1/58
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
The role of laws
What laws DO:
Protect and establish individual rights
Create consequences for violations
Provide peaceful conflict resolution
Why we need them:
Conflicts are inevitable
The role of individuals
Once laws are in place, it is the responsibility of individuals to ensure that we are aware of the laws and abide by them
Will not know all laws but will need to obey all laws
Expected to respect human rights
Negotiation (Alternate Dispute Resolution)
= Opposing parties dealing with each other directly
Simplified process
Minimised cost
Can be through direct meetings or other correspondence
People can have legal rep but it is not required
Most disputes can be resolved this way
Mutually beneficial outcome is sought
Mediation (Alternate Dispute Resolution)
= Dispute resolution that promotes understanding
NOT the same as Conciliation
Focussed on promoting understanding + using creative problem solving to seek an outcome
Mediators don’t have to be an expert in the field (more focussed on communication rather than technical nature)
Dispute may remain unsolved
Conciliation (Alternate Dispute Resolution)
= Involves the use of a third-party (conciliator)
NOT the same as Mediation
Uses a conciliator usually appointed by formal tribunal (sometimes have to be an expert in the area)
Legal rep can be used but not required
Fair & affordable
Opposing parties express their views and discuss perspectives
Mutually beneficial outcome is sought
Arbitration (Alternate Dispute Resolution)
= involves a third party neutral who makes a binding decision.
Used when parties need a resolution that is legally binding
Most intense and expensive method
Independent third-party is used (Arbitrator or panel)
Third-party consider legal implications of opposing arguments
Parties must be willing to accept the outcome
Key ideas of the legal system
Acronym: "MR PEPSA"
Maintaining social cohesion
Resolving disputes
Protecting individual rights
Ensuring fairness and justice
Promoting stability/certainty
Social framework (Making a framework for society)
Accountability (Ensuring accountability)
Fairness (principles of justice)
Impartiality
Proportionality
Due process
Presumption of innocence
Independent & Impartial Judiciary
Independent means separate from the elected parliament and government
Allows courts to maintain the balance of power so parliaments cannot abuse their powers
Judges are free to make decisions without influence from local authorities
All cases are approached equally
Equality (principles of justice)
Equality before the law
Equal opportunity
Non-discrimination
Equality Before The Law
Individuals should not face discrimination
Does not mean that everyone is treated the same
The accused has the right to be treated innocent until proven guilty
Access (principles of justice)
Knowledge of the law
Access to justice
Affordability
The Right To Appeal
Individuals can appeal their case if they are unsatisfied with the outcome
The case is taken to a higher court for review
Only open to people who have either new evidence or can prove that their trial was unfair
Rule of Law
fundamental principle where everyone (including people in power) is subject to and accountable under the law. This ensures fairness & prevents arbitrary actions.
Presumption of Innocence
Everyone the right to be considered innocent until proven guilty in a fair & public trial
Retrospective Laws
Person can only be punished if what they did was illegal at the time of them doing it. Laws can not change what was legal in the past.
Government Challenges
Government can be challenged about its actions through the courts and by the media/citizens
Benefits to the rule of law
Citizens are treated equally and lawfully
Judicial system is independent, impartial, and transparent
Everyone is free from being arrested without a reason, or for breaking an unknown law
Democracy is strengthened because laws are made up by the people
Level of order and predictability in society
Commonwealth
Defence
Communication
Foreign Affairs
Trade
Commerce and Industry
Finance Tax
Conflict (Division of powers)
When there is difference between the laws created by the Commonwealth vs the States, there is an issue
They can be applied slightly differently but there can’t be any conflicting approaches
E.g. ACT & Commonwealth’s law on same-sex marriage
Precedent (common law)
= a decision or legal principle made by a judge
Must be followed by all lower courts within the same court hierarchy where cases are similar (maintains consistency & predictability)
The purpose is that our law develops as a society around it develops
Statutory Interpretation
= A judge resolves a dispute where there is existing legislation but the wording is unclear
It must be interpreted by the judge before it can be properly applied.
Criminal Case
The individual who has allegedly committed the act is taken to court by the state or federal government.
Summary Offence
= minor crimes usually heard in the Magistrates court (e.g. destruction of property, disorderly behaviour, driving offences)
Heard in the lower courts
Usually dealt with through fines rather than imprisonment
Indictable Offence
= Serious crimes requiring a judge and jury (murder, assault, theft, home invasion)
Heard in higher courts like the County court (Victoria), and the supreme court.
Usually result in outcomes such as imprisonment or fines (sometimes both)
Prosecution
The party that institutes criminal proceedings against the accused on behalf of the state/commonwealth
Accused
Person accused of a criminal offence but has not yet been found guilty.
Offender
Person who has been found guilty of a criminal offence by a court
Jury
= Gives the verdict on a legal case
Not always necessary in trials at court
Their main objective is to listen to the facts and base their decision on that
Judge
= Maintains fairness for both parties and decide on the sanction/outcome based on the decisions of the jury
Present in all cases writing the state system
Actus Reus
Action or conduct which is an element of a crime, as opposed to the mental state of the crime
Mens Rea
Intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that is part of a crime (Mental Element)
Doli Incapax
Means ‘incapable of evil’. Legal presumption that children under a certain age are presumed incapable of forming the necessary criminal intent for committing a crime.
