7. field experiments

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/8

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

9 Terms

1
New cards

what are field experiments

tests economic theories and models in real world setting rather then controlled lab settings by manipulating real world conditions and observing how peoples behaviour changes

2
New cards

why are lab experiments criticised

  • environment

  • context

  • subject pool

  • time

3
New cards

continuum of experiments from controlled to naturally occuring

LAB AFE FFE NFE NE

4
New cards

characteristics of LAB

high control over variables

reproducable

used to validate theoretical models

known subject participants

5
New cards

characteristics of AFE

lab experiment

known public subjects

6
New cards

ffe

field

known public subjects

7
New cards

nfe

unknown public subjects

real world setting and context

8
New cards

ne

no researcher control over assignment

naturally occuring event

9
New cards

deal or no deal blatavaskky and pogenbena 2010

contestants randomly assigned a sealed box with money from £0.01-250000

focuses on exchanges offers in order to test loss aversion

individuals should be exactly indifferent between keeping their box and changing their box

but individuals derive utilty from changes in wealth rather the absolute wealth levels, relative to a reference point

if she keeps her own box she keeps a utility of v(0)=0 as her asset position remains unchanged

contestant derives a strict negative utility from exchanging her box for one of the remianing sealed boxes due to loss aversion so PT predicts her not to exchange her box

eut prediction is to be indifferent between keeping and changing

first offer is a one shot loss aversion

second offer is loss aversion for multiple exchanges

  • first offer results, the contestants are indifferent, in all countries between rejecting and accepting the exchange leading to no loss aversions, perhaps explained by EUT

  • in the second offer, more reject the offer to accept and keep their box

contestants dont appear to be loss averse when dealing with lotteries involving large stakes