1/40
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Internal validity
determines if changes in the independent variable caused changes in the dependent variable
history
external events influence results; control groups help prevent this
maturation
natural participant changes; use control groups
testing
practice effects from pretests; use alternate forms
instrumentation
tool or rater changes; recalibrate instruments
statistical regression
extreme scores tend toward the mean; avoid selecting extremes
selection bias
groups differ initially; use random assignment
mortality
dropouts bias results; track and analyze attrition
diffusion of treatment
groups share info; separate groups
randomization
equalizes unknown variables
matching
pairs subjects on key characteristics
within-subject design
each person serves as their own control
control of subject effects
deception or blind designs
control of experimenter effects
double-blind methods
demand characteristics
keep hypotheses hidden
double-blind
prevents bias from both sides
external validity
extent results generalize to other settings or populations
tradeoff
higher internal validity can reduce external validity
independent variable
clearly defined and manipulated?
dependent variable
reliable, valid, and objective?
comparison group
control included?
random assignment
properly used?
experimenter/subject bias
controlled (e.g., double-blind)?
sample
representative and sufficient size?
descriptive statistics
summarize and organize the data (mean, median, SD, range)
mean
uses all data, sensitive to outliers
median
not affected by outliers; best for skewed data
mode
simplest; used for nominal data
range
quick estimate; sensitive to extremes
variance
uses all data; less intuitive
standard deviation
common and interpretable
Z-score
shows how far a score is from the mean in SD units
inferential statistics
make population conclusions from samples
we can’t prove hypotheses— only test likelihood(probability)
central limit theorem
sampling distribution approaches normal as sample size increases
mean of sampling distribution = population mean
larger samples reduce sampling error
seven step hypothesis testing procedure
state the research problem
state the null and alternative hypothesis
choose significance level
select the proper test
compute the test statistic
make the decision to fail or reject to fail the hypothesis
interpret in context
decision errors- type 1(false positive), type 2(false negative)
z test
one group; known
t-test
one or two groups; unknown
ANOVA
3+ groups
correlation
relationship between variables
chi-square
frequency counts
writing an journal article summary
citation in APA format
purpose and hypotheses
method: participants, design, and procedure
results: key findings
discussion: interpretation and implications
critique: strength, weaknesses, future research