Generalisation vs. Discrimination: Stimulus Control and Conditioning - Vocabulary Flashcards

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/40

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering key concepts of stimulus control, generalisation, and discrimination from the lecture notes.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

41 Terms

1
New cards

Conditioned Stimulus (CS)

A neutral stimulus that, after pairing with an unconditioned stimulus (US), comes to elicit a conditioned response (CR).

2
New cards

Unconditioned Stimulus (US)

A stimulus that naturally elicits a reflexive response without prior learning.

3
New cards

Conditioned Response (CR)

The learned response to the conditioned stimulus after conditioning.

4
New cards

Classical Conditioning (CC)

A learning process in which a neutral stimulus becomes associated with an unconditioned stimulus to produce a conditioned response.

5
New cards

Instrumental Conditioning (IC)

Learning where behavior is shaped by consequences, with reinforcement or punishment guiding future responses.

6
New cards

Stimulus Control

The influence of a stimulus on the probability or strength of a particular behavior.

7
New cards

Context as CS

The environment or setting can act as a conditioned stimulus that controls behavior.

8
New cards

Stimulus Discrimination

The ability to respond differently to two or more stimuli based on differences in predictive value.

9
New cards

Stimulus Generalisation

The tendency to respond to stimuli similar to the training stimulus.

10
New cards

Generalisation Gradient

The relationship between stimulus similarity to the CS and the strength of the conditioned response.

11
New cards

Pavlov

Founder of classical conditioning who observed generalisation to stimuli beyond the training stimuli.

12
New cards

Reynolds (1961)

A pigeon study showing how different stimuli can come to control behavior, illustrating individual differences.

13
New cards

Overshadowing

A phenomenon where one stimulus in a compound overshadows the learning about another stimulus.

14
New cards

Stimulus Element

A component of a compound stimulus that can compete with other elements for control.

15
New cards

Elemental Processing

Treating a complex stimulus as separate elements that may independently acquire control.

16
New cards

Configural Processing

Treating a stimulus as a whole configuration; learning depends on the arrangement of elements.

17
New cards

Pearce's Configural Processing Model

A model where learning yields a configured representation of CS and context; responding depends on similarity to this configuration.

18
New cards

Generalisation Decrement

A reduced CR when an element of the training CS is removed.

19
New cards

External Inhibition

A reduced CR when an element is added to the training CS.

20
New cards

Visual Stimuli Control

Visual CS tend to exert stronger control when the CS has appetitive properties.

21
New cards

Auditory Stimuli Control

Auditory CS tend to exert stronger control when the CS has aversive properties.

22
New cards

Garcia’s Bright and Noisy Water

A study showing that some stimuli are more predisposed to acquire control given a US due to evolution.

23
New cards

Konorski Go/No-Go Task

Experiment testing whether responses are guided by spatial location or by sound in go/no-go conditions.

24
New cards

Quality-Location Effect

A finding where control strength depends on whether stimuli are distinguished by location or by quality (sound) of the stimulus.

25
New cards

Stimulus Competition

Elements of a compound compete for mental processing, influencing which aspects gain control.

26
New cards

Stimulus Element Approach

View that a complex stimulus can be parsed into core elements that contribute to learning.

27
New cards

Relative Stimulus Validity Training

Discrimination procedure where A and C are represented with excitatory/inhibitory strengths to elicit correct responding.

28
New cards

A+/B- Training

Discrimination training where A is reinforced (S+) and B is not (S-).

29
New cards

S+ (Excitatory Stimulus)

A cue that signals reinforcement (excites responding).

30
New cards

S- (Inhibitory Stimulus)

A cue that signals the absence of reinforcement (inhibits responding).

31
New cards

Intradimensional Discrimination

Discrimination where S+ and S- differ on a single stimulus feature (e.g., wavelength or pitch).

32
New cards

S+/S- Discrimination in Classical Conditioning

Discrimination training in CC where S+ predicts reinforcement and S- predicts nonreinforcement.

33
New cards

S+/S- Discrimination in Instrumental Conditioning

Discrimination training in operant conditioning where responding in the presence of S+ is reinforced and in the presence of S- is not.

34
New cards

Discrimination Training in Classical Conditioning

Training using CS+ (S+) and CS- (S-) to shape conditioned responses.

35
New cards

Discrimination Training in Instrumental Conditioning

Training using S+ and S- to shape operant responding based on reinforcement contingencies.

36
New cards

Stimulus Similarity and Learning

The similarity between S+ and S- influences discrimination learning and gradient shape (e.g., peak shift when similar).

37
New cards

Simultaneous vs Sequential Presentation

Discrimination is easier when stimuli are shown simultaneously (visual) than when presented sequentially.

38
New cards

Masking

A mask between stimuli reduces attention to elements and makes discrimination harder.

39
New cards

Context Generalisation

Generalising the conditioned response across different contexts.

40
New cards

Prior Learning and Generalisation Gradient

The gradient is largely determined by prior learning experiences rather than the physical properties of stimuli.

41
New cards

Complexity of Stimulus and Control

More complex stimuli (more variables) offer more potential elements to gain stimulus control; perception limits what can become CS.