Piaget's theory of development

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/27

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

33 - 39

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

28 Terms

1
New cards

What did Piaget believe

  • saw similarities between adaptation and acquisition of knowledge

  • viewed cognitive development as adaptation to the environment

  • gaining knowledge allows more effective interactions with environment

2
New cards

What are the 5 of Piaget’s principles of knowledge acquisition

  • schemas

  • adaptation

  • accommodation

  • equilibration

  • organisation

3
New cards

What are schemas

  • knowledge structure used to interpret the world

  • modified through experience

  • e.g. ‘throw’ schema: some objets bounce, others smash

4
New cards

What is adaptation

  • assimilation: adapt incoming information to fix knowledge

  • e.g. child refers to camel as ‘horse’

5
New cards

What is accommodation

  • adapt knowledge to fit incoming information

  • e.g. child refers to camel as ‘lumpy horse’ - adapts horse schema

6
New cards

What is equilibration

assimilation-accommodation balance

7
New cards

What is organisation

  • process of linking schemas

  • e.g. ‘camel’ and ‘horse’ linked by similarities

  • e.g. ‘grasp’ and ‘suck’ linked to coordinate drinking from a bottle

8
New cards

What are two of Piaget’s methods

  • small-scale experiments

    • presented children with problems to solve

    • young children: inferred cognitive abilities from behaviour (e.g. object permanence)

  • clinical interview

    • with older children

    • conversational style

9
New cards

What are two methodological issues with Piaget’s methods

  • danger of inferring cognitive ability from actions

  • interviews require verbal ability; errors may obscure reasoning ability

10
New cards

What are the 4 stages of Piaget’s stage theory

  1. sensorimotor stage (0-2 years)

  2. pre-operational stage (2-7 years)

  3. concrete operational stage (7-11 years)

  4. formal operational stage (11 years onwards)

11
New cards

What happens in the sensorimotor stage (0-2 years)

  • reflexes: basic building blocks of sensorimotor abilities

  • child learns about the world through reflexes ‘e.g. sucking’

  • gradually gains control of motor system

    • e.g. opens mouth differently when fed with a spoon vs. a bottle

  • repetition of actions that are pleasing

    • habits, e.g. thumb sucking

  • begins to understand cause-effect relationships

  • the major achievement is mental representations

12
New cards

Evaluate the sensorimotor stage

  • Piaget’s findings broadly confirmed

  • but underestimated young children’s cognitive abilities

    • e.g. children attain object permanence earlier than believed

13
New cards

What happens in the pre-operational stage (2-7 years)

  • mental representation improves in pre-operational stage

  • major change in pre-operational stage: symbolic thought

    • language develops, thoughts become detached from actions

14
New cards

What are the three limitations of pre-operational thought

  • egocentrism

  • conversation

  • class inclusion

15
New cards

Explain the limitation of pre-operational thought - egocentrism

  • unaware of other people’s viewpoints

  • Piaget & Inhelder (1956)

    • Three mountains experiment

    • Child and doll sat in different positions

    • Task: choose the picture showing what the doll would see

    • Pre-operational children choose own view

16
New cards

Explain the criticism of Piaget - egocentrism

  • Piaget demonstrated an important cognitive limitation, but Hughes (1978) criticised it.

    • Task not very relevant to child’s experience, child not motivated

    • More relevant task: hide doll so it cannot be seen by police officer

    • 4 year old children, 90% accurate in working out what the policeman can see

17
New cards

Explain the limitation of pre-operational thought - conversation

  • Piaget found pre-operational children have problems conserving:

    • Superficial changes in a quantity do not affect that quantity

18
New cards

Explain the criticism of Piaget - conversation

  • McGarrigle & Donaldson (1974), Criticism of Piaget’s conversation task

    • Children expect that adults carry out actions to change things

    • Children expect there to have been a change

    • The children told the researchers that “naughty teddy” muddled up the objects by accident

    • Children more likely to give correct response than in Piaget’s task

19
New cards

Explain the limitation of pre-operational thought - class inclusion

  • Piaget found pre-operational children have difficulty with hierarchical classification

    • “are there more yellow flowers or more flowers”

    • “more yellow flowers”

20
New cards

Explain the criticism of Piaget - class inclusion

  • McGarrigle (in Donaldson, 1978)

    • Criticism of Piaget’s class inclusion tasks: unusual question

    • Piaget: “are there more black cows or more cows?”

    • Variant: “are there more black cows or more sleeping cows?”

    • 6 year olds: Piaget = 25% correct, Variant = 48% correct

21
New cards

What happens in the concrete operation stage (7-11 years)

  • Child develops new set of strategies called ‘concrete operations’

  • More flexible thought

  • No longer focus on just one aspect of problem

  • Overcome problems of egocentrism, conservation, & class inclusion

  • ‘concrete’ because only applied to immediate situation

22
New cards

Explain the limitations of concrete operational thought

  • lack of abstract reasoning

    • unable to reason beyond the immediate enviornment

    • e.g. “John is taller then Dave. John is shorter than Mary. Who is the tallest?”

    • concrete operational children cannot solve without props, e.g. dolls

23
New cards

Explain the criticism of Piaget - concrete operational thought

  • Piaget was essentially correct, but children can reason abstractly earlier in some circumstances

 

  • Jahoda (1983)

    • Compared British & Zimbabwean 9 year olds

    • Played shopping game with children

    • Zimbabweans understood abstract concepts of profit & loss British did not

    • Zimbabweans had learnt abstract concepts through active participation in family business

24
New cards

What happens in the formal operational stage (11 years onwards)

  • Ability to reason abstractly marks transition to formal op. stage

  • Can think hypothetically

  • No longer depend on concrete existence of objects to reason

  • Have a systematic approach to problems

    • E.g. make all the words from letters A, S, E, T, M

25
New cards

Explain the study by Piaget & Inhaler (1958)

  • 5 chemicals and a test chemical

  • Which chemical or chemicals turn the chemical yellow?

    • Concrete operational: unsystematic approach, often top at first positive result

    • Formal operational: systematically try combinations, note down results

26
New cards

Explain the criticism of Piaget - formal operational stage

  • Abstract reasoning is not an ‘all or none’ achievement

  • Is task dependent

  • Martorano (1977)

    • Tested 12-18 year olds on Piagetian formal operational tasks

    • Only 2 of 20 demonstrated formal operational thinking in all tasks

27
New cards

List Piaget’s contribution

  • First detailed stage theory of child development using scientific techniques (e.g. experiments)

  • Influenced adults (e.g. teachers, etc) to make strong efforts to adapt to the child, as he stressed that children’s thought is qualitatively different to adult’s

  • Highlighted importance of active learning:

    • Influenced child-centred learning methods in nursery and infant schools

28
New cards

What are the overall criticisms of Piaget

  • Are there really stages?

    • Concentrated on universal developmental norms

    • No evidence of a strong link between abilities in each stage

 

  • Underestimated abilities

  • Flawed methods:

    • Clinical interview = misleading questions

    • Inappropriate tasks

 

  • Ignored social factors

    • Viewed children’s learning as solitary