IV, DV, strict controls; controlled environment with no outside factors; NOT realistic to normal, natural circumstances
2
New cards
control conditions
independent variable is absent so that this "neutral" group can be compared to the other groups
3
New cards
experiment
investigation looking for a casual relationship in which the IV is manipulated so we can measure the DV
4
New cards
independent measures design
different group of participants for every variable
5
New cards
demand characteristics
participants may be influenced to think or act a certain way; reduces validity
6
New cards
random allocation
participants placed in random group so they have an equal chance of being in any condition
7
New cards
repeated measures design
every participant performs in every level of IV
8
New cards
participant variable
differences between individual people
9
New cards
order effects
practice and fatigue affect performance
10
New cards
practice effects
participants become familiar with the conditions of the study and improve
11
New cards
fatigue effects
participants become tired and bored of the process as time goes on
12
New cards
counterbalancing
in a repeated-measures experiment, presenting the levels of the independent variable to participants in different sequences to control for order effects
13
New cards
matched pairs design
participants arranged in pairs; each are similar and everyone does their own part of the IV
14
New cards
standardization
making sure the conditions of the experiment are as controlled as possible to account for differences in the subjects
15
New cards
reliability
consistent results
16
New cards
validity
the extent to which a test measures or predicts what it is supposed to (test what you're supposed to be)
17
New cards
field experiment
experiment but in the subjects' natural setting
18
New cards
ecological validitu
applying findings to a more universal topic
19
New cards
ecological validity
quality of studies representative of naturally occurring behavior
20
New cards
natural experiment
experimenter cannot manipulate any variables
21
New cards
uncontrolled variable
can taint results and confuse researcher
22
New cards
informed consent/right to withdrawal
self-explanatory
23
New cards
privacy/confidentiality
all personal information is to be kept within the study and not released
24
New cards
self-report
participants answer questions about themselves
25
New cards
closed questions
quantitative data, no expansion on answers
26
New cards
open questions
qualitative data, expansion allowed
27
New cards
inter-rater reliability
indicates how consistent scores are likely to be if the responses are scored by two or more raters using the same item, scale, or instrument
28
New cards
social desirability bias
trying to make yourself look good by guessing the motive behind test questions
29
New cards
filler questions
try to disguise the true meaning behind the questions and deter subjects from guessing what they are about
30
New cards
structured interview
all subjects asked the exact same questions in the exact same manner to maintain consistency and control; may be scripted; often recorded
31
New cards
unstructured interview
the next question is determined by the participant's response to the previous one; "loosey goosey"
32
New cards
semi-structured interview
mixture of open and closed questions
33
New cards
subjectivity
biased, opinionated, personal to each interviewer
34
New cards
objectivity
free of bias, consistent throughout all researchers or participants
35
New cards
naturalistic observation
observed in a natural environment without any controlled factors
36
New cards
controlled observation
researcher controls the environment
37
New cards
unstructured observation
whole range of behavior is recorded; usually performed at the beginning as a "test run" = "pilot'
38
New cards
behavioral categories
the specific set of observations that are recorded in systematic observational research; pre-chosen behaviors to seek out
39
New cards
structured observation
researchers only look for specific behaviors
40
New cards
inter-observer reliability
consistency between two researchers watching the same event; will they produce the same records?
41
New cards
participant observer
researcher observes from the POV of a participant
42
New cards
non-participant observer
researcher observers by simply watching from afar
43
New cards
overt observer
researcher is obviously a researcher; subjects are able to see and interact with them
44
New cards
covert observer
researcher observes while being disguised or hidden; often used with children to avoid distraction
45
New cards
correlation
looks for a relationship between two variables in which a change in one is related to a change in another
46
New cards
positive correlation
increase in one variable is responsible or accompanied by an increase in the other
47
New cards
negative correlation
increase in one variable is responsible or accompanied by a decrease in the other
48
New cards
experimental condition
situations of the experiment which represent different levels of the IV; compared to each other or the control
49
New cards
hypothesis
testable statement predicting differences between levels of the IV or between variables; testable prediction of the study's outcome
50
New cards
alternative hypothesis
the hypothesis that a proposed result is true a particular investigation
51
New cards
directional hypothesis
one-tailed; hypothesis that states the direction of the difference or relationship (increase or decrease)
52
New cards
nondirectional hypothesis
two-tailed; predicting only that two variables will be related, but we don't know how yet
53
New cards
null hypothesis
any correlations or differences are due to chance
54
New cards
operationalization
defining variables in practical terms
55
New cards
situational variable
confounding variable due to a natural aspect of the environment
56
New cards
control
used to avoid results that are outcomes of multiple variables; raises validity by measuring different outcomes independently
57
New cards
population
total group from which a sample is drawn
58
New cards
sample
group selected from the population to participate in a study
59
New cards
volunteer (self-selectedness)
participants may be invited; they volunteer willingly by replying to an invite
60
New cards
random sample
all population members have the same chance of being chosen
61
New cards
quantitative data
numerical results, quantity, rates and scores
62
New cards
qualitative data
descriptions, quality, open questions, observations
63
New cards
measure of central tendency
mean, median, mode
64
New cards
mode
the most frequent scores in a data set
65
New cards
mean
average score
66
New cards
median
middle score value when all numbers are arranged from smallest to largest
67
New cards
measure of spread
description of statistical variation
68
New cards
range
the difference between the highest and lowest scores in a distribution
69
New cards
standard deviation
average distance of each value from the mean
70
New cards
bar chart
graph used for data in discrete (non-related) categories; gaps in-between each bar to indicate non-correlation
71
New cards
histogram
looks like a bar chart, but does NOT have spaces because all data is related; shows distribution
72
New cards
scatter graph
displays data from a correlational study; dots represent where the IV and DV cross
73
New cards
normal distribution
bell curve; mean, median, and mode are all at the apex; symmetrical
74
New cards
ethical issues
problems and research that raise concerns about the welfare of participants
75
New cards
ethical guidelines
advice and suggests for researchers to use when doing studies
76
New cards
debriefing
giving participants full explanations as to what they will undergo, along with potential consequences
77
New cards
protection of participants
participants should not be exposed to any non-regular dangers; they must leave in at least as good of a condition as when they arrived
78
New cards
deception
deliberate misinformation of participants
79
New cards
generalizability
how widely findings of a study can apply to the world
80
New cards
test-retest
measure a study's consistency by replicating it to compare results