mock trial study cases

In Miranda v Arizona, the defense argues that Gold felt pressured due to Deputy Kim's actions, making him feel like he was being .

interrogated.

The prosecution argues that since Gold was read their rights, __________ was followed.

Miranda.

According to Arizona v Mauro, just watching a suspect talk to a family member is not considered __________ unless police use tricks.

interrogation.

The defense argues that Deputy Kim created __________ by his actions such as setting up a recorder and putting his hand on his gun.

pressure.

In Rhode Island v Innis, the 'functional equivalent' of interrogation relates to any actions by police likely to get the suspect to say something __________.

incriminating.

The defense can argue that Deputy Kim's comments about Gold's spouse were the __________ of interrogation, as per Innis.

functional equivalent.

Miranda warnings are generally not needed if the suspect does not realize they are talking to __________, as in Illinois v Perkins.

the police.

The prosecution may argue that Perkins does not apply because Deputy Kim didn't ask Gold questions, which makes their argument __________.

weaker.

In the context of these cases, if an officer's actions seem designed to pressure someone to talk, it can undermine __________'s protection.

Miranda.

If Deputy Kim’s behavior made Gold feel __________, the defense argues that statements made should not be used in court.

intimidated.