1/56
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Human populations have not been reproductively isolated long enough to have developed into ‘biological races’
There are no races in the biological sense of distinct divisions in the human species
Classification of humans into races depends solely on the evaluation of phenotype ( observable traits like physical appearance, skin color, eyes and nose shape, hair texture, etc).
And it is arbitrary
Quick and dirty overviews of genetic diversity and natural selection
All living things have a code= DNA which is organized into genes which give instructions to out bodies on how to function (= genotype)
DNA is different between individuals of the same species = genetic diversity
Genetic diversity is what causes differences in the shape of a bird's beaks or human hair color (=phenotype)
Biological variation is present in any given population; variation is the NORM
Genetic diversity and natural selection
Genetic diversity is essential for species survival overtime
Natural selection: Variants best suited/ adapted to the current environment have a greater chance if surviving that other variants
Variants with greater chance of surviving= greater chance of reproducing offspring = passing their genes to subsequent generations
Genetic diversity can be lost when populations gets smaller/ isolated, which decreases a species’ ability to adapt and survive
Natural selection: Mutation creates variation-> Unfavorable mutations selected against-> Reproduction and mutation-> Favorable mutations more likely to survive -> and reproduce
Human genetic variation
Humans around the world share 99.9% of their DNA
Humans also share 98.4 % of our DNA with chimpanzees, 84 percent with dogs, and even ~ 25 percent with a banana
Human genetic variation exists on a continuum rather than in distinct racial categories
This continuum means that there are no “pure: or isolated racial groups from a genetic perspective
Instead, we all share a common ancestry, and genetic diversity is distributed across a spectrum
While there are genetic differences among human populations, the majority of genetic variation is found within populations, not between them (individual variation)
For e.g. Africa has most genetic variation and more genetic diversity between two African people than between two people anywhere else in the world
This means that individuals within the same racial/ ethnic groups can have substantial genetic differences from each other, while individuals from different groups can share genetic similarities
{Physical characteristics such as height, skin color, eye color, and hair type vary widely among individuals, even within the same racial or ethnic group
Only 6% of human genes account for the phenotypic differences seen between “races”
These traits are influenced by a combination of genetic and environmental factors = the phenotypic traits that do exist are largely adaptive in nature
To reiterate: Greater overall variation exists within each “racial” grouping than between them
Skin color is an ancient response to people's geographic environment
Balance between getting enough vitamin D and protecting folate
is a function of melanin production in the dermis layer of the skin
Melanocytes- cells, located in the basal (bottom) layer of the skin, produce melanin, a pigment in the kin, eyes, and hair
Differences in skin color are not due to the number of melanocytes in the skin, but to the melanocytes’ level of activity, i.e., how much melanin they produce
Skin coloring is adaptive
Vitamin D is rare in nature; the human body synthesizes it in the skin with the help of ultraviolet radiation
Vitamin D is necessary for the body to absorb calcium necessary for proper bone growth ‘
Skin pigmentation levels control Vitamin D production
Too much Vitamin D is toxic
Too little will result in rickets- a debilitating bone disease
Northern populations, with little sunlight require minimal pigmentation to produce vitamin D
Tropical populations require darker skin as protection from too much ultraviolet radiation and too much Vitamin D
Dark skinned people are maladapted to northern areas
Lighter skinned people are maladapted to tropical areas (also higher risk of having babies with birth defects, because intense sunlight can destroy folate in the blood)
Two main interrelated reasons
Expansion of colonialism *since the 16th century)- Portuguese, French, Spanish Dutch, Uk
Expansion in africa, asia, and south america
Transatlantic slave trade
Development of scientific Racism (since the 17th century) Positivism, Scientific study of humans and society
= making sense of difference and ‘scientifically’ justifying European racial superiority
Ranking organisms can be traced as far back as aristotle's History of animals (4th c.BCE)
Great chain of being was a framework for interpreting the world
Every organism linked in a continuous single chain; organisms differed from those above and below by least possible difference
In medieval times, the great chain was seen as a God-given and unchangeable ordering (divine ideal = angels outrank humans)
Led to ranking humans Later versions (c. 18th century) = different human ‘varieties’ could not occupy the same developmental level (e.g., sex, ‘race’, etc).
