1/17
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
3 neoliberalism core ideas
Globalisation
Individualisation
Free market capitalism
3 aspects of globalisation
Promotion of global free trade
Promotion of multinational cooperations
Promotion of international market competition
3 aspects of individualisation
Responsibility on individuals rather than state
Reduction of welfare
Encouragement of self-sufficiency
3 aspects of FMC
Minimal state intervention
Deregulation of markets
Privatisation of public services
Thatcher quote re. society
"There is no such thing as society; there are individual men and women, and there are families."
Thatcher quote re. socialism
“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.”
2 problems with education
Irresponsive
Inefficient
Reasons education has problems
The ‘one size fits all’ approach needs to be disregarded and means local people have no say
Schools waste money and get poor results
This leads to a low standard of achievement → less qualified workforce → less prosperous economy
NR solution to issues with education
Marketise it!
Reasons marketisation improves education
Competition empowers customers → greater diversity and better ability to meet the needs of parents, pupils and employers
Chubb and Moe (1990) - 3 roles of the state in education
Impose framework on schools, within which they have to compete
Ensure schools transmit a shared culture (through a national curriculum, by chance?)
Affirm ✝ national identity
Chubb and Moe (1990) - 3 reasons for failure of state-run education
Hasn’t created equal opportunity
Failed needs of disadvantaged groups
Fails to provide pupils with the skills needed by the economy
Chubb and Moe (1990) - reasons independent schools are better
Answerable to paying customers
Low-income pupils do -% better in independent schools than in state schools
5%
Chubb and Moe (1990) - solution to issues with state-run education
Give each parent a voucher to spend on their child’s education
Vouchers would be the main source of the school’s income, forcing them to be responsive to parental wishes
CRITICISMS of marketisation:
Gerwirtz (1995) and Ball (1994)
Benefits M/C due to economic and cultural capital
2 CRITICISMS
Low standards are due to social inequality and inadequate funding, not state control
The national curriculum and parent choice are contradictory
CRITICISM:
Marxist
Education doesn’t impose a shared national culture, but that of the dominant minority ruling class
Devalues W/C and ethnic minority groups