Markets are imperfect and market participants may be ignorant of facts that significantly affect their welfare
Every land use has the potential to generate externalities that may positively or negatively influence adjacent property values
Real Estate values may be enhanced with good land use planning
More cities are realizing the importance and benefits of mixed use developments
We should expect to see more flexible zoning in the future
A two tiered system is still in place today where property candidates for tax credits must either have:
Been placed in service prior to 1936
Be certified as “historic” through a registration/approval process administered by the Federal government via the Secretary of the Interior
“Highway Beautification Act” under President Johnson
Other design guidelines to limit the colors or control the use of lighting or signage or materials to enhance the uniformity of image
Consistent environmental quality - EQD
ADA requires that facilities that are generally open to the public be accessible to all members of society
Property tax abatement for many years
Land buy downs
Industrial revenue financing
Tax increment financing (TIF)
Infrastructure improvements
Use of abating local and state income taxes on the earnings of a new local employer in order to encourage a location move to an area in a given statement and/or county or city
Competition for large employers has been so strong in some urban areas, especially in areas that border two states, that governments end up in a bidding war of economic incentive packages
At the local level, the investment required to lure a key employer into an area might well be worth the cost
However, at the national level, it is a zero sum game
Developers must have vision and see the opportunities, requires strong analytical and people skills
New concept
Follow the path tested by others
Most opportunity for value and most opportunity for challenges/mistakes
Usually a high use of leverage
Developers
Designers and physical planners
Environmental consultants
Regulators
Neighbors
Competitors
Tenants or buyers
Leasing or sales agents
Property managers or facilities managers
Lenders
Owners/investors
Conceptual stage
Resource assembly and planning
Implementation and contractual period
Absorption and operational period
Harvesting and disposal
Site looking for a use
Use looking for a site
Strategic analysis
Market and competitive analysis
Political and legal analysis
Physical and design analysis
Financial analysis
Project costs
Front door/back door techniques to determine feasibility
Hard costs and soft costs
Absorption costs
Front door = costs to rent
Back door = rent to costs
Parking
Energy supply
Wired or wireless
Percentage mark up over total project costs, i.e. more risk more markup
Return on Costs v. Cap Rate of Return on Value
It assumes total costs do not include developer profit
20% low risk (Build to suit or similar)
35 to 50% higher risk (speculative)
Market
Political
Physical
Financial