Racism didn't exist until the european expansion and exploration beginning around 1500 (but notions of superiority/ inferiority based on other factors did)
The ancient greeks, for example, saw themselves as first among civilized nations around the mediterranean
But The Greeks did not link physical appearance and cultural attainment
They granted civilized status to the nile valley Nubians who were among the darkest skinned people they knew
They did not grant it to the European barbarians to the north who were lighter skinned
People were divided on the basis of religion, class or language or status not skin color
Before the 1400s slavery was widespread in state societies, and can be traced to dome hunter gatherer pops. Ad first civilizations
Slavery was a universal evil inflicted upon people in almost every culture, region and period of history
But slaves were either recruited internally or from neighboring groups and were largely physically indistinguishable from slave-holders. I.e. slavery not based on race
Slavery was a status anyone could hold
Slave descendants could acculturate into the dominant population and did not become permanently demarcated by race
History of slavery- after 1500
European exploration brought them increasingly into contact with other human societies
Superior military technology meant europeans were significantly more powerful + allies, horses, and disease
As a result, exploration quickly turned to conquest and gave rise to beliefs about european superiority
Portuguese established first- 1526: first ship taking african slaves to Americas; British, dutch, french also became slave traders
Riled of local african elites
Discovery of Americas and establishment of sugarcane plantations = huge demand for slave labor
Part of Triangle trade- Middle passage
Effects on West african societies
Exploiters and colonial slave traders struck by differences in physical appearance particularly skin color
Early distinction emerged between those who ha black skin as opposed to those who had white skin
Black and white were emotionally loaded concepts in European language especially english
White represented good, purity, and virginity
Black symbolized death, evil, and lower worth
African american law professor Kinberly Jade Norwood notes: “slavery was not invented in the New World…” (but) it became so deeply associated with sark skin that “... it was almost impossible to separate the two” (592)
Africans, indigenous Americans and colonized asians were devalued, intermarriage was prohibited
However mixed race children of enslaved women and white slave owners resulted in further colorism as light skinned people were treated marginally better
Example: A slave traders 1859 letter claiming “the girls are brown skin and good house girls” gives an example to how light skin tones were valued
The ‘superiority’ of europeans was thus considered “evident” in all colonial societies by the late 1600s
Led to idea of white supremacy
Rooted in the idea of scientific racism
1500s and 1600s race used interchangeably with type, variety, people, nation, generation and species
By the ;atter half of the 1700s race is strongly equated with “breeding stock”
Farmers and herders understood animal breeds as highly inbred lineages with heritable characteristics
Value judgements were and are critical to choosing the reproducing members of a line of stock, because one breeds for some specific, valued quality
The concept of race emerged in modern form between the end of the 1700s century and the middle of the 1800s
Its emergence in, in part, an aspect of the general growth of scientific inquiry and explanation
In the 1700s, Western science developed, began thinking about and explaining natural and social phenomena and to place the world's peoples into natural schemes
Effort to map and explain a similar order in the natural and social worlds
Reification of race began in 17000s with Linnaeus’ (1735) four races of humans
Blumenbauchs (1795) five races
Early 20th c. three races with further splitting of the European ‘races’
These are arbitrary divisions, based on subjective criteria
Europeans
White, serious, strong. Hair blond, flowing. Eyes blue, Active, very smart, inventive. Covered by tight clothing. Ruled by laws
Americanus
Red, ill tempered, subjugated. Hair black, straight, thick; Nostrils wide; Face harsh; Beard scanty. Obstinate, contented, free. Paints himself with red lines. Ruled by custom.
