1/6
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Origins of Psychology timeline
17th- 19th century
psychology= branch of philosophy (seen as experimental philosophy
1879
Wilhelm Wundt= opens first experimental psychology lab in Germany + it emerges as its own distinct discipline
start of psychology as its own science
1900s
Sigmund Freud- publishes ‘interpretation of dreams’
psychodynamic approach (not observable= disliked by Watson + Skinner) develops (emphasis on unconscious mind on behaviour + psychoanalysis (physical problems can be explained in terms of conflicts within the mind)
1913
John B. Watson writes ‘psychology as Behaviourist views it’
BF Skinner + Watson establish Behaviourist approach (behaviour is learnt + focus on observable behaviours)
psychodynamic + behaviourist approaches dominate for next 50 yrs
1950s
Carl Rodgers + Abraham Maslow= humanist approach
Rejected behaviourism + psychodynamic + emphasised importance of self determination + free will (by attempting to understand whole person)
1960s
Cognitive revolution started with Digital computers= metaphor for operations of human mind
cognitive approach reintroduces study of mental processes but in a more scientific way (inferences based on lab experiments) than Wundt
1980s onwards
Biological approach= dominate scientific perspective in psychology due to advances in tech (brain scans)
End of 20th century
cognitive neuroscience emerges (bio+ cognitive) + investigates biological structures influence on mental states (fore front of psychology now)
Very early hints at origins of psychology
Rene Descartes- French philosopher- “I think therefore I am”
(like modern day cognitive approach)
Charles Darwin- evolution theory=like biological approach
Wundt
Wundt= first person to call himself a psychologist (first person to decide human behaviour could be studied in controlled, scientific way)
1873= published book- ‘principles of physiological psychology’
1879- first psychology lab- Germany
Introspection summary
introspection= ps reflecting on metal + emotion state e.g. thoughts including sensations, feelings + images (person is gaining knowledge on their own internal thoughts + feelings)
focus was on being objective (wasn’t in the end)
Wundt asked people to focus on everyday object (e.g. metronome) + look inwards, noticing sensations, feelings +images. These objects were carefully controlled stimuli and p was given standardised instructions to ensure replication.
His aim was to break down thoughts on object into separate elements and help him dev systematic reporting on experience of object (structuralism- breaking down thought)
recorded in lab, standardised instructions, controlled stimuli= scientific
it is still used today even thought it isn’t very objective to study mental process
Introspection + evaluation
easy + simple methods and provides direct observations on mental processes (introspection is only method by which a person can be directly aware of his own experiences and try to analyse thoughts)
Using introspection= relatively quick + easy, no lab or specialist equipment so can be used any time or place (just need some level of control)
Introspection - evaluation
ps expected to perform 2 activities simultaneously (experience mental processes + analyse them) they are acting as observed and observer and this can distort their mental experiences. This meant that introspection may not reflect the true nature of mental activities
Method= very subjective + ps report lacks objectivity as it cant be verified by other scientists = hard to draw firm conclusions
Experiences of 1 person can’t be generalised to another = therefore theory about mental processes of everyone can’t be devised as they differ person to person
Lacks empirical evidence(Evidence gained from direct sensory experience) means method lacks scientific validity + credibility when used to construct theories
Many people wouldn’t want private experiences revealed= embarrassment, guilt, shame. The ps may give a more socially desirable biased account= findings lack validity
Further emergence of psychology as a science
Later psychologist rejected introspection as it didn’t provide empirical evidence so wasn’t scientifically robust
Behaviourist approach= argued psychology should be based on observable behaviours which can be quantified only
they used controlled lab experiments e.g. skinner boxes which allowed precise measurement of rats pressing a lever to gain a food pellet reward