1/97
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
becker
researched 60 chicago high school students and found that the w/c student is the furthest away from the ideal pupil and therefore will be negatively labelled
Hempel-Jorgensen (2009)
Studied one primarily WC school (Aspen) and one primarily MC school (Rowan). In the WC school, teachers reported discipline as a major problem, and labelled the ideal pupil as quiet, passive, and obedient. In the MC school, where discipline was less of an issue, the ideal pupil was labelled in terms of personality and academic ability, rather than behaviour.
dunne and gazeley
Normalise underachievement of the working-class
Teachers label w/c parents are seen as unsupportive
M/C parents are seen as supportive
This leads to setting extension tasks for m/c but easier homework for w/c (bottom set).
Rist (1970) - Labelling in primary schools.
Observation in a Kindergarten school. Labelling on tables based on ability
The 'Tigers' were the fast learning group- mainly m/c and of clean, neat appearance- seated closest to her and had greatest encouragement.
The 'Cardinals' and 'Clowns'- mainly w/c- were seated further away, given lower level books to read and fewer chances to show their ability.
A03 FSM
-fsm students accounted for 40% of all permanent exclusions
- permanent exclusion rate for pupils eligible for FSM is 0.12 around 4 times higher than for those not eligible which is 0.3
Douglas
IQ tests and the effects of setting and streaming
At age 8 if placed in bottom/low set, at age 11 it would be lower
IQ however drastically increased if placed in a higher set
Gillborn and Youdell
A to C economy- Educational Triage
boderline C/D have the most benefit to schools and so more effort is put into them
especially since schools are judged by progress 8 scores.
Mac An Ghail
The Academic Achievers- Working-class and successful, academic conformists
New Entreprisers- Working-class and successful, academic conformists
Real Englishmen- Middle-class and successful, academic deviants
Macho Lads- Working-class and unsuccessful, academic deviants
The Gays- Anti-school subculture, academic deviant
Evaluation of Mac An Ghail- subcultures
Ball- Mixed-ability classes, labelling still occurred and m/c got positive- labelling is a more important factor than subcultures
Archer- Nike Identities
Boys prioritise their dress instead of educational conformity
Police the behaviour of other w/c boys to ensure that their w/c culture
Archer- Hyper-heterosexual feminine styles
Girls prioritised their sexuality over their educational conformity
Policed the behaviours of other girls and labelled deviants (educational conformists) as tramps
Flaherty
nearly 90% of all failing schools are located in deprived areas and main reason for missing school is money related
Flaherty -stigmatisation of FSM
money problems in the family are a significant factor in younger children's non-attendance at school
w/c children are more likely to have sick days or be excluded
Emily Tanner et al (2003)
Found that the cost of items such as transport, uniforms, books, computers, calculators, sports and music and art equipment places a heavy burden on poor families.
‘Free education is expensive’
Harker (2006)
found that w/c has less space to learn and play and due to less time outdoors, they are more likely to face health hazards and have mental health issues
shelter
1/3 of Pakistanis live in the poorest 10% of neighbourhoods in the UK
mariyn howard 2001
w/c children have lower intake of vitamins minerals and nutrients
Richard Wilkinson (1996)
argues that the lower the social class, the higher the rate of hyperactivity, anxiety and conduct disorders- all have an affect in children's education.
this is due to w/c diet being high in salt and sugar
J.W.B Douglas (1964)
m/c parents are more interested in their child's intellectual development because they spend more time interested in school by visiting the school more often and contact teachers.
m/c more likely to engage with their child during primary socialisation
Bernstein and Young
Middle class mothers are more likely to buy educational toys, books and activities that encourage reasoning skills and stimulate intellectual development.
Bereiter and Engelmann (1966)
Claim that language used in lower class homes is deficient. They describe lower class families as communicating by gestures, single words or disjointed phrases.
Basil Bernstein (1971)
Restricted code belonging to w/c as meaning is implicit and short and elaborate code belonged to m/c as meanings are explicit and clear
Douglas
Working class parents place less value on education, accepted their position fatalistically and therefore, didn’t engage with their child’s schooling
Hyman (1967)
w/c valued their subcultural beliefs more than education and created a 'self imposed barrier'
Feinstein (1998)
found that working class parents' lack of interest in their child's education was main reason for children's underachievement
Sugarman
Working class subculture has four key barriers:
fatalism
collectivism
immediate gratification
present-time orientation
Blackstone and Mortimore (evaluation of parental attitudes)
1. working class parents do not lack interest in child's education but rather does not have time to attend parents evening due to long working hours.