Asiaticus
Yellow, melancholy, greedy. Hair black. Eyes dark. Sever, haughty, desirous. Covered by loos garments. Ruled by opinion
Africanus
Black, impassive, lazy. Hair kinked, Skin silky. Nose flat. Lips thick… crafty, slow, foolish… Ruled by caprice (whim or impulse)
Culminated in 1795 when Johann Friedrich Blumenbauch first used the word “race” to classify humans into five divisions
Blumenbauch also coined the term “caucasian” because he believed that the Caucasus region of Asia Minor produced “the most beautiful race of men”
Aucasian
Malayan
Ethiopian
American
Mongolian
Anthropologists in the 18th and 19th centuries sought biological basis for race
People continue to think of race as a bio category because the idea has been reified- when an inaccurate concept is so heavily promoted that it seems an unquestioned ‘truth’
Scientific racism: Methods in Anthropology- Typology (of people)
Typology: Involved categorizing and classifying objects, organisms, or people into distinct types based on certain characteristics or traits
Used to categorize and rank different human racial groups, often with the aim of justifying racial hierarchies based solely on traits that are readily observable from a distance such as head shape, skin color, hair form, body build, and stature
Blumenbach actually quite anti racist- had a collection of skulls, his fav. Was caucasian which is why he thought of it as the most beautiful- but he didnt believe in superiority, he believed race was based on geography, but his work was used by others to justify racism
The physical traits chosen to define race are basically arbitrary and oud be things such as hair color, ear, nose or eye shape
Racial categories based on a few traits do not constitute a scientific approach to human bio variability
Religious beliefs greatly influenced by this line of thinking
Monogenism: Single origin for humanity. In 18th c. and earlier- all humans had a single origin from adam and eve
The races are seen as being due to environmentally determined degeneration form europeans- used to justify racist thinking
Polygenism- multiple adams and eves- human races have different origins. In 18th c, and earlier- different races are descendants of diff. Adams separate creations
Scientific racism (19th c.): Louis Agassiz (1807-1873)
Believed science could justify racism and white supremacy (his beliefs)
Used polygenism to argue that black people were part of an inferior race
Also attempted to classify human races like the biological specimens in his museum
He commissioned photographs of enslaved peoples (in the american south and brazil) + people of Africa, indigenous south american, & mixed racial descent (in brazil) as ‘evidence’ of the inferiority of non white [peoples and the dangers of interracial children
Rape of enslaved women sanctioned, resulted in lots of mixed kids. People like this guys didn't like that, thought it would destroy white race
The measurement and analysis of the size and shape of skulls = he cranial capacity (brain size) and cranial features
Claimed that differences in skull measurements could be used to infer intellectual or racial superiority
These measurements have been widely discredited as scientifically flawed and biased
Used craniometry to ‘prove’ white superiority
Doctor and polygenist: set out to province that caucasian people were naturally superior & that brain size was directly related to intelligence
Collected hundred of human skulls & measured them by filling the skulls with lead pellets & then pouring the pellets into a glass measuring cup
His tables assign brain capacity to Europeans (with english highest of all), 2nd to chinese, 3rd to SE asians & polynesians, 4th to native americans, & last to africans and australian aborigines
His work helped establish the ‘scientific’ basis for physical anthropology & racial hierarchies, but also the idea that race is inherently biological
Fixed nature of thighs like head size= fixed racist stuff
In 1977 Stephen Jay Gould (in the mismeasure of Man 1981) reanalyzed morton's data
Discoered that mortons racist bias had prevented identification of fully overlapping measurements among the racial skull samples he used
Gould critique of morton's work was widely accepted in scientific community
Led to a reevaluation of the study of cranial capacity and race. Mortons measurements were found to be inaccurate and influenced by his racial biases
Originated by Franz Gall (1758-1828) & Johann Spurzheim (1766-1832)
Involved examining of bumps and contour of the skull to determine a person's character, intelligence personality traits
Phrenologists claimed that different brain regions controlled specific mental faculties; the size and shape of these regions could be assessed through skull examination
Has been discredited as pseudo science but its use contributed to harmful racial stereotypes
Also known for his writings on kinship, social structures/ society and iroquois society
Theorized that culture evolved in progressive and linear stages, each stage corresponding to certain types of ‘technology”
Stages
-Savagery- fishing, bow and arrow (ex; aboriginals)
Barbarism- pots, domestication of plants/ animals (ex; native americans)
Civilization-writing, phonetic alphabet (ex; greeks)
Prolific and well respected in his time, influenced many others including darwin, marx and engels, and freud
Also Edward Tylor helped do this
Implied racialized worldview: certain races/ cultures will always be more “civilized” (better) than others; placed european society at the time at the highest stage of civilization and considered other cultures as less developed = ethnocentric
Critics argued this oversimplified view of all societies following the same linear path of development does not account for variety and complexity of different societies
Based on limited data from indigenous people of north america (specifically iroquois) = generalizing from a single culture/ small set of cultures = speculative
Downplayed role of cultural diffusion ( the spread of cultural traits from one society to another), in shaping cultural change
“Primitive” contemporary societies have just as much rich history were just as evolved as ‘civilized’ societies
Late 19th c. applied darwin's theory of biological evolution of human societies
“Survival of the fittest” is Herbert Spencer, not darwin.
Claim: like i nature, human societies, the “fittest” or most capable individuals and raced should dominate and prosper
Herbert spencer: British philosopher, coined “survival of the fittest” and popularized idea of applying darwinism to society
William Graham Sumner: american sociologist, advocated for laissez faire capitalism and argued that social inequality was the natural result of competition
Francis Galton: A cousin of Darwin, developed the concept of eugenics, which aimed to improve the human race through selective breeding.
