1/49
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
ADIME
used as the client care process, or long term process when seeing client
Assess, Diagnose, Intervene, Monitor, and Evaluate
Assess (ADIME)
gather the data (screening, history, tests)
needs analysis
initial meeting
Diagnose (ADIME)
within our scope of practice
name problem you can act on
Intervene (ADIME)
design and deliver the program (FITT-VP)
Monitor (ADIME)
track clients response over time
reassess or adjustments if not working
follow up
Evaluate (ADIME)
judge whether it worked then loop back.
Continue adjust and conclude
SOAP Notes
occurs after every session with client
documentation important for formal record, liability, and professionalism
concise wording but important to provide details
Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan
Assessment Process steps
intro to screen/test
explain the protocol
demonstrate the screen/test
subject demonstrates screen/test to check for understanding
administer screen/test to protocols
explain results
record data
6 components of exercise
frequency (how often)
intensity (how hard)
time (how long per session or sets/reps)
type (which mode of exercise or RT)
volume (total dose = frequency x time x intensity)
progression (how does changes over time)
two clients same goal different starting points- what do we change?
the volume and progression of the exercise
ACSM algorithm: Three questions
current activity level: regular planned PA for at least three months
Known disease: does person have known cardiovascular, metabolic, or renal disease
signs or symptoms: is person currently experience signs or symptoms
Needs Analysis
Individual analysis
movement analysis
Individual analysis (needs analysis)
purpose, concerns, goals
health status
psychological readiness
training status and experience
movement ability
testing
Movement analysis (needs analysis)
biomechanics
physiological focus
injury inherent to desired movement
Purpose, concerns and goals (individual analysis)
details to help you create SMART(EST) goals
explore with the client general ideas
Health status (individual analysis)
may need further details on HSQ information
Psycological readiness (individual analysis)
stage of change, self-efficacy, decisonal balance, outcomes
identify what. supporters and barriers are present
meet client where they are
design personalized program for the client
readiness will help how you introduce the program and pace of it
Supports/barriers (individual analysis)
time, access, other roles
Training status (individual analysis)
important marker for goals, testing and prescription
listen for current activity (FITT and how long its been occurring), Training history (tried, worked and why quit), familiarity with technique (competence)
Experience (individual analysis)
current activity, trining history, techniques, and equipment
screening and testing (individual analysis)
movement screens
exercise tests
Reliability
consistently across repeated administrators
same client, same push up test, two different days
training needed
not enough if test isnt valid
Objectivity
consistency accross different administrators
two lab instructors score same grip strength trial
not enough if test isn’t valid
Validity
does test measure what it claims
established against an already validated standard
how to maximize reliability
client preparation: rested, hydrated, nourish, appropriate clothing
environment: calibrate equipment, Control temp
test administrator: explain procedure, ensure correct form and technique
How to use initial consult and fitness testing results
screen and identify risk
establish baselinen
compare norms or criteria
identify straths and weakness
set SMART goals
perscribe exercise
motivate and educate
monitor progress
Serial test results
repeat measure or self comparison (pre vs post)
ex: day 1 lift 100lbs and on day 60 lift 120 lbs
normative reference (test results)
compare with established % rankings for that test
ex: push up count vs. age/sex categories
criterion reference (test results)
“health” or “fitness” standard
ex: blood pressure being <120/80
ego orientation
“able” only when performing better than others
belief that people achieved based on ability
social status is a primary purpose of sport participation
“I do well when I perform best”
task orientation
“able” when they learn and improve
progress indicates competence that can sustain motivation
belief that hard work can lead to success
ego and task orientation with competence
ego orientation, task orientation with high competence = motivated
task oriented with low competence = motivated
ego oriented with low competence = maladaptive
aim for mastery oriented climate to emphasize serial comparison
how to give feedback on assessment results
accuracy and honesty
plain language
client centered (serial vs norm)
forward looking
scope of practice
movement ability (individual analysis)
neuromotor (functional) fitness
Mobility (neuromotor functional fitness)
ROM, body position specific
flexibility: capacity to move joints freely through normal ROM
symptoms of poor mobility → stiffness or tightness
Stability (neuromotor functional fitness)
posture and control during movement
maintain control through the available range
symptoms of poor stability → poor strength, coordination, or balance
general factors affecting neuromotor fitness
age and sex
activity level and training history
posture
injury
disease (arthritis or osteoporosis)
Factors affecting ROM
joint structure (shape and type)
connective
neuromuscular factors
connective factors affecting ROM
elasticity: return to resting length short term
plasticity: lasting change with training over time
fascia and ligaments or age related fibrosis
neuromuscular factors affeting ROM
proprioceptors
muscle spindles and GTOs regulate how far CNS allows stretch
stretch tolerance: comfort with sensation independent of tissue length
weight training readiness screen
short screen for readiness to begin training
screens for: pain during RT, exercised that are avoided, duration, compensations, and strength changes
a flag is a promo for more information
Weight training readiness form
used after the WTRS or if previous injuries identified
additional data on: location, types of pain, exercise related, duration, treatment, and exercises that worsen
The pathway from paper to movement screen
HSQ → subjective data → WTRS/WTRF → Movement screen
Purpose of movement screen
idenitfy if normal ROM achieved or adequate balance
identify I pain exists
decision pathway from movement screen info
ROM achieved + no pain + adequate balance = aerobic or RT testing
If ROM not achieved + no pain = prescribe ROM
if pain present = refer to health care practitioner
types of mobility screens
Thomas test
ROM with goniometer (knee extension)
Obers test
Piriformis test
Ely’s test
Ankle dorsiflexion
Shoulder Mobility
Active extension
types of stability screen
sahrmann assessment
4 stage balance test
unipedal stance
standing reach
Mobility and ROM screen analysis
no true criterion for optimal range of motion
injury risk for movement screen analysis
inflexibility and hyper mobility
Imbalance movement screen analysis
asymmetry in movement matters as much as total range