2. working class parents are put off by the middle class atmosphere schools give off.
direct criticism of cultural deprivation
Keddie- Myth of cultural deprivation
victim-blaming
ethnic minority children are culturally diff, not culturally deprived
they underachieve because school are ethnocentric
Bordieu (1984)
argues that cultural and material factors both contribute to educational achievement
the m/c habitus places more value on activities that align with the culture of the schooling system and so m/c kids more likely to be exposed to the habitus of education compared to w/c children
Gerwitz (parental choice)
Privileged, use cultural capital to influence
Semi- WC but want best for kids
Disconnected- unaware of system always WC
Giborn and youdell Racialised expectations
Teachers would give harsher sanctions to black people and would often see black students as having behavioural problems (‘loud and disruptive’) Asian students= a problem that could be ignored
Mac An Ghail
Studied black students in sixth form
Formed anti-school subculture as a barrier to school racism and in fact had a self-negating prophecy
Troyna and Williams (1986)
Ethnocentric curriculum gives priority to white culture and the english language
David
Describes the national curriculm as 'specifically british curriculum' and ignores non European languages
Ball
Little Englandism in the English curriculum
Coard
The low achievement of black children can be explained through their inability to relate positively the curriculum and therefore, have low self-esteem
Mirza (1992)
3 types of teacher racism:
Colour Blind- not racist but didn’t acknowledge or stop racism
Liberal Chauvinists- Not inherently racist but saw EM culture and capital as inferior
Overt Racists- Would openly label and antagonise EM students
Sewell
4 responses form black boys to school:
Rebels- Anti-school, small but influential saw themselves as dominant over white students
Conformists- Largest group. accepted school values pragmatically and friends with other ethnicities
Retreatists- tiny minority, excluded from their ethnic group, anti-school
Innovators- Pro-education but anti-school, didn’t accept school rules or values but had high academic achievement- had respect from the Rebels
McRobbie
Studied women’s magazines
Found that the covers of the magazines changed in line with the rise of feminism and the changing desires of women
AO3 Analysis of EM underachievement
Joseph Roundtree Foundation- EMs are more likely to work lower paying jobs
The Swann Report- Socio-economic factors were a key factor in Afro-Caribbean underachievement
2018 Annual Population Survey:
38% of Pakistanis and Bangladeshis are economically inactive
27% of Black people are economically inactive
Madood
Asian families have cultural capital because:
they place high emphasis on education
They see education as a way to change their social status and gain social mobility
Intergenerational knowledge and values
AO3 Analysis of High achieving Asians
The Migration Observatory- Oxford University:
36% of Pakistani & Other Asian are over qualified for their low-income jobs showing they have higher cultural capital
Basit- ‘Education is seen as capital that would transform the lives of the younger generation’
Chinese percentage getting gcses 5 and above in maths and English: 81.3% boys and 86.2% girls
Driver and Bollard
A 4 yr old that can’t speak English has caught up by age 16
Sewell Family Structures
Generating Genius in response to feeling that boys didn’t have a positive male role model in the home (24.6% of black households are single parent)
Browne- Journey of Female achievement
1980s- Concern over low female achievement
1990s- Girls began consistently outperforming boys
Now: Girls outperform boys in every subject
AO3 analysis: 2019 Attainment 8 score for girls was 49.3 and for boys it was 43.9
Webb et al (2008)
- number of women in employment went up from 47% in 1959 to 70% in 2007
- pay gap between men and women has fallen from 30% to 17% since 1975
- more and more women are breaking through the 'glass ceiling' e.g. Liz Truss, Teresa May, Dianne Abbott
Sharpe
In 70's, girls wanted a husband and a family. In the 90's, girls wanted a career
Fuller
Year 11 girls and their subculture was centred around academic validation being a key part of their identity
Girls believed in meritocracy
A03 for subject choice
In 2000 38% alevel mathematicians were girls, it was 40% in 2010
Diana rey
W/c girls havw limited opportunities for ambittions and job opportunities
Biggart
WC girls are more likely to face precarious position in labour market so see motherhood as only option
AO3 Evaluation of Changing ambitions of girls
Beck and Beck-Gernshiem- Individualisation and female independence is much more valued in contemporary society
French and French (1993)
Internal-Teacher's attention
• Found that boys get more attention overall because of misbehaving and requiring discipline
Myhill
Girls do better from positive reinforcement which created female passivity
Reproduces gender inequality as the higher jobs require assertiveness that girls have lost in favour of academic achievement
Francis
Teachers more likely to sanction boys more harshly than girls leading to boys developing a negative view of education
Spender (1980)
When boys asked questions they were respected, when girls asked questions they were criticised for being unladylike and assertive
Swannn
Boys more likely to dominate class discussions
Girls prefer group work and peer work
Gorard - Linear exams
Girls do better in linear exams as their attention span remains over time.
AO3 Evaluation of Teacher attention affecting female achievement
Elwood- Most subjects have removed coursework and yet girls still outperform boys and even when still present it is a small proportion of their grade
Bleach-
Girls prefer reading long-form prose compared to boys
boys prefer short non fiction books
Manifests itself negatively as Shakespeare= compulsory on national curriculum
Ringrose
There
Mitsos and Browne
Girls more successful in coursework as they are more conscientious and better organised.