Provided a pseudoscientific justification for existing racist beliefs and racial hierarchy
Contributes to rise of racial segregation, discriminatory immigration policies, and efforts to justify colonization and imperialism based on idea of ‘civilizing’ ess advanced races
Wasn't just about race; social darwinists believed that any attempts to help the poor or less capable slowed social progress
Goal was to reduce government control on wealth and power of elites and limit reforms ike child labor laws and collective bargaining
Unsurprisingly, some of the most well known tycoons of the era- most notably, John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie- were fans of the theory
The scientifically inaccurate theory that humans can be improved (racially + other ways) through selective breeding of populations
Want to perfect human beings and eliminate so called social ills through genetics and heredity
Used methods like involuntary sterilization segregation, and social exclusion
Eugenicist believed in a prejudiced and incorrect understanding of mendelian genetics that claimed abstract human qualities (ex; intelligence and social behaviors) were inherited in a simple fashion
Similarly, they believed complex diseases and disorders were solely the outcome of genetic inheritance
Eugenics is not a fringe movement. Starting in late 1800s, leaders and intellectuals worldwide perpetuated beliefs and policies based on common racist and xenophobic attitudes
Early eugenics movements were always doomed from the start because most of the traits studied by eugenicists hd little genetic basis
However, many of these beliefs and policies still exist, including among those with considerable economic and political power
Promoted ‘aryan race’ by encouraging selective breeding of people considered racially superior
Forcibly sterilizing or exterminating those deemed ‘racially inferior’ including jews and many other targeted groups, like people with disabilities
Extreme eugenics resulted in the holocaust- millions of innocent people systematically murdered as part of the Nazis’ genocidal agenda
Developed a pseudo scientific system of facial measurement that was claimed ti be a way of determining racial descent
Breaking the link between anthropology, biology and race- Biological race: a discredited concept
Boas, Ashley Montagu (1905-1999), Sherwood washburn, wide recognition of mendelian genetics.
More recently:
Shows no proven correlation between and individuals phenotypes and other measures like craniometry with the attitude and dispositions of people.
Variation between populations minimal
Franz Boas (1858-1942) in the 1890s attempted to break the link of anthropology with race by showing that language, race, and culture were separate things and needed to be studied separately
Showed that mappings of northwest coast Native americans biological traits, cultural similarities and linguistic affinities yielded different results
Language can be linked to race- can be diffused across cultures, cultures can influence each other
Franz boas was a major critic of typological racial thinking
Stressed the importance of the environment (esp. Health, diet) on patterns in skeletal form
Found children who were raised in the USA had different cranial measures than their European immigrant parents
Led to a rejection of racial classification
Boas forcefully articulated in his 1911 classic, the mind of primitive man, that race was not a determinant of civilization; rather it was social processed and events/ history
Reconceptualize culture as something that all people had, Not to greater or lesser degrees, but equally
1931- stock market crash and the great depression shifted focus to impact economy and culture on life
WW2- the revelation of the holocaust and the enlistment of science in its perpetuation causes a wave on international revulsion
A number of published critiques of racist science bega to appear in US/ US by anthropologists, scientists, historians, etc.
The result was a gradual disappearance of the concept of race from natural science: in the 1960s anthropology affirmed that biological race does not exist
Required the intermixing of lots of people from different racial categories, especially on the front lines, fighting a common enemy. Black pilots and servicemen in general, racial categories in allied efforts, came together around the same time to help break down the concept of race
Sherwood washburn reformed physical anthropology to focus on adaptation not classification, evolution not typology, real human breeding populations not abstract clustered races, and common themes of ancestry
Post WW1, UN commissioned international panel of scholar to draft a formal statement summarizing facts about the science of race (basically stated that biological race doesn't exist, cultural forces are much more important)
In 1950, anthropologist
Not a fixed concrete, natural attribute
The institutionalization of physical appearance(i.e. The idea is embedded in society)
Socially or culturally and historically constructed
Categories defined and assigned significance by the society
Social meaning which has been legally constructed and shaped by those in power
Racial differences exist and are perpetuated because they have cultural significance
Kenyans running; evolutionary forces, adaptation translates to gold medals
In 20th c. US; laws stated that any person with even one ancestor of black ancestry (“one drop” of :”black blood”) is considered black
Suggests that even a small amount of african ancestry could taint an individuals racial ; created rigid racial hierarchy
Codufiued into law in some states to prevent interracial marriage; racial mixing, reinforce segregation, racial purity (BUT rape of slave was legal and encouraged during slavery to increase slave population, resulting in mixed race children)
People with mixed heritage had to identify as only black (and therefore deemed ‘inferior’) = hypodescent : the automatic assignment of children of a mixed union to the subordinate group
Blood quantum- controversial measurement of the amount of “indian blood’ one has; US federal gov system placed on tribes in an effort to limit their citizenship
Dr. walter plecker was first registrar of virginia's bureau if vital statistics
A staunch eugenicist, he wrote + lobbied for racial Integrity Act of 1924 (one drop rule became law). Virginia’s law was the toughest in the US. These laws inspired Hitekrs Nuremberg laws
Spent his life lobbying against african american , american indians, mixed race people (lobbied to remove “mulatto” to deny mixed race people identity and status); motivated by extreme fear of racial mixing
When under scrutiny: “In reality I have been doing a good deal of bluffing, knowing all the whole that it could never be legally sustained. This is the first time that my hand has been absolutely called.”
