1/3
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
carol smart
Key thinker in the Personal Life Perspective
Smart criticises traditional views that treat families as simply legal or biological structures.
Argues that people actively construct their family life based on meaningful personal relationships.
She says we should study family from the perspective of the people involved, not through fixed categories like "nuclear" or "extended".
Emotional connections matter more than blood or marriage.
E.g. a friend, carer, or even a pet can be seen as "family" if that’s how someone experiences it.
focuses on how people feel about thier relationships - how dies it feel to be married - focuses on the titeractions , roles and meanings and negotiations.
Stacey
accepting of family diversity - the divorce extended family focuses on the meanings to the individual - “ fictive kin” - refers to them as family but aren’t related to you via blood or marriage
Argues that there is no single dominant family type anymore.
In postmodern society, people create families that suit their own needs and lifestyles.
Especially in the USA, she found diverse family types, such as:
Divorce-extended families (e.g., ex-in-laws still helping raise children).
Single-mother families led by choice, often among working-class women.
She says women are the main agents of change in the family, and many are rejecting traditional roles (e.g., housewife/mother) to shape their own family life.
Nordqvist and Smart-Doner conceived families
They studied families with donor-conceived children, looking at how people define “real” family when there’s no genetic link.
For many parents, what mattered was social relationships and emotional bonds, not biology.
Some struggled with what it means to be a "real" parent if they didn’t share genes with their child.
Donor siblings and anonymous donors also created complex feelings about family identity.
Their research supports the idea that family is what people make it, not just what they’re born into.
Criticism for this view of family
The Personal Life Perspective focuses heavily on individual meanings, which can vary widely.
Critics argue it's too difficult to generalise from personal stories or definitions of family.
This makes it harder to study patterns or trends across society.