Basic Learning Processes Final Exam

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/131

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

132 Terms

1
New cards

negative reinforcement

response leads to the absence of aversive stimulation

2
New cards

avoidance learning

another word for negative reinforcement

3
New cards

negative reinforcement

results in an increase in responding

4
New cards

negative reinforcement

negative contingency

5
New cards

positive punishment

response leads to aversive stimulation

6
New cards

positive punishment

positive contingency

7
New cards

positive punishment

results in a decrease in responding

8
New cards

similarity between NR and PP

subjects are changing how they respond to minimize exposure to the aversive stimulus

9
New cards

Hull, Thorndike, Skinner

behaviorists

10
New cards

two-factor theory

theory stating there are two processes that underlie avoidance learning

11
New cards

classical and operant conditioning

the two processes underlying avoidance learning according to the two factor theory

12
New cards

two-factor theory

theory states subjects don’t make the response to avoid shock, they do it to escape the stimulus that has become associated with the shock

13
New cards

miller and kamin

two people who tested two-factor theory (came up with evidence for and evidence against)

14
New cards

group 1 and 2

Which group groups should have learned to press the lever according to the two-factor theory?

15
New cards

group 1 consistently, groups 2 and 3 sometimes

Which groups actually learned to press the lever?

16
New cards

Kamin

Who’s experiment?

17
New cards

Miller

whose experiment tested if there are two factors, then we should be able to manipulate them independently (two-factor theory)

18
New cards

Miller’s experiment

training: Grp 1: White box = shock; Grp 2: no training

testing: Place each subject in white box (they can turn wheel to escape)

Results: Only Grp 1 learns to turn wheel to escape (only group motivated to escape)

19
New cards

learned helplessness

deleterious consequences of long-term, uncontrollable, aversive events

prior exposure to inescapable aversive events prevents learning about escape when escape is now possible

20
New cards

avoidance

problem with two-factor theory- predicts that fear to the signal would eventually extinguish, but ___ response never extinguishes

21
New cards

conditioned inhibition

new theory to replace two-factor theory

22
New cards

avoidance learning

learned helplessness is a form of what kind of learning

23
New cards

Seligman, Maier, Overmeyer

their experiments tested learned helplessness with a Yoked-Control Paradigm

24
New cards

learned helplessness experiment

Training: escapable shock vs. inescapable shock

Testing: subjects placed in shuttle-box and given access to escape

results: only the escape shock group could escape in the test

25
New cards

inescapable shock

in a yoked-control paradigm for learned helplessness, which group was the yoked group

26
New cards

how to escape

LH subjects can eventually learn to escape shock if they are shown…

27
New cards
28
New cards

associative and motivational

LH results in these deficits

29
New cards

associate deficit

subjects learn behavior and reinforcement are unrelated in one context so they have trouble learning they are related in another context

30
New cards

motivational deficit

subjects have no control over events, so they have little motivation to respond to stimuli

31
New cards

depression, anxiety, illness

LH subjects have higher levels of…

32
New cards

species specific defensive response

SSDR

33
New cards

species-specific defensive reaction theory

Premise x: Aversive stimuli elicit innate, species-specific defensive responses (SSDRs)

Premise y: Which SSDR is elicited depends on the situation and configuration of the environment.

34
New cards

Predatory Imminence Continuum Theory

Premise x: Which SSDR is elicited depends on the level of danger faced by the animal.

Premise y: A signal (CS) associated with an aversive event (US) will elicit an SSDR

35
New cards

closer

according to predatory imminence continuum theory, when the CS and US are presented ___ during training, the SSDR will be more like if there is imminent danger

36
New cards

amygdala

more danger perceived = more activation of this area of the brain

37
New cards

PTSD

parts of the brain that are activated during perceived danger moments are activated when there is no imminent threat in people with this disorder

38
New cards

likelihood of initial behavior, initial severity of punishment, contingency, time between R and P, schedule, reinforcement

factors that affect effectiveness of punishment

39
New cards

likely

  1. punishment works if the behavior is initially ___ to occur

40
New cards

strong

  1. punishment works if the initial punishment is ___

41
New cards

contingent

  1. punishment works if the punishment is ___ on the target response

can only receive aversive stimulus when making the response

42
New cards

short

  1. punishment works if the time between target response and punishment is ___

43
New cards

schedule

  1. punishment works if the timing and frequency of the punishment, or the ___ is correct

44
New cards

reinforced

  1. punishment works if the target behavior is not ___ in other situations

45
New cards

comparative cognition

the study of animal behavior that focuses on the mechanisms by which animals acquire, process, store, and act on information from the environment

46
New cards

general process approach

study learning in animals because of what it tells us about learning in general

47
New cards

comparative cognition

focus on the differences in cognitive mechanisms between humans and animals

48
New cards

differences vs. similarities

comp cognition vs. gen process approach

49
New cards

cognitive ethology

presumption that animals are capable of conscious thought and intentionality

50
New cards

argument from design and not all behavior is intentional

problems with cognitive ethology

51
New cards

anthropomorphism

problem with cognitive ethology which biases research, hampers knowledge, and overemphasizes the human experience

52
New cards

memory

the retention of information or experiences over time

53
New cards

acquisition, retention, retrieval

stages of memory

54
New cards

learning study

type of study that manipulates and then tests the same acquisition conditions

55
New cards

memory study

type of study that does not manipulate the acquisition condition, but manipulates the testing conditions

56
New cards

procedural memory

memory for how to do something

57
New cards

perceptual memory

memory for how things look

58
New cards

episodic memory

form of reference memory, recall episodes and experiences form the past

59
New cards

semantic memory

form of reference memory, recall facts and meanings of words

60
New cards

working memory

short-term memory

61
New cards

working memory

the retention of info just long enough to complete a task

62
New cards

reference memory

stored memory info that can be recalled to help use new info

63
New cards

type of stimulus, duration of exposure, and time between

factors that affect memory in delay-matching-to-sample

64
New cards

better

delayed-matching-to-sample: longer exposure = ___ recall

65
New cards

poorer

delayed-matching-to-sample: longer interval = ___ recall

66
New cards

delayed-matching-to-sample

a memory task in which the animal is first shown a sample stimulus and then, following some delay, is required to select that stimulus out of a group of alternative stimuli

67
New cards

choose same as sample

what is learned in DMTS if there is one rule

68
New cards

if x, choose x, etc.

what is learned in DMTS if there are multiple rules

69
New cards

Premack

used baby chimps to test memory

70
New cards

Premack experiment

Training: delayed-matching-to-sample with set stimuli

Testing: Used new stimuli (chimp had not seen these presented before)

Results: Answered correctly to new stimuli

71
New cards

correctly, incorrectly

Premack’s experiment using baby chimps predicted if they were using “same as rule,” the chimps would answer ___ during testing, but if they were using a specific rule, they would answer ___ during testing

72
New cards

“same as”

Premack’s experiment using baby chimps found the chimps were using this rule

73
New cards

Morris water maze and Radial arm maze

procedures for testing spatial location memory

74
New cards

experiment testing memory for places

training: allow rats to only search 4 arms of 8-arm radial maze

testing: Four-hour delay (rotate maze 90 degrees) – changes spatial location of arms

- allow rat access to all arms

Results: Rats go to the spatial location that they had not yet visited

75
New cards

scent, spatial location cues

predictions for the radial arm maze test- if rat is using ___cues, it will visit arms it actually has not visited; if rat is using ___ cues, it will visit the arms it thinks it has not visited based on cues in the room

76
New cards

spatial location

results from the radial arm experiment show that rats use these kinds of cues to solve the maze

77
New cards

encoding information

the process of taking info in through your senses and translating it into a form that your brain can write down and store for later use

78
New cards

selective attention, levels of processing, elaboration, and mental imagery

factors that influence encoding

79
New cards

selective attention

focusing on a specific aspect of experience while ignoring others

80
New cards

cocktail party effect

phenomenon where items compete for our attention

81
New cards

levels of processing

a continuum of memory processing ranging from shallow to deep, with the deeper processing leading to better memory

82
New cards

shallow

level of processing- physical feature are analyzed

83
New cards

intermediate

level of processing- recognition and labeling

84
New cards

deep

level of processing- meaningful characteristics

85
New cards

elaboration

web of connections, associations, and relevant meanings given to a stimulus

86
New cards

mental imagery

creating a mental story or scene around stimuli that we would like to remember

87
New cards

dual-code hypothesis

theory that states memory is stored in either a verbal code or picture code, which means mental images are remembered better because they contain both picture and verbal codes

88
New cards

imagery in non-human animals

yuck face experiments tested this

89
New cards

Grill

person that tested conditioned taste aversion with rat yuck faces

90
New cards

P. Holland imagery experiment

training: Tone = Flavor 1

              Noise = Flavor 2

Flavor 2 = illness

Test: Reaction to Tone? Reaction to Noise?

results: noise = yuck face

tone = no yuck face

91
New cards

P. Holland Mediated acquisition

training: Tone = Flavor 1

Noise = Flavor 2

Tone = “mental image of flavor 1” = Nothing

Noise = “mental image of flavor 2” = illness

Test: Reaction to F1? Reaction to F2?

Results: Avoid Flavor 2, even though it was never paired directly with illness.

92
New cards

mental time travel

ability to imagine past and future events

93
New cards

retrospective coding

memories for past events

94
New cards

prospective coding

remembering plans for future action

95
New cards

same brain areas

retrospective and prospective coding rely on…

96
New cards

retrospective, prospective

rats use ___coding, then switch to ___ coding while solving the radial arm maze

97
New cards

save room for dessert

what did chickadees learn to do in their mental time travel experiment?

98
New cards

directed forgetting

accuracy of recall can be modified by cues or instructions indicating that something should or should not be remembered

99
New cards

significance of directed forgetting experiment

memory is an active process that can be brought under stimulus contro

100
New cards

Ebbinghaus

who’s associated with the forgetting curve

<p>who’s associated with the forgetting curve</p>