Entire life was devoted to ensuring that racial boundaries made clear, to the point where he would write letters to individual families if they were thought to be mixing- ex; wrote to a family who had a daughter rumored to be engaged to a black man. Thought mixed people should be pulled out of white schools, had bodies pulled out of white graveyards.
Categorized american indians as black, wanted to ensure they couldn't get any other status
Jim crow laws- US (1876-1965)
Apartheid- South africa (1948-1990s)
Nuremberg laws- Nazi germany (1935)
Indian residential schools- Canada (late 19th c. to 1990s)
Chinese exclusionary act (united states)
Myanmar's treatment of Rohingya Muslims
Dalits in india
Race is employed in order to classify and systematically exclude members of given groups from full participation in the social system controlled by the dominant group
To deny equality of access to wealth, power and prestige. Deny equality of opportunity
This affects life chances
Local and state laws that legalized the segregation of black and white people in the southern States
Required that all public facilities be racially separate = Public schools, health care, libraries, transportation, neighborhoods, theaters,all had to be separate
Facilities for African Americans usually inferior and underfunded, or non existent
Poor and illiterate people could not vote unless you were white
Segregation was thought to be good for african americans (helps them succeed in their own communities- not the case obviously)
Anti black sentiment was taken for granted
The civil rights act of 1964 did not eliminate requirements that continue to differentially affect people of color
Systemic racism manifests through discriminatory practices within institutions, such as education, healthcare, criminal justice, employment, and housing
These institutions often have policies, procedures and practices that disproportionately disadvantaged racial minority groups
Policies and procedures have basis in history of racism and discrimination
Historical injustices like slavery, colonization, segregation, have created enduring disparities in wealth, education, and access to resources that continue to affect minority communities today
1930s- The home owners loan corporation (HOLC) creates maps redlining communities, meaning they marked racial and ethnic minority neighborhoods in red, labeling them ‘hazardous’ to lenders, greatly contributing to the racial wealth gap we still see today
1948- The supreme court deemed racially restrictive deeds unenforceable
1968- The fair housing act (FHA) was enacted. The act protects people from discrimination when they rent or buy a home, get a mortgage, seek housing assistance, or engage in other housing-related activities
1974- Congress passes the Equal Credit opportunity act (ECOA)
1977- the community reinvestment act (CRA) is enacted to prevent redlining and to encourage banks and associations to help meet the credit needs of all communities
Redlining: boundaries of specific neighborhoods- predominantly Black or immigrant field- that were deemed too risky for financial investment
Some of these laws, policies etc. continue to discriminate today:
Chicago mortgage lenders were 150% more likely to reject Black applicants than similar white applicants. In Waco, Texas, lenders were more than 200% morel likely to reject latino applicants than white applicants
Structural racism and discrimination (including unequal access to healthcare facilities, insurance, and quality healthcare services) negatively affect health
Ex; pregnancy related deaths- higher in native and black women
Health disparities often attributed to race are primarily the result of social and environmental factors
Human genetic diversity is continuous and does not neatly sign with racial categories
Over Reliance on racial short hands in medicine can be harmful
Shift toward more personalized/ precision medicine that considers how health and disease are influenced by individual genetic variation + environmental and lifestyle factors rather than relying on racial, or ethnic labels
-The origins of blackface date back to the minstrel shows of mid 19th c.
