1/8
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
what are field experiments
tests economic theories and models in real world setting rather then controlled lab settings by manipulating real world conditions and observing how peoples behaviour changes
why are lab experiments criticised
environment
context
subject pool
time
continuum of experiments from controlled to naturally occuring
LAB AFE FFE NFE NE
characteristics of LAB
high control over variables
reproducable
used to validate theoretical models
known subject participants
characteristics of AFE
lab experiment
known public subjects
ffe
field
known public subjects
nfe
unknown public subjects
real world setting and context
ne
no researcher control over assignment
naturally occuring event
deal or no deal blatavaskky and pogenbena 2010
contestants randomly assigned a sealed box with money from £0.01-250000
focuses on exchanges offers in order to test loss aversion
individuals should be exactly indifferent between keeping their box and changing their box
but individuals derive utilty from changes in wealth rather the absolute wealth levels, relative to a reference point
if she keeps her own box she keeps a utility of v(0)=0 as her asset position remains unchanged
contestant derives a strict negative utility from exchanging her box for one of the remianing sealed boxes due to loss aversion so PT predicts her not to exchange her box
eut prediction is to be indifferent between keeping and changing
first offer is a one shot loss aversion
second offer is loss aversion for multiple exchanges
first offer results, the contestants are indifferent, in all countries between rejecting and accepting the exchange leading to no loss aversions, perhaps explained by EUT
in the second offer, more reject the offer to accept and keep their box
contestants dont appear to be loss averse when dealing with lotteries involving large stakes