Development of early relationships

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/28

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

29 Terms

1
New cards

Define attachment

  • A long enduring emotionally meaningful tie to a particular individual (Schaffer)

  • Object of child’s attachment usually reciprocates emotions

2
New cards

Characteristics of attachment in infancy

  • Selective, attachment behaviour focusing on specific individuals

  • Proximity seeking, effort to remain close to the object of attachment

  • Comforting, proximity provides comfort and security

  • Separation distress, results when proximity cannot be achieved

3
New cards

Theory of attachment (Bowlby, 1960-1980)

  • An infant is genetically predisposed to develop attachment to their caregiver

  • The mother is genetically predisposed to respond appropriately to the infants attachment behaviour

4
New cards

What 2 levels does theory of attachment function on

  • Biological function, motivation to be near the parent increases the likelihood of receiving care and therefore increases survival

  • Psychological function, provides a feeling of security

5
New cards

What are the 4 stages of attachment

  • Pre attachment, birth to 2 months

  • Attachment in the making, 2-7 months

  • Clear cut attachment, 7-24 months

  • Goal corrected partnership, > 24 months

6
New cards

Features of pre attachment

  • (Birth - 2 months)

  • Predisposed behaviour

  • Grasping, crying, smiling,eye contact

  • Brings adults into contact with the infant and maintains the contact

7
New cards

Features of attachment in the making

  • (2-7 months)

  • Child responds differently to their caregiver vs a stranger

  • Babbles and laughs more readily with their caregiver

  • More easily comforted by their caregiver

  • Can recognise familiar people but accepts care from anyone

8
New cards

Features of clear cut attachment

  • (7-24 months)

  • A major change, proximity seeking, wary of strangers, no longer accept care from unfamiliar people

  • Depends on person permanence

9
New cards

What is person permanence

  • People continue to exist when out of sight therefore recognition of familiar people is not sufficient

  • Requires ability to recall representation of people from memory

10
New cards

Features of goal corrected partnership

  • 24 months onwards

  • Child’s improving representation abilities the understanding of factors to influence temporary absence of a caregiver

  • Negotiation, eg a child asks the parent to play before leaving, this is to cope with the absence better

11
New cards

What is the maternal deprivation hypothesis

  • The infant and young child should experience an intimate relationship with their mother

  • Causes social and cognitive defects

12
New cards

Maternal deprivation hypothesis (Goldfarb, 1947)

  • Compared 30 children separated from mother before 9 months

  • 15 children were fostered early, before 9 months and 15 institutionalised then fostered at 3.5 years

  • Assessed at ages 10-14

  • Institutionalised children were shown to have deficits in intelligence, speech, reading and maths

  • They were also restless, had low concentration, fearful and craved adult attention

13
New cards

Maternal deprivation hypothesis (Harlow, 1958, 1969)

  • Monkeys separated from their mothers

  • Raised in isolation for either 3, 6 or 12 months

  • They were released from isolation and placed with other monkeys

  • All groups showed social maladjustment, aggression and withdrawal

  • Results shown if they were isolation for 3 months or less they can recover

  • But more than 3 months leads to irreversible effects

14
New cards

Criticism of the maternal deprivation hypothesis

  • Confounding factors, MD resulting from institutionalism/ separation in childhood may result as well as hostility in the home

  • Deficits can be reversed, effects of MD are not irreversible

  • Deficits do not always occur, many children are maternally deprived eg death of a parent but do not later exhibit cog deficits or social maladjustment

15
New cards

Bowlby’s monotropism theory?

  • Infants are genetically predisposed to form an attachment to one person

  • Infants are incapable of forming attachment to several people

  • All later attachments are minor compared to the primary one

16
New cards

What was bowlbys theory on the critical period of attachment

  • Proposed that attachment relationships cannot be formed after 2.5 years

  • If attachments are prevented before age 2.5, the child will inevitably develop an “affectionless character”

17
New cards

Is there evidence for a critical period?

  • (Tizard 1977)

  • Studied children adopted after 2.5 years, some as old as 7

  • Children were institutionalised a few weeks after birth

  • Cared for by a large group, this prevented attachment formation

  • The ability to form relationships was assessed at 8 and 16

  • Most relationships were good but a strong emotional bond was developed with foster parents

  • No evidence of the critical period or “affectionless character”

18
New cards

Evaluation of the theory of attachment, Bowlby

  • A comprehensive biologically motivated theory

  • Prompted research into early relationships

  • Improved understanding of children’s emotional needs

  • Led to improvements in institutional care

  • However several components of the theory are not supported by evidence

  • Mistaken beliefs had adverse effects on mothers and caregivers

19
New cards

What can be used to measure attachment

  • Strange situation test, (SST)

  • Developed by Ainsworth et al, 1978

  • Different tests conducted, (a standardised test)

20
New cards

What did studies of SST show? (Strange situation test)

  • Identified 4 major types of attachment behaviour

  • Secure attachment

  • 3 kinds of insecure attachment, avoidant, resistant and disorganised

21
New cards

Secure attachment style (Type B)

  • Actively maintain proximity to mother

  • Distress due to mothers absence (not due to being left alone in general)

  • Secure children are most common and represent healthy psychological development

22
New cards

Insecure avoidant attachment style (Type A)

  • In social settings child may avoid proximity or interaction with mother

  • May ignore mother

  • No distress during separation or due to being left alone

23
New cards

Insecure resistant attachment style (Type C)

  • Clings to mother rather than exploring

  • A lot of distress caused by separation from mother

  • Mix of seeking contact and resistance in social settings

24
New cards

Insecure disorganised attachment style (Type D)

  • Disorientated and disorganised behaviour

  • No clear pattern

  • No coherent system for coping with separation/reunion

  • Parent mental illness, child abuse

25
New cards

Criticisms of SST

  • Artificial situations, unfamiliar surroundings and caregiver is aware of being observed

  • Confounding psychosocial factors, psychological factors other than attachment type, eg susceptibility to stress in general

  • Choice of attachment figure, danger in classifying children based on attachment to the caregiver in the study

  • Is it relevant to all cultures??

26
New cards

Cross cultural criticism in SST

  • (Schaffer 1996)

  • % of attachment type in GB was 75% secure whereas 68% in Japan

  • Similarly, in GB 22% avoidant and 5% in Japan

27
New cards

Attachment beyond infancy/ early childhood

  • Concept of attachment expanded from infancy to lifespan

  • As the child matures, attachment becomes more sophisticated

  • Attachment depends more on abstract concepts eg trust

28
New cards

What is Bowlbys internal working model

  • Suggested individuals form internal working models of attachment relationships

  • Represents memories and feelings about attachment figures

  • Provides expectations about relationships

  • Guides behaviour towards attachment figure

29
New cards

Long term implications of attachment

  • Implications of non secure attachment,

  • Insecurely attached infants at 5 months had poorer social skills and adjustment, hostile and impulsive (Erickson et al, 1985)

  • Whereas securely attached children demonstrated reactions that were less negative to periods of high family stress in middle childhood (Pianta, Egeland and Sroufe, 1990)