- White performers darkened their skin with polish, ut on tattered clothing and exaggerated heir - features to look stereotypically “black”
- The first minstrel shows mimicked enslaved africans on southern plantations, depicting black - people as lazy, ignorant, cowardly, or hypersexual
- This racist history is often swept under the rug or shrouded in claims of ignorance
- Similarly, other cultures caricatures e.g. yellowface, brownface, “noble savage” etc.
- Tokenism
In the media, characters added solely for the sake of making the project seem inclusive. Often, lack dimension and authenticity
Releases creators from the responsibility of conducting proper, extensive research to accurately portray cultures or putting in thought and intention in characterization
In other contexts- gives people/ orgs an easy way out with the premise of superficial diversity
To avoid tokenism is one of the reasons why “equity, diversity and inclusion” policies, training etc. have become more popular (and also elicited backlash)
Exs;
Nadinola skin bleaching cream ad targeted at black women, especially for marriageability
“Fairness creams” are extremely popular in asian countries (ex; ads frm thailand and india)
The brown paper bag test
The brown paper bag test was a form of colourism to discriminate against black americans with darker skin tones
Used by social institutions like black sororities, fraternities, churches, and even social events
Used by members of historically black institutions/ clubs fraternities and sororities to select others who resembles themselves (those reflecting partial european ancestry) and deny access to people who didn't pass
This was due to ideals of beauty, status, and privilege afforded to lighter skinned black people
Ethnicity
A way of classifying people based on common historie, cultural patterns, social ties, language use, and symbolic shared identities (Fuentes 2012)
Created by historical processes, political
Fluid and flexible, utilized to pursue common goals
Not a unit of biology or genetics
It is a cultural classification
Each of us has an ethnicity-0 frequently confused with race
The linguistic and cultural characteristics and heritage a person identifies with
Includes: national origin, language, traditions customs, religious beliefs/ practices, etc. as well as racial category
Nationality: Refers to the legal and political membership in a specific nation-state defined by borders (o.e. Passport, voting, etc.)
Individuals can have mixed racial backgrounds (ex; one white and one black parent) and mixed ethnic backgrounds (a person with Chinese and Indian ancestry). In such cases, individuals may identify with multiple racial and ethnic groups
Ethnicity can sometimes be more fluid than race. For ex. A person of chinese ethnicity who was born and raised in canada may identify as chinese canadian and have a blend of chinese and canadian cultural influences
Ethnicity is about cultural identity and may not always align with nationality (ex; an american citizen of chinese ethnicity)
difference between race and ethnicity
Race
Considered a bio. Classification ( is not actually biological)
Unitary in character (associate with physical characteristics
Shared physical characteristics
Ex; Asian, black, white, indigenous, pacific islander
Ex; an african american person may have dark skin and belong to the racial category black
Cultural identity
Not unitary in character (associated with nationality, religion, language, family traditions and cultural heritage etc.)
Shared cultural values
Ex; asian american, afro-caribbean
A person of mexican ethnicity may have various skin tones but identifies with mexican culture, speaks spanish, and celebrated mexican traditions
More fluid than idea of “race”
First use of “white” as an ethnic label was in 1691 in US, when the virginia colonies mae a law preventing mixed marriages between settlers and people of african descent
Censu labels change over time
Censuses in different countries count people differently
Race/ Ethnicity in the US census
How you define race/ ethnic identity label in the census can have huge impacts for policy
For example, the US census has a seperate ethnicity question and a distinct race question
Everyone is characterized as one of: “hispanic or Latino” and “Not hispanic or Latino” ethnic categories but what race do Hispanic’ latino people choose? Why is this a problem?
Separating “race” and “ethnicity” as different categories has been criticized both by the american anthropological association & U.S commission on Civil rights
Per the US govt on the census FAQ (2023): “The race and ethnicity categories generally reflect social definitions in the U.S. and are not an attempt to define race and ethnicity biologically, anthropologically, or genetically. We recognize that the race and ethnicity categories include racial, ethnic, and national origins and sociocultural groups.”
The American Anthropological Association has recommended that the Census Bureau eliminate the term "race" and replace it with "ethnic origins," noting that many Americans confuse or use race, ethnicity and ancestry interchangeably.
Canadian census uses “ethnic origins”
Canadian? French canadian? Quebecois?
1951- canadian not permitted as a response
1981- Less than 1% report Canadian as an ethnic origin (single or in combination with others) to 4% in 1991 and 57% in 2006
Generational changed (subsequent generations born in canada, for example)
More than 450 ethnic or cultural origins were reported in the 2021 Census