cards

Hemp Industries v. DEA: Agency failures

1) No rational explanation for including all hemp products (hemp is used for paper, clothing, oils, furniture) 2) Changed prior policy (trace amounts were fine) without justification 3) Failed to consider relevant factors (hemp's non-drug uses).

21
New cards

Hemp Industries v. DEA: Result

DEA lost; Hemp Industries won.

22
New cards

Notice and Comment Rulemaking (3 steps)

1) Notice: public notice of proposed rule (usually on agency website) 2) Comment Period: interested parties submit input 3) Final Rule: agency must incorporate/address what it heard in comments.

23
New cards

Notice (rulemaking)

Public notice of the proposed rule/change, typically posted on the agency's website.

24
New cards

Comment Period

Interested parties (businesses, the public) may submit input before the rule is finalized.

25
New cards

Final Rule

The agency must incorporate/address what it heard during the comment period.

26
New cards

Agency investigation powers

Conduct investigations; issue subpoenas (compel documents or testimony); conduct site inspections, including warrantless inspections.

27
New cards

Subpoena

Agency order that compels documents or testimony.

28
New cards

Adjudication

Used when a business disputes what an agency is doing. Mechanisms: negotiated settlements, formal complaints, hearing before an ALJ, agency orders.

29
New cards

Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)

An impartial official who presides over hearings and decides disputes between citizens, businesses, and government agencies.

30
New cards

Administrative Hearing

A formal meeting where an agency resolves a specific dispute, e.g., a person/business is accused of breaking an agency rule or was denied something like a permit or benefits.

31
New cards

Agency Order

The final, official decision issued by the agency after the hearing; serves as the final judgment.