Civil Law
= area of law that defines rights and responsibilities of people and groups in society and regulates private disputes.
Involves disputes between individuals over alleged breach of rights
Plaintiff hopes to receive a remedy that will restore their position prior to the wrongdoing
Remedy
Any order made by a court/tribunal to address a civil wrong or breach. May be in the form of damages.
Plaintiff
The party who makes a legal claim against another in court
Defendant
Party that is alleged to have breached a civil law and is being sued by the plaintiff
Tort
‘wrong’. A wrong that has interfered with a person’s legally protected interests
Criminal vs Civil
CRIMINAL | CIVIL | |
PUNISHMENT | Sanction | Remedy |
WHO BRINGS THE CASE TO COURT? | Prosecution | Plaintiff |
WHO IS BEING TAKEN TO COURT? | Accused | Defendant |
STANDARD OF PROOF | Beyond a reasonable doubt | Balance of probabilities |
Tort Law
Negligence = Individual claims they have suffered injury due to another person’s failure in their duty of care
Defamation = A person believes they have suffered harm due to another person’s false public statements
Contract Law
Breach of Contract = One individual believes another has failed to carry out the terms of a legally binding contract
Sanction
= A penalty or coercive measure imposed by a court on a person found guilty of a criminal offence.
Purpose:
Deter future violations
Enforce compliance
Provide consequences for non-compliance
Incentive for obedience
Include imprisonment, Fines, etc.
Remedies
= how a court enforces a right, imposes a penalty, or makes an order to compensate for a wrongful act/breach of contract
Purpose
Address legal wrongdoings
Provide relief to people who have been harmed
Include fines, asset freezes, etc.
Standard of proof
A legal burden of proof that requires the guilt to be proven to a particular extent
Beyond a reasonable doubt (Criminal)
requires the prosecution to prove the accused’s guilt to a point where there is no other logical or reasonable explanation based on the evidence.
Balance of probabilities (civil)
The court must be satisfied that a case is more likely than not to be true based on the evidence provided
Aggravating Factors
= circumstances that increase the seriousness of a crime and can lead to harsher sentences
Examples
Use of weapon
Prior criminal history
Lack of remorse
Victim’s vulnerability
Planning
Substantial harm
Mitigating Factors
= circumstances that can lessen the severity of a crime or punishment
Examples
Remorse/accepting responsibility
Cooperation
Early guilty plea
No criminal history
Significant mental/physical health issues
Youth
Minor role
Jurisdiction
= The extent and official power to make legal decisions and judgements
Different variation on jurisdiction depending of the court
Original Jurisdiction
= A court’s authority to hear a case for the first time
Often establishes the factual and legal bases of the cases
Courts will hear different cases depending of the type of case and severity of the situation
Appellate Jurisdiction
= A court’s authority to review a lower courts’ decision
Allows a higher court to review a decision made by a lower court
Can confirm the initial decision or might overturn/modify the decision
Magistrates Court (Lower Courts)
Victorian lower court
Busiest court in Aus (most legal cases are minor)
NO Appellate Jurisdiction
Hears criminal Summary offences - (decisions are made by a Magistrate)
Hears civil cases worth up to $100,000
Federal Civil Court
Australia’s lower court
Hears matters relating to laws passed by the federal government
County Court (Intermediate courts)
Victorian intermediate court
Hears serious criminal cases , but not murder (heard by judge and jury)
Hears civil cases involving $100k-$300k, and claims of compensation (heard by judge - jury on request)
Is able to hear certain types of appeals from Magistrates’ court
When the accused pleads not guilty, a jury of 12 will determine verdict + judge will determine sanction
Has Appellate jurisdiction (usually in front of 1 judge)
Alternate Courts
Not used as regularly or serve for a more specific purpose
Have different jurisdictions varying on their focus
Koori Court
Division of the Magistrates court for Indigenous Victorians charged with criminal offences
All participants including family members and legal personnel sit at a table and discuss the case
The discussion does not involve legal terminology
Magistrate decides the appropriate outcome
Family Court
The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
Handles various family law matters
Includes divorce, parenting orders, financial settlements, and child support
Mabo 1
May 1982
Eddie Mabo + others began their claim for ownership of their land (Island of Mer)
High court required the Supreme court of QLD to determine the facts
While this happened, the State Parliament passed the Torres Strait Islands Coastal Islands Act
The act was invalid as it conflicted with the Racial Discrimination Act (1975)
Mabo 2
June 1992
6/7 High Court judges agreed that Meruiam people had a claim to traditional ownership of the land
After this, Commonwealth Parliament passed the Native Title Act 1993
This act allows Indigenous people across the country to claim traditional rights to unalienated land
High Court Of Australia
Focuses on interpreting the Constitution, conflicts between states/the commonwealth
Can hear serious federal cases
Cases are heard by 7 justices
Hears cases that are of federal significance or concerning federal laws being broken (Criminal)
Hears cases involving treaties, matters between states (Civil)
Appeals are heard from Supreme Courts across any state. This is the most common case heard.
Supreme Court - Trials Division
Focuses on the most serious crimes
Hears the most serious indictable Offences (Criminal)
Can hear cases worth $300,000 and above (Civil)
Cases tend to be more complex issues
Supreme - Court Of Appeal
Victorian High Court
3 judges usually hear cases here
Hears appeals from the County and Supreme courts
Can hear both Criminal and Civil cases