1/8
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
'How far did de-Stalinisation represent a genuine break from the past?'
What are the arguments in this debate?
He only changed aspects of the political system, not the system itself
Given the context, destalinisation can be seen as a success'
Khrushchev DID fundamentally change society through destalinisation
He changed the gov so it was more accountable to him + to the party
Made his contemporaries worried that his changes would lead to even more changes + deconstructing the communist system
Two goals from 1957:
Democratisation - weakening bureaucracy → more responsibility to the people
Decentralisation - more initiatives to the localities
Khrushchev DID/DIDN’T fundamentally change society through destalinisation
What did Khrushchev do to try achieve decentralisation?
Did:
As part of 6th 5 year plan in 1957: 60 Moscow ministries abolished, USSR divided into 105 economic regions, w/ local economic councils (sovnarkhoz)
Hoped to cut unnecessary bureaucracy + get credit for communism/socialism
Didn’t:
BUT ambition > achievement → only added another layer of bureaucracy → system abandoned in 1965 after K losing power
Extended Khrushchev's patronage network in localities
Khrushchev DID/DIDN’T fundamentally change society through destalinisation
What did Khrushchev do to try achieve democratisation?
Did:
Membership increased by 4 mill b/w 1956-64
Role of local soviets increased, comrade courts revived → the people had more control
1957: 105 economic regions
Didn’t:
Extended Khrushchev's patronage network in localities
Khrushchev DID only changed aspects of the political system, not the system itself through destalinisation
Only partially successful in:
Making the Communist Party more accountable to the people
Reforming bureaucracy so it appeared less corrupt + more effective in dealing w/ the wants/needs of the population
BUT these had limited impact on presenting destalinisation to the rest of the world bcs:
Adhering to centralised economic planning
Contradiction b/w economic + political policies
Khrushchev DID only changed aspects of the political system, not the system itself through destalinisation
How did he make the Communist Party more accountable to the people
Secret Speech (1956) - criticised ‘cult of personality’ + said he committed crimes vs the R people + betrayed Leninist principles
Reformed bureaucracy so it appeared less corrupt + more effective in dealing w/ the wants/needs of the population
Khrushchev DID only changed aspects of the political system, not the system itself through destalinisation
How did he reform bureaucracy so it appeared less corrupt + more effective in dealing w/ the wants/needs of the population ?
Did:
Released those accused in the Doctor’s Plot
1956 – reinstated the right to change jobs, allowed annulment of people imprisoned for ‘unauthorised departures’
No. of prisoners decreased from 13 mill → 5 mill
Didn’t:
Centralised economic planning: 1959: state committees + a new Supreme Economic council set up to supervise a new 7 year plan
1957: 105 economic regions → ambition > achievement → only added another layer of bureaucracy → system abandoned in 1965 after K losing power