Boys have messy and untidy work not done on time
Girls have neat and tidy work which is handed in on time
analysis of examination styles
- exams are linear after coalition govt in 2010 which favours people who are tidy
GIST/WISE
- girls into science and tech
- women into science and engineering
boaler
The impact of equal opportunities are the key reason for the changes in girl’s achievement as barriers have been removed and schools have become more meritocratic for girls
AO3 Analysis- Role Models
ONS 2015- 85% of all primary school teachers are female, 91.5% of teaching assistants are female
DofE (2022)- 75.5% of the teaching force is female
Between 1992-2012- female head teachers rose from 50% to 71%
For secondary school it rose from 22% to 37%
AO3 Negative Analysis of role models
96% of female headteachers are white
97% of male headteachers are white
Coffey and Delamont
higher positions in schools are still male dominated.
schools are competitive, hierarchical and authoritarian which reflects the male attitude in the workplace
Jackson (1998)- consequences of marketisation
Due to marketisation, schools are trying to recruit girls
Slee
Boys are a liability in education
They have behaviour difficulties and distract others
Edwards and David (2000)
- says that parents allow boys to be boisterous and boys have trouble sitting still and concentrating
- argues that primary socialisation of boys have direct impact to male achievement and that boys are more influenced by their peers who have 'macho' values
burns and bracey
- girls have great presentation and care and they are more likely to read and have a higher reading age
AO3 Analysis of impact of Primary socialisation on Boys Achievement
DCSF (2017)- Gap achievement is mainly down to reading
Mothers were more likely to read to their children
Boys view reading as a feminine activity
schemes for boys
- reading champions scheme to encourage boys reading
- dads and sons- gets fathers to read to their sons
- playing for success- used sport to encourage reading and achievement.
Mitsos and Browne, Crisis of masculinity
boys=demotivated and have lack of ambition and low self-esteem
'crisis in masculity' due to the closure of traditional manufacturing factories closed. men do not have traditional masculine jobs to aim for.
AO3 Analysis (negative)- crisis of masculinity in employment
Female employment= 72.2%
Male employment= 78.1%
jackson
- interviews in 8 schools and found that work and trying hard is 'uncool' to boys
Tony Sewell
school has become 'femininised' and don't cater for boys needs
- school discourages male traits such as competition and leadership
AO3 Evaluation: masculine traits such as competition are fostered through league tables
male primary teachers
- only 16% of primary school teachers are male (YouGov 2007)
- Survey of 603 children show how 51% of boys believe that they are better behaved with a male teacher
- 42% of boys say they work harder with a male teacher
AO3 Evaluation of Gender of teacher affecting achievement
Francis- Interviewed 7-8 yr olds
2/3 said the gender of the teacher didn’t affect their behaviour
Read
51 primary school teachers 25 male and 26 female and found two differing types of language teachers used for discipline:
disciplinarian discourse- Explicit and visible, loud and sarcastic, dominant over classroom (masculine response)
liberal discourse- Implicit and invisible, treating children with respect and giving them pseudo-adultification (feminine response)
BOTH male and female teachers adopted disciplinarian discourse thus, gender of teacher has no impact on student reception
epstein
- laddish subcultures
- says there is a culture where 'real boys' dont work and they are more focused on peer groups
- boys who worked hard were called 'swots'
francis subcultures
laddish subcultures are growing and boys afraid of being swots as masculintiy was valued highly
masculinity> educational success
ringrose
The moral panic about male achievement has been sensationalised and exaggerated
Takes time and effort away from other struggling social groups e.g. EM, w/c.
Masks problems girls face in schools e.g. sexism and harassment
lobban
-Gender stereotyping in children's books which has a direct impact of subject choice e.g. The Tiger Who Came to Tea promotes expressive role
norman
Children are dressed differently and given different toys based on gender
Byrne
- boys encouraged to be tough whilst girls taught to be ladylike
oakley
- canalisation results in girls more likely to choose expressive subjects whilst boys pick a more instrumental subject
AO3 analysis of Gender stereotyping
Best Gender stereotyping still exists in books e.g. ‘Dangerous books for Boys’
Gender stereotyping doesn’t exist- ‘Boy in the Dress’
skelton
students would associate a subject with a certain gender
Mitsos
Interviewed 11 pupils in a Coventry Comprehensive schools
Stereotypical male and female behaviour and boys’ differences from girls. Boys had unfavourable responses to English
Kelly
Science was traditionally a male subject as there were many male teachers and boys dominate the practicals.
Male teachers used references that suited male interests
paetcher
Pupils see sport in the male gender domain, so girls who are sporty have to cope with the image that contradicts conventional female stereotype
dewar
Male students call sporty girls 'butch' or 'lesbians'
colley
changing of content in the curriculum can alter its gender and identity- ‘Masculinisation of music’ due to the rise of technology and programming in the subject
Working with a machine is considered masculine- computer science as such is seen as masculine
Arnot et al
girls prefer talk that are open ended- more likely to be English or humanities based
boys like commentary style answers and clear questions- more likely to be mathematic and science based.
browne and ross
Gender domains are shaped at a young age and cause boys and girls to choose different subjects as they perceive subjects as masculine or feminine
murphy
boys and girls approach the same tasks in different way:
girls will look for how things affect people
boys will be more interested on how something works or is made
AO3 Analysis of the effects of school type on subject choice
institute of physics- girls in single sex schools were 2-4 times more likely to pick physics
DFES (2007)- Pupils who attend single-sex schools have less gendered subject images
Leonard- In single-sex schools boys were more likely to pick English and girls were more likely to go on to do physics at university