1/7
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Neoliberalism core ideas (GIF)
Globalisation
Promotion of global free trade, multinational cooperations and international market competition
Individualisation
Responsibility on individuals rather than state
Reduction of welfare
Encouragement of self-sufficiency
Free market capitalism
Minimal state intervention
Deregulation of markets
Privatisation of public services
Thatcher quotes re. society, socialism
"There is no such thing as society; there are individual men and women, and there are families."
“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.”
The NR view of education in a nutshell + solution
State education is irresponsive and inefficient
The ‘one size fits all’ approach causes local needs to be disregarded and means local people have no say
Schools waste money and get poor results
This leads to a low standard of achievement → less qualified workforce → less prosperous economy
Solution:
Marketise education
Competition empowers customers, leading to greater diversity and a better ability to meet the needs of parents, pupils and employers
Chubb and Moe (1990) - consumer choice (the state)
Roles of the state in education
Impose framework on schools, within which they have to compete
Ensure schools transmit a shared culture (through a national curriculum, by chance?)
Affirm the Christian national identity
Reasons for the failure of state-run education
Hasn’t created equal opportunity
Failed needs of disadvantaged groups
Fails to provide pupils with the skills needed by the economy and is therefore inefficient
Chubb and Moe (1990) - consumer choice (independent schools and solutions)
Independent schools are answerable to paying customers and are therefore of a higher standard
Low-income pupils do 5% better in independent schools than in state schools
Solution:
Give each parent a voucher to spend on their child’s education
These vouchers would be the main source of the school’s income, forcing them to be responsive to parental wishes
CRITICISMS of marketisation:
Gerwirtz (1995) and Ball (1994)
Benefits M/C due to economic and cultural capital
CRITICISMS:
Low standards are due to social inequality and inadequate funding, not state control
The national curriculum and parent choice are contradictory
CRITICISM:
Marxist
Education doesn’t impose a shared national culture, but that of the dominant minority ruling class
Devalues W/C and ethnic minority groups