1/9
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Reagan vs Trump (party labels fail)
Reagan gave amnesty, Trump restricted immigration — both were called conservative, so party platforms cannot define ideology.
however party positions fall apart overtime
Conservatism and liberalism are deeper than party platforms. They are psychological, moral, historical, and worldview differences that exist across time.
Conservatism
Society is fragile, tradition holds wisdom, change should be slow, hierarchy is natural, human nature is limited.
Edmund Burke and Michael Oakeshott
Liberalism
Liberalism emphasizes rights, equality, consent, challenging hierarchy, and seeing change as progress.
John Locke and John Stuart Mill
Moral Foundations (Haidt)
Liberals use Care/Fairness
Conservatives use all five foundations (care, fairness, loyalty, authority, purity)
Parties change, but moral instincts don’t.
Helps us understand why political debates feel moral, not merely political
Why each side thinks the other is immoral
Worldview Theory (Hetherington)
Authoritarian worldview values order and strong leaders;
Libertarian Worldview values diversity, and independence
When people feel threatened they become more authoritarian → more conservative
Threat (9/11, recession, demographic change, Covid) increases authoritarianism, which explains both conservative shifts and Trump’s appeal.
Sensitivity to threat
When people are threaten people order stability → conservative
Personality Theory (Openness vs Conscientiousness)
Openness predicts liberalism → curiosity , imagination, acceptance
Conscientiousness predicts conservatism → stability and routine
This explains why ideology is stable over time, it is rooted in traits not just opinions
Similarities and Differences Across Theories
All theories show ideology is deeper than parties and rooted in stable worldviews, but each emphasizes a different mechanism (tradition, morality, threat, personality).
New Deal era (why psychology didn’t matter yet)
In the New Deal era, parties were mixed (conservative Democrats, liberal Republicans) and conflict was economic, not moral or identity-based.
Racial issues, cultural issues, and identity issues were not sorted
so psychological theories did not map onto party labels.
Today’s issues (identity & culture activate psychology)
Today’s issues—immigration, race, gender, national identity—activate threat sensitivity, moral foundations, and worldview differences, making psychology central to politics.
Polarization is deeper, more emotional, and more personal than any time since the New Deal.
Social Identity Theory → Polarization
When party identity becomes a social identity
Parties are sorted along moral foundations (care/fairness vs loyalty/authority/purity)
Issues have shifted from economic → cultural and identity
These trigger moral intuitions, not just policy disagreement
This makes people view the other side as an out-group,
Worldview differences + identity produce